Den of Democracy versus  IMPERIAL CROWN SOVERIEGN Agents of influence
  • Welcome to the DEN Contact Us-------PUBLIC INTEREST defense FOR INFRINGMENT OF COPYRIGHT 'ALBERTA & BC ONTARIO SHADOW CIA VK DURHAM CROWN Whale'
  • DEBTORS IN A SECRET FOREIGN PROCEEDING
  • Booming BC natural-gas sector
  • The indictment (1) that the defendants had engaged in a common plan or conspiracy (2) to commit crimes against peace, (3) war crimes, and (4) crimes against humanity. The third count, that of committing war crimes, had ten subdivisions, in the fifth of wh
  • bc rail inquiry=Convertible Gold Debentures
  • s1778 -THE ROOT OF HMS CROWNS PONZIE
    • DEED 189934 in "TRUST (99 YEARS)."
    • SHADOW CIA Maximus- Isreal
    • Crown of England. STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 1997 No. 1778--MAXIMUS GOLD ESTATE CORRUPTIONThis Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America)
    • THE PRESIDENT'S CENTURIONS such as those men President Harry S.
    • 83.27. Punishment for terrorist activity 83.27 (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Act, a person convicted of an indictable offence, other than an offence for which a sentence of imprisonment for life is imposed as a minimum punishment, where the act or
  • The key word is control of the individual.
    • USELESS EATERS are broke and dumbed down -two $120 Billion Dollar“Unauthorized Gold
    • some time in 1987-88.
    • BREAKING OF THE CODE OF SILENCE is an absolute.-PUBLIC SAFETY MINISTER FAILING TO PROTECT CITIZENS ..........PICKTON THESIS ACCORDING TO THE DEADMAN IN JERVIS INLETS JOURNAL
    • U.S.DEBT INSTRUMENTS.... GAIAForgery 1957 PREUVIAN GOLD BOND TIMELINE & CHAIN OF TITLE
    • DEED OF ASSIGNMENT FOR CONSIDERATION EQUITY GOLD COLLATERAL INTEREST SEAL 1 & 2
    • $17 Trillion DOLLARS GOLD
    • U.S.DEBT INSTRUMENTS....Forgery...and "Orders from the TOP:"DO NOT INVESTIGATE."
    • Social Security Purchased by Crown
    • We underwrote another $6.5 Trillion Dollars for the Global Humanitarian
    • 1988 DURHAM TRUST INTERNATIONAL -ASSIGNMENT OF INTEREST
    • 1991 -BRADY BONDS OWED TO DURHAM TRUST INTERNATIONAL
    • 1994-LEO WANTA FORGERY -VK DURHAM AUTHOR US WELFARE QUEEN ---Russell Herman's Boatmens Bank Account.
    • 1994 RICK MARTIN -LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF RUSSELL HERMAN &COSMOS SEAFOOD ENERGY MARKETING
    • 2003 KINGSCROFT INVESTMENT FRAUD -DURHAM TRUST
  • 2011- FBI SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT CRIMINAL CROWN PROSECUTORS FRAUD MILL - PACIFIC WEST COST UNDER ATTACK BY CROWN PIRATES BC marine based WARCRIMES FINANCED A GLOBAL WALL STREET/CROWN/SOVEREIGN DIRECTING MINDS /FREEMASON SOCIETY BY SUSPECTED ILLEGAL C
  • BC FEDERAL WATERS ARE A DANGEROUS PLAYGROUND FOR VICTIMS -IMPERIAL OIL WORLD CORRUPTION -DID CAMPBELL RIVER CITY HALL SELL THE FORGED DEEDS TO WILLY PICTON'S ESTATE
    • MOVED TO WWW.SEALEGACY.COM &WATERWARCRIMES.COM
    • 1979 -CROWN PROSECUTORS MANITOBA PATSY BOB WILSON/ PUBLIC ACCOUNTS FRAUD - took on The Law Society of Manitoba, and got Railroaded by the 'Justice' system! = BOB WILSON WAS RIGHT -SHAME ON THE QUEENS MINISTERS
  • breaking news CR CITY HALL & MAXIMUS US Counterfeiting of US Debt =HEADQUARTERS OF THE NWO- GROUND ZERO 9-11 May 2012
    • HMS PONZIE DAMAGES
    • #29- THE COMPLEX-BONAVENTURE COURT SW CALGARY REAL ESTATE TAX SHELTER INTER-TRANSNATIONAL PONZIE JOYCE KENDAL PONZIE MASTERMIND ONTARIO/BC/ALBERTA
  • AG MINISTRIES------------------ILLEGAL ROYAL QUEEN'S CROWN REVENUE -DISCLAIMER :
  • MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF CANADA NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR CROWN PROSECUTORS IDENITY CREDIT THEFT CRIMES
  • 83.28 (1) Judge Definition of “judge”
  • public safety - LAWYER- FEDERAL MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY IS FAILING CANADIANS AND AMERICANS -FBI WANTED INTERNATIONAL PONZIE PIRATES attack in communities throughout PACFIC WEST COAST
  • 1997-2011 -INDIAN ACT BRITISH TYRANNY - USING ABORIGINAL CULTURE TO LAUNDER ILLEGAL GAINS FOR BRITISH AGENTS -Campbell River Harbours & Homeland DFO security CROWN DEATH POOL INSURANCE INDUSTRY -REGULATORS NEEDED ASAP
  • CRA----------FEDERAL PRIVACY BREACHES -2700 missing CRA FILES
  • CRA ,,,,READ FIRST -COPYCAT PONZIE -everybody got hit. The safety net was ripped out.” FORGER BOB WHITE
  • 2011 PONZIE WARNING - HMS PONZIE IS BACK -IRS/CRA US/CANADA MILITARY MEMBERS Alaska gold fever PONZIE = ROYAL Canadian Mint forges a new path to cash in on gold fever
  • intro -CAPITAL HMS Junk CANADIAN bonds
  • THE QUEENS ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN FRAMED SITTING MLA BOB WILSON
  • THE FRAUD ISSUE: UK CROWN estate freehold property rights
  • 1997-2011 DFO & NORWEGIAN AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY CULTURE OF PONZIE GOLD CORRUPTION sovereign citizens FELLOWSHIP movement may be manipulating US homeland security
  • KENTUCKY ED & WEST MEMPHIS CHIEF BOB ARE LOOKING FOR THE MASTERMINDS
  • corporate fraud NORWAY/CHILE AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY
  • HMS MOTHERLOAD DEED/MORTGAGE FRAUD PONZIE ESTATE ASSESTS AND DEBTS -ISSUE:MIA BC SUPREME COURT FINAL ORDER FOR A 1988 BMO MORTGAGE
  • 1969-2011 CROWN PROSECUTORS PONZIE ROBOSIGNERS LIST - CROWN ESTATE- DFO MARINE - ALBERTA QUEENS BENCH -HMS PONZIE
  • 1974- CROWN MINISTERS FORGED INFEASABLE TITLE /OWNERSHIP THE CROWN PROSECUTORS FORGED ESTATE AND LAND TRANSFER
  • SPIN DOCTORING Is a LETHAL MEDIA DISEASE
  • POWELL RIVER CIBC= WALLS STREET MERS PAPER TERRORISM
  • intro Breaking news--------smoking gun...........July 23 2011
  • #1 UPDATE OCT 2011 -4 MONTHS LATER UPDATE- OCT 2011 WALL STREET UNDER ATTACK
  • #2 EMERGENCY INJUCTIVE ORDER =cease and desist -Life insurance -over insured/SERIOUS PERSONAL SAFETY THREAT -over company insured-2003 TD ILLEGALLY INSURED PENSION BENIFICARY /NO WET INK DOCUMENT
  • #3 intro -ILLEGAL CROWN ASSIGNMENT- ILLEGAL CREDITORS AND FORGE GOVERMENT LEINS.-BC HOME AQUISTION ACT FALSE CHARGE ON CLEAR TITLE
  • #4 11MAY11-affadavit of PONZIE -JOYCE KENDALL LOST RECORDS -MARY WILLIAMS/JOYCE KENDAL FORGED AUTHORSHIP
  • #5- IN THE LINE OF PUBLIC FAMILY SAFETY DUTY
  • #6- 1973- BC DOUBLE DEED FRAUD CANADA TRUST/TD MORTGAGE FRAUD BIRTH OF ASCALADE INC.. & CROWN PONZIE
  • #7 2011 MAY -SOVEREIGN BSIG AGENT -TREVOR JOYAL - NORTH ISLAND HMS PONZIE INVESTORS GROUP
  • #8 -COURT AUTHORSHIP-WITNESSES ACCUSED-HANDWRITING FINGERPRINTS FROM PERU LED TO CAMPBELL RIVER ,CALGARY,FLORIDA ,CALIF CRIMINALS EGO LED TO SLOPPY FORGING
  • #9 -intro -PROF COX FROM DUKES UNVERSITY EXPLAINS OUR FORGED imperial QUEEN ESTATES NIGHTMARE
  • Innovative Aquaculture MARINE/FEDERAL WATER BASED Projects SOVEREIGN /CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP /PONZIE clean up fund
  • ISSUE :SOVEREIGN INVESTORS FORGED ESTATE TAKEOVERS /FELLOWSHIP FRAUD
  • FACEBOOK UNIVERSITY/JUDCIAL ETHICS COURT
  • #10- LEHMAN BROTHERS -THE REAL FLORIDA- MR BRUCE GRANT BONAVENTURE/
  • #11 - IDENTITY THEFT DUE TO FORGED BC MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE CREATING 2 FORGED JOINT MATRIMONIAL LIFE STATES -ALBERTA WILEYS
  • #13-- INTERNATIONAL MERS SOVEREIGN SOVEREIGN PONZIE BRANCH SHUT DOWN /RESTORE COURT RECORD /LEGAL LAND TITLES AND DEBT OWNERSHIP.......1QT-NOT WELCOME IN NASHVILLE....TRIBUTE TO BRANDON & BILL AND THE CHEIF & 60 MINUTES
  • #14- INTRO & ISSUES -- BACKGROUND OF THE INVESTMENT/TAX SHELTER /FLORIDA ESTATE FRAUD PENSION PONZIE SCHEME Parliament needs to act to close the loophole that allowed the situation to occur FORGED INCORPORATED OFFSHORE ,US, BC ALBERTA ONTARIO,LTD companie
  • #15-PONZIE CRIME IN PROGRESS -INTERNATIONAL CROWN PONZIE INCORPORATED TRAIL /DIRTY DEEDS OF TRUST DONE DIRT CHEAP/ /NEW HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE ON OR OFF THE JOB -BC WEST COAST SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT DESTROYING COASTAL COMMUNITIES AND INDUSTRY-TARGETE
  • #16- CALGARY -ALGER TRUSTEE BANKRUPTCY FRAUD -SOVEREIGN EX SIGNS AS JUDGE HORNER
  • #17- -SERIOUS THREAT TO LIFE/TARGETED VICTIM 0F MASSIVE LEVELS OF IDENTITY THEFT ALBERTA -SELLER OF AN RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX FOR $600,000
  • #18- -2011- LIFE INSURANCE FRAUD OVER INSURED COMPANY INTEREST - ALBERTA PERSONAL PROPERTY REGISTRY CORRUPTION- REMOVE FRAUD FROM ALBERTA P
  • #20- BC MINISTRY OF SOCIAL SERVICES DROPPED THE BALL -public safety =JERVIS DEADMANS CONNECTION TO DAVIS /LAWYER/ CHILDREN VICTIMS - LETHAL SPIN OFF EFFECTS OF A SOVEREIGN RUN PONZIE
  • #21- public safety =CRA / MAXIMUS WELFARE sovereign QUEENS PAPER WRIT PONZIE TERRORISM US MAXIMUS ponzie -across state linesCANADIAN FEDS/US
  • #22- PLAINTIFFS -GLENMOUNT
  • #23- KINGSCROFT UNIT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
  • #24- 1999 ONTARIO LTD 658051
  • #25- -JOYCE KENDAL AFFADAVIT -KENDAX
  • #40- 17-JUN02- PRINCIPLE TERRY L. DODWELL SENTENCED FOR 15 YEARS The Vavasseur programme was operated and controlled by an American citizen named Terry Dowdell who purported to be able to generate substantial profits by trading in bonds.
  • #26- GRANTEE.........1998 (“Vavasseur”), a Bahamian corporation owned beginning in April 1998 and continuing through 2001,
  • #27- GRANTEE...........ATCO DEED KATHLEEN MARIE ALVES
  • #27b- =cease and desist - CROWN ATTORNEY GENERALS MINISTRY//US MAXIMUS/CRA -NAME GAME/ESTATE FRAUD/COLD CALCULATED ACCOUNTING FRAUD
  • #28- -cease and desist -1969 -2011 PONZIE WAR - FORGED & VIOLATED CONSENT BC ESTATE DEED OF TRUST -- CIBC /DAVIS CONNECTION TO BC SUPREME COURT-DIVORCE /FORECLOSURE LIFE BENCHER BC SUPREME COURT JUSTICE GRANT BURNYEAT
  • #30- =cease and desist -BISG sovereign investors payout on insurance fraud
  • #31- cease and desist -2009-ATB FINANCIAL-CROWN SECURITIES FRAUD/IDENTITY CREDIT THEFT ,ESTATE FRAUD
  • #32- A ISSUE OUTSOURCING GOVERMENT CONTRACTS - US MAXIMUS INC IN HOUSE SOVERIGN CROWN FORGED CONTRACT Structurists-BC ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE BRENT HIRD/SUSAN CARR AGENT FOR THEMIS /MAXIMUS/FMEP
  • #33- MERS ASSIGNED/FORGED 1988 BMO -1ST MORTGAGE/DEED OF TRUST - APPENDIX #A WAS ADDED SEP23 1993
  • #34-----EVIDENCE-1995 BC SUPREME STATEMENT OF CLAIM FOR FINAL ORDER
  • #35- FLORIDA TRUST BOND BRANCHES- Who bought bonds issued by different trusts that were set up by a particular bank or mortgage company, ?
  • #36- -SMOKING GUN........ 1989 INDUSTRY CANADA FRAUD
  • #37- -SOVEREIGN INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY APPEAL COURT --------- RE :BC DIVORCE FRAUD BC SUPREME COURT FINAL ORDER
  • #38- -1969-2011 IN THE PATH OF A HMS BRIXON GROUP BC WESTCOAT/ALBERTA PONZIE with business advantages/perks and lifestyle appeal.[4]
  • #39- -KINGSCROFT BONAVENTURE ILLEGAL FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY
  • #40 -Maximus /BC HEALTH CORRUPTION/IDENITY THEFT FRAUD RING/ SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT ACCOUNTING
  • #41- -LEGAL OATHBREAKERS IN COLLUSION W/INDUSTRY CANADA/ PERJURY INFESTATION AND - SOVERIEGN WALL STREET CONTRACT STRUCTULISTS TAKE OVER-
  • #42 -1997- THE IMPERIAL SOVEREIGNS QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA-ILLEGAL ATTACHMENT
  • #43- -CEASE AND DESIST SOVERIEGN BSIG INVESTOR POOL AGENT PERU LINDA DIXON
  • #44- -2011- CIBC CEASE AND DESIST BONAVENTURE COURT CROWN- /WALL STREET SOVERIEGN CREDITORS INTENDED TO DEFRAUD DEBTOR
  • #45-MCKEE BC FIRST NATIONS insurance MASTERMINDS CROWN CIBC/ATB FINANCIAL ALBERTA CROWN BANKinvestigation-
  • #46 --public safety/FEDERAL WATERS/HARBOUR BASED -illegal MONEY MOVERS /estates via forged federal liens/attachments FINANCING OFFSHORE VENTURE CAPITAL/PRIVATE WEALTH/INDUSTRY INVESTORS IE:GOLD IN PERU
  • #47- -SW CALGARY LEGAL SOVEREIGN CITIZEN AID HIGH INTEREST RETURN PONZIE HOUSE- BONAVENTURE COURT FINANCED BY FRAUD
  • #48- -INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS NEEDED TO STOP MERS COMMON LAW COURT CLEAN UP ASAP----- COMMON LAW INTERNATIONAL SOVEREIGN LEGISLATION/ SLAYER LAWS
  • #49- US NATIVE SOVEREIGN MASTERMIND IN JAIL IN CALIFORNIA -JANICE WEEKS KATONA SEEKING TO REOPEN A 1992 CHAPTER 11 FLORIDA BANKRUPTCY CASE-TO ALLOW TRUSTEE/ADMINISTER TO RELEASE TRUST ASSETS-NO GO SHOT DOWN BY FLORIDA ORLANDO BANKRUPTCY COURT- JUDGE K
  • #50- -SOVEREIGN BC QUEEN/PENSION MINISTRY OF SOCIAL SERVICES /FMP FRAUD GRAB
  • #51- -CANADIAN LEGAL AID IMPERIAL CROWN MASTERMINDS OF US/CANADA SOVERIEGN STRUCTULISTS MASTERMINDS ENGINEERED CONTRACTS ARE KILLING WEST MEMPHIS POLICE AND POLITCALLY TARGETED WHISTLEBLOWER EASY TARGETS
  • #52- -1995- PERJURING PLAINTIFF BC SUPREME/FAMILY COURT - PONZIE/PERJURY /BONAVENTURE SECRET SOVERIEGN COURT/TRANSFER OF A FORGED ESTATE 1993
  • #53- -PERJURY FINANCED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY = SOVEREIGN WRONGDOERS FAILED TO INFORM JUSTICE MEIKLEM OF THE BC SUPREME COURT ON JUNE 19 1995 -THAT THE BMO 1ST MATRIMONIAL MORTGAGE IN QUESTION HAD ACTUALLY BEEN FORECLOSED - EXPLAINS MIA/ BMO 1ST MATR
  • #54- -PUBLIC SAFETY - CRA/MAXIMUS CROWN /CITIZEN SOVERIEGNS PENSION PONZIE/
  • #55- --MONEY MOVER HIJACKED STEELWORKERS PENSION ACCOUNT TAKEOVER/SEIZED BY ILLEGAL ATTACHMENTS
  • #56- -CONTEMPT/TREASON SERVICE ALBERTA CROWN DEBT COLLECTIONS
  • #57- -QUEENS BENCH AUTHOR NOT IS NOT A JUDGE BUT SOVEREIGN EX WIFE OR EX GITLFRIEN-AKA FLORIDAS LINDA GREENS
  • #58- -BROKEN COURT RECORD -1995 LORDSHIP ISSUE IGNORED BY BIG CORP/BIG BANK CROWN SOVEREIGN LEGAL COMMUNITY =DEBTOR STATEMENT OF CLAIM BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF BC
  • #59- -FORGED COURT RECORD -INSERT BLANK AMOUNT MERS MORTGAGE BANK/WIRE FRAUD FOR FINAL BC SUPREME COURT ORDER owed to the Queen FOR THE 1ST MORTGAGE
  • #60- -MERS IMPERIAL CROWN SOVEREIGN DEBT SLAVE MASTERMINDS
  • #61- TRUSTEE BURNETT-TRUST ACCOUNT BANK ACT-
  • #62- -1995-DEFENDANT BC SUPREME/FAMILY COURT - TARGETED DEBTOR AFFADAVIT
  • #63- -1995 FINAL BC SUPREME COURT TAMPERED TRANSCRIPTS -ORDER
  • #64- -BC LAND TITLES CORRUPTION/FORGED DEED MILL
  • #65- -INTRO BROKEN CHAIN OF TITLE 1989-2011 CIBC/BC &AB LAND TITLES -FORGED CHAIN OF OWNERSHIP
  • #66- -1993 VICTRO REGISTRY BIG CORP COMPANY REGISTRY VICTORIA BC
  • #67- -TREASON ALBERTA CROWN -JUDGE HORNER-HARPER-DAVIS-BURNYEAT
  • #68- --1992 BC SUPREME COURT FINAL ORDER/SEPERATION AGREEMENT SIGNED UNDER FALSE PRETENCES/
  • #69- MAXIMUS IGNORED BC SUPREME COURT FOR BIG BANKS AND BIG CORP
  • #70- --MASTERMIND JUSTICE KAREN HORNER BANKRUPTCY FORECLOSURE FRAUD HARPER HORNER bloodline calgary queens bench court orders
  • #71- -illegal FLORIDA LEGAL AID IMPERIAL CROWN ESCROWED DEPOSITS /ponzie bank/wire fraud
  • #72- -NATIVE SOVEREIGN BC MASTERMIND MCKEE CDS INSURANCED FRAUD -MASTERMIND MCKEE CONNECTION TO TARGETED VICTIM/WHISTLEBLOWER - FIRST NATION IMMUNITY /TAX FREE/ROYAL LAW
  • #73- -WHO IS THE REAL LINDA GREEN- AGENTS TRANSFER OF ESTATE INCLUDING /MORTGAGED PROPERTY OR FOR SALE OR CONYENANCE
  • #74- --ESTATE ATTACHMENTS MERS DEED OWNERS INCLUDE PENSIONS
  • #75- -2011-SOVERIEGN QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA VERSUS US ROYAL LAW COURT
  • #76- -CROWN SOVERIEGNS COURT ADMINISTRATOR ENFORCING ROYAL LAW -public safety risk assesment
  • #77- -2003 -JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT WITHDRAWL
  • #78- -1995- BUISNESS TRUST ACCOUNTING FRAUD/TRUSTEE FRAUD ALABAMA THE BIRTH OF HMS PONZIE SECURITIES FRAUD AMERICAN HERITGAGE CHURCH LOANS/BONDS PONZIE HEADQUARTERS
  • #79- -1973-2011 BC WEST COAST BIG CORP/WALL STREET CITY HALL CORRUPTION
  • #80- 2005-QUEBEC LINDA DIXON
  • #81- -MAXIMUS US NATIVE INDIAN SOVEREIGN CITIZEN TRUSTS ESTATES US AND CANADA WELFARE QUEENS/BC BMO MORGICIDE
  • #82- -2011 CIBC/ JANICE WEEKS KATONA
  • #83- =ILLEGAL Canadian BONDS SEIZED BY IRS
  • #84- -1992 IRS SEIZED CANADIAN BONDS SOVERIEGN GROUP RECOVERY CORRUPTION -PREMEIR CAPTITALTRUST -JANCICE WEEKS KATONA
  • 61-US NATIVE INDIAN SOVEREIGN TRUSTS 8-Premier Benefit Capital Trust CONNECTED TO CIBC DAVIS scheme, which defrauded investors of more than $7.5 million; two of the principles
  • 62-NATIVE SOVEREIGN -BC/ALBERTA/SAN FRAN JAIL SIGNATURES-FLORIDA'S MERS LINDA GREEN/BC CLERK/ALBERTA JUDGE AGENT/OWNER OF ILLEGAL CANADIAN COMPANIES KINGSCROFT/KENDAX/658 AKA LINDA GREEN/JOYCE KENDALL
  • #85- -AB =REGISTARS CORRUPTION OF SOUTH ALBERTA LAND TITLES
  • #86- --BC/ALBERTA WELFARE MERS QUEENS SOVEREIGN DOUBLE deed forgers
  • #87- --CANADA TRUST LIEN 1973-1ST MORTGAGE /DEED OF TRUST SUN LIFE OF CANADA GROUP MORTGAGE CANADIAN APPENDIX #AHISTORY
  • #88- --BC FORGED WRITS/CREDITORS FEDERAL ATTACHMENTS
  • #89- --2010 ACCOUNTING FRAUD COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL BONAVENTURE COURT SOLD NOV
  • #90- -RBC MUTUAL FUNDS SIEZED
  • #91- -SUNLIFE PENSION SEIZED-SUNLIFE 1ST MORTGAGE FRAUD
  • #92- -2009 SUNLIFE OF CANADA/RBC/BMO/CIBC /ATB CROWN/BANK OF CANADA/ organized mortgage fraud
  • #93- TORONTO DOMINION MORTGAGE FRAUD DISCHARGE CLAIM GARTH BAILEY
  • #94- -1992 3 PARTY LIABILITY LEGAL AID/ CIBC -FALSE LIEN /FAKE INJURY SETTLEMENT(3RD PARTY)
  • #95 a- illegal atttach TELEVECTOR
  • #95b- --illegal atttach EVERGREEN CREDIT UNION/
  • #95c- -illegal atttach CIBC
  • #95d- --illegal atttach -BMO
  • #95-e -illegal atttach MAXIMUS
  • #95f- -illegal atttach STOLT SEAFARMS
  • #95g- -2003--illegal atttach WITHDRAWN STOLT SEAFARMS ATTACH
  • #96 - =ILLEGAL writs
  • #96a- -LEGAL AID ALBERTA/BC AUTO ATTACHED WRITS OF FRAUD
  • #96b- AJ- ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 34-38 SUNLIFE OF CANADA
  • #96c- -FX ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 44-48
  • #96d- -BM ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 39-43
  • #96e- -CQ ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 49-53
  • #96f- -DH ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 54-63
  • #96g- -DX ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 64-68
  • #96h- -ER ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 69 -73
  • #96i- -EW ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 74-78
  • #96 j- FX ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 84- 88
  • #96k- -GD ILLEGAL WRIT 1989 89- 93
  • #97- -EARL H PACE TRUSTS investigation
  • #97b- 93-WHO IS THE REAL FLORIDA MR BRUCE GRANT BONAVENTURE
  • #98- -WHO IS THE REAL FLORIDA E ERNEST HARPSTER ??? IS HE ALIVE OR DEAD
  • #99- -2007 LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDING
  • #100- -BC MAXIMUS /MEP ALBERTA IN CONTEMPT OF JUTICE MEIKLEMS FINAL ORDER
  • #101- -CANADA /US MERS ROBO SIGNERS MERS/MAXIMUS LINDA GREENS SIGNATURES OF EXTORATION
  • #101b- - MERS CRA/WELFARE LINDA DIXON AFFADAVIT
  • #101c- -FLORIDA TRUST SUN LIFE PENSION WRIT 1989- AJ LINDA GREEN-DIXON
  • #101d- -PASCO COUNTY FLORIDA EARL H PACE TRUST
  • #102- S CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MILLER
  • #103- ORLANDO FLORIDA BANKRUPTCY COURT
  • #104- CANADA JUDICIAL SECURITIES SOVEREIGN - JUDGE KAREN HORNER PRIME MINISTER HARPERS COUSIN
  • #105- IMPERIAL CRA WELFARE MERS QUEEN SOVEREIGN LEHMAM LINDA GREEN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS GOAT POO
  • #106- WHO IS THE REAL MR BRUCE GRANT BONAVENTURE? THE TRUTH BEHIND SW CALGARY REAL ESTATE TAX SHELTER BONAVENTURE COURT AKA COMPLEX AND GARTH BAILEY HMS/BRIXON GROUP PONZIE
  • #107- KENDAX WHO IS THE REAL JOYCE KENDAL ?????New Page
  • #108- JOYCE KENDAL KENDAX LTD ROBO SIGNED florida judge jennerman
  • #109- 1969 BC LAND TITLES CHAIN OF TITLE BROKEN BY FORGERY DATING BACK TO 1969JUDICIAL FEDERAL LIENS AND ATTACHMENTS OF INCOME AND PENSIONS ON INTERNATIONAL WATERS INCLUDING FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS AND INTEREST CHARGES
  • CROWN SOVERIEGNS IN COLLUSION WITH US MAXIMUS HMS/BRIXON GROUP ponzie MERS PAPER CRA/maximus/BIG CORP PAPER TERRORISM -across state lines
  • #110- ALBERTA SOVEREIGN TRUSTEE FRAUD
  • #111- 2003-WILEY prefab home -albertaDIAMOND VALLEY MANUFACTURING
  • #112- 95-INTRO 1973/ 1974 - CAMPBELL RIVER TD/CANADA TRUST MORTGAGE FRAUD TITLE C1229- BC GOVERMENT FORGED LIEN PURSUANT TO BC PROVINCIAL HOME AQUISTION ACT
  • #113- BRIAN WILEY AND MELANIE WILEY ALBERTA CONDO SELLERS
  • #114- -LEGAL SOVEREIGN AID SOCIETY 2011 MAXIMUS LTD LEGAL SOVEREIGN AID SOCIETY ponzie PAPER CRA TERRORISM -across state linesCANADIAN FEDS/USPENSION PONZIE SOVEREIGN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CLEAN UP FUND
  • #115- -Trust law From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • SOVEREIGN BUNGA
  • #116- -LEGAL SOVEREIGN AID SOCIETY SOVEREIGN CITY HALL MASTERMINDED GOAT POO SECURITIES CONTRACT SOVEREIGN ROYAL LAW 1988 BMO 1ST MORTGAGE UNDER OATH THE CANADIAN SOVEREIGN MERS WELFARE QUEENS CROWN CLERK PONZIE
  • #117- -LEGAL SOVEREIGN AID SOCIETY SOVEREIGN CITY HALL SWINDLEGATE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SOVEREIGN AID SOCIETY
  • #118- -LEGAL SOVEREIGN AID SOCIETY ILLEGAL CROWN BANKRUPTCY AND CROWN FORECLOSURE FRAUD 100% GOAT POO CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS USING US FLORIDA DISTRICT COURTS AS THEIR SOVEREIGN GET AWAY CARS FLORIDA 25MAY1995 CAPITAL JANICE WEEKS KATONA church ponzie BC
  • #119- 1995 BC SUPREME COURT JUDGE MEIKLEM'S FINAL DEAL-JUNE 19
  • #120- -JUDICIAL CROWN SOVERIEGNS -THE CLERK
  • #121- MAXIMUS INSURANCE INDUSTRY NEEDS IMMEDIATE SOVEREIGN REFORM AND STRICTER LAWS
  • US JUDGES WHO ACTUALLY GETS IT
  • FLORIDA EARL PACE TRUST
  • FORGED TRANSFER OF JOINT COMPANY ESTATE
  • 2009-ALBERTA GRANTEE-GAS COMPANY OWNS WILE-Y ESTATE
  • 2010- CEASE AND DESIST -BSIG BONAVENTURE / CHURCH PONZIE INVESTORS GROUP
  • I WANT THIS JUDGES OPINION
  • WEST COAST INTERNATIONAL community corruption
  • DRUGS/WASHINGTON STATE/BC CONNECTION
  • VAAS
  • 2002 PROPERTY CALGARY
  • 2002 ALBERTA IO ACRES
  • SOVEREIGN CITIZENS INTERNATIONAL REGULATORS /PROSECUTORS NEEDED ASAP
  • SCARED AND HIDING
  • 56.1. Identity documents 56.1 (1) Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, procures to be made, possesses, transfers, sells or offers for sale an identity document that relates or purports to relate, in whole or in part, to another pers
  • 58. Fraudulent use of certificate of citizenship 58. (1) Every one who, while in or out of Canada,
  • 46. (1) High treason Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
  • 46. (3) Canadian citizen (3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian citizen or a person who owes allegiance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,
  • •83.02 - Financing of Terrorism •83.02. Providing or collecting property for certain activities
  • 83.03. Providing, making available, etc., property or services for terrorist purposes
  • 83.04. Using or possessing property for terrorist purposes
  • 83.18. Participation in activity of terrorist group 83.18 (1) Every one who knowingly participates in or contributes to, directly or indirectly, any activity of a terrorist group for the purpose of enhancing the ability of any terrorist group to facilitat
  • 83.19. Facilitating terrorist activity 83.19 (1) Every one who knowingly facilitates a terrorist activity is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
  • 83.2. Commission of offence for terrorist group 83.2 Every one who commits an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a terrorist group is guilty of an indictable offence
  • 83.21. Instructing to carry out activity for terrorist group 83.21 (1) Every person who knowingly instructs, directly or indirectly, any person to carry out any activity for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a terrorist group, for
  • 83.22. Instructing to carry out terrorist activity 83.22 (1) Every person who knowingly instructs, directly or indirectly, any person to carry out a terrorist activity is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.
  • 83.23. Harbouring or concealing 83.23 Every one who knowingly harbours or conceals any person whom he or she knows to be a person who has carried out or is likely to carry out a terrorist activity, for the purpose of enabling the person to facilitate or c
  • 182. Dead body 182. Every one who(b) improperly or indecently interferes with or offers any indignity to a dead human body or human remains, whether buried or not,
  • New Page
  • 181. Spreading false news 181. Every one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment fo
  • 131. Perjury 131. (1) Subject to subsection (3), every one commits perjury who, with intent to mislead, makes before a person who is authorized by law to permit it to be made before him a false statement under oath or solemn affirmation, by affidavit, sol
  • 133. Corroboration 133. No person shall be convicted of an offence under section 132 on the evidence of only one witness unless the evidence of that witness is corroborated in a material particular by evidence that implicates the accused.
  • 136. Witness giving contradictory evidence 136. (1) Every one who, being a witness in a judicial proceeding, gives evidence with respect to any matter of fact or knowledge and who subsequently, in a judicial proceeding, gives evidence that is contrary to
  • 137. Fabricating evidence 137. Every one who, with intent to mislead, fabricates anything with intent that it shall be used as evidence in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, by any means other than perjury or incitement to perjury is guilty of a
  • 138. Offences relating to affidavits
  • 139. Obstructing justice 139. (1) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in a judicial proceeding,(2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1)
  • New Page
  • 140. Public mischief 140. (1) Every one commits public mischief who, with intent to mislead, causes a peace officer to enter on or continue an investigation by (a) making a false statement that accuses some other person of having committed an offence;
  • New Page
  • 142. Corruptly taking reward for recovery of goods 142. Every one who corruptly accepts any valuable consideration, directly or indirectly, under pretence or on account of helping any person to recover anything obtained by the commission of an indictable
  • 119. Bribery of judicial officers, etc. 119. (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years who
    • a suspicious transaction report.---When you decide to open an offshore bank or brokerage account, whether in Switzerland, Cayman, Belize, Panama or anywhere else… one of the most typical requirements is for a bank reference letter.
  • New Page
  • the fish rots from the head
  • New Page
  • PBCT CONTRACTS DURHAM TRUST JANICE KATONA WEEKS
  • New Page
  • 2011 -NOV -VKD RESPONDS RE: DURHAM TRUST="Deliberate Bankrupting" "National Security Agency" and "NASA" associated with Ariel Life Systems (of the astronaut-space program) further connecting into the BASEBALL and FOOTBALL groups with a John D' Aquisto and
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • international body dedicated to information-sharing and an international court
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • De Schutter also warned Canada would face tough questions when it gets a peer review of its human rights record next year at the United
  • the account was a sweeping facilaty
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan,
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • New Page
  • United States Patriot; wife of murdered Colonel AKA WESTCOAST MAXIMUS WELFARE QUEEN /CITY HALL ESCORT
  • New Page
  • coast guard
  • Secret “Occult Economy” Coming Out of the Shadows?
  • New Page
  • creation of special committees to address the "legal risks."
  • John Aloyisius Dolan, 1850s-1890s, Iowa
  • And $288 million is a lot to lose on one investment. Especially when it’s money that Canadians are expecting to retire on.
  • VK DURHAM INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTIONa policy not approved by Congress remainS UNacceptable. when your own members flirt with mutiny, you have to know you’ve touched a raw nerve.
  • JUDGE BONNER
  • The Crown is not bound by laws passed in Parliament.
  • INDIAN AFFAIRS- NWT NEW AGE ECONOMY
 MERS/MAXIMUS High-tech robbery
ENDLESS DEFAULT FEES OWED TO FMEP/MAXIMUS/WELFARE QUEENS IN FLORIDA/CALGARY


Missing assignments or multiple assignments of the same instrument filed in the public records are a direct result of multi-pledging and the use of the same collateral, the mortgage loan, to poolinto securities or pledge for other financing and should be viewed as an overt act of fraud when encountered.

Picture

multi-pledging and the use of the same collateral,

the use of the same collateral, the mortgage loan, to pool into securities or pledge for other financing

Picture
Picture
Picture
 
Picture
Picture
Picture


2007
VICTORIA BC
TITLE EG56733

Picture
2009
NEW WESTMINISTER
TITLE EG56733
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

                  SALE CONVEYANCE OR TRANSFER OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY

Picture
Picture
Picture

1-PAT FIELD- CONFLICT OF INTEREST/MASTERMIND

LEGAL AID-LEGAL AID/CONTRACT UNDER ASSIGNMENT TO THE MINISTER OF GAINS

INTENTIONAL NEGLIGENCE/INCOMPETENCE

1988-ORIGINAL TRANSFER OF MATRIMONIAL ESTATE AS JOINT TENANTS FOR $45,0000



329. (1) Husband Or Wife � Subject to subsection (2), no husband or wife, during cohabitation, commits theft of anything that is by law the property of the other. (2) Theft by spouse while living apart � A husband or wife commits theft who, intending to desert or on deserting the other or while living apart from the other, fraudulently takes or converts anything that is by law the property of the other in a manner that, if it were done by another person, would be theft. (3) Assisting or receiving � Every one commits theft who, during cohabitation of a husband and wife, knowingly (a) assists either of them in dealing with anything that is by law the property of the other in a manner that would be theft if they were not married, or; (b) receives from either of them anything that is by law the property of the other and has been obtained from the other by dealing with it in a manner that would be theft if they were not married. . . . . .

COUNT 1-CC CODE

127. (1) Disobeying Order of Court � Every one who, without lawful excuse, disobeys a lawful order made by a court of justice or by a person or body of persons authorized by any Act to make or give the order, other than an order for the payment of money, is, unless a punishment or other mode of proceeding is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. (2) Attorney General of Canada may act � Where the order referred to in subsection (1) was made in proceedings instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that Government, any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene that order may be instituted and conducted in like manner. . . . . .

COUNT 2-CC CODE

COUNT CC CODE-3

278. Spouse May Be Charged � A husband or wife may be charged with an offence under section 271, 272 or 273 in respect of his or her spouse, whether or not the spouses were living together at the time the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge occurred.

COUNT 4-CC CODE

423. (1) Intimidation � Every one who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to abstain from doing anything that he has a lawful right to do, or to do anything that he has a lawful right to abstain from doing, (a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or his spouse or children, or injures his property, (b) intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of that person by threats that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other injury will be done to or punishment inflicted on him or a relative of his, or that the property of any of them will be damaged, (c) persistently follows that person about from place to place, (d) hides any tools, clothes or other property owned or used by that person, or deprives him of them or hinders him in the use of them, (e) with one or more other persons, follows that person, in a disorderly manner, on a highway, (f) besets or watches the dwelling-house or place where that person resides, works, carries on business or happens to be, or (g) blocks or obstructs a highway, is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. (2) Exception � A person who attends at or near or approaches a dwelling-house or place, for the purpose only of obtaining or communicating information, does not watch or beset within the meaning of this section. . . . . .

COUNT 5-CC CODE

810. (1) Where Injury or Damage Feared � An information may be laid before a justice by or on behalf of any person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person will cause personal injury to him or her or to his or her spouse or child or will damage his or her property. (2) Duty of justice � A justice who receives an information under subsection (1) shall cause the parties to appear before him or before a summary conviction court having jurisdiction in the same territorial division. (3) Adjudication � The justice or the summary conviction court before which the parties appear may, if satisfied by the evidence adduced that the person on whose behalf the information was laid has reasonable grounds for his or her fears, (a) order that the defendant enter into a recognizance, with or without sureties, to keep the peace and be of good behavior for any period that does not exceed twelve months, and comply with such other reasonable conditions prescribed in the recognizance, including the conditions set out in subsections (3.1) and (3.2), as the court considers desirable for securing the good conduct of the defendant; or (b) commit the defendant to prison for a term not exceeding twelve months if he or she fails or refuses to enter into the recognizance. (3.1) Conditions � Before making an order under subsection (3), the justice or the summary conviction court shall consider whether it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of the defendant or of any other person, to include as a condition of the recognizance that the defendant be prohibited from possessing any firearm or any ammunition or explosive substance for any period of time specified in the recognizance and that the defendant surrender any firearms acquisition certificate that the accused possesses and, where the justice or summary conviction court decides that it is not desirable, in the interests of the safety of the defendant or of any other person, for the defendant to possess any of those things, the justice or summary conviction court may add the appropriate condition to the recognizance. (3.2) Idem � Before making an order under subsection (3), the justice or the summary conviction court shall consider whether it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of the informant, of the person on whose behalf the information was laid or of that person�s spouse or child, as the case may be, to add either or both of the following conditions to the recognizance, namely, a condition (a) prohibiting the defendant from being at, or within a distance specified in the recognizance from, a place specified in the recognizance where the person on whose behalf the information was laid or that person�s spouse or child, as the case may be, is regularly found; and (b) prohibiting the defendant from communicating, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, with the person on whose behalf the information was laid or that person�s spouse or child, as the case may be. (4) Forms � A recognizance and committal to prison in default of recognizance under subsection (3) may be in Forms 32 and 23, respectively. (4.1) Modification of recognizance � The justice or the summary conviction court may, on application of the informant or the defendant, vary the conditions fixed in the recognizance. (5) Procedure � The provisions of this Part apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to proceedings under this section. 1991, c. 40, s. 33; 1994, c. 44, s. 81; 1995, c. 22, s. 8. 810.1 (1) Where fear of sexual offence � Any person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit an offence under section 151, 152, 155 or 159, subsection 160(2) or (3), section 170 or 171, subsection 173(2) or section 271, 272 or 273, in respect of one or more persons who are under the age of fourteen years, may lay an information before a provincial court judge, whether or not the person or persons in respect of whom it is feared that the offence will be committed are named. (2) Duty of provincial court judge � A provincial court judge who receives an information under subsection (1) shall cause the parties to appear before the provincial court judge. (3) Adjudication � The provincial court judge before whom the parties appear may, if satisfied by the evidence adduced that the informant has reasonable grounds for the fear, order the defendant to enter into a recognizance and comply with the conditions fixed by the provincial court judge, including a condition prohibiting the defendant from engaging in any activity that involves contact with persons under the age of fourteen years and prohibiting the defendant from attending a public park or public swimming area where persons under the age of fourteen years are present or can reasonably be expected to be present, or a daycare centre, school ground, playground or community centre, for any period fixed by the provincial court judge that does not exceed twelve months. (3.1) Refusal to enter into recognizance � The provincial court judge may commit the defendant to prison for a term not exceeding twelve months if the defendant fails or refuses to enter into the recognizance. (4) Judge may vary recognizance � The provincial court judge may, on application of the informant or the defendant, vary the conditions fixed in the recognizance. (5) Other provisions to apply � Subsections 810(4) and (5) apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to recognizances made under this section. 1993, c. 45, s. 11; 1997, c. 18, s. 113(2). 810.2 (1) Where fear of serious personal injury offence � Any person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit a serious personal injury offence, as that expression is defined in section 752, may, with the consent of the Attorney General, lay information before a provincial court judge, whether or not the person or persons in respect of whom it is feared that the offence will be committed are named. (2) Duty of provincial court judge � A provincial court judge who receives an information under subsection (1) may cause the parties to appear before the provincial court judge. (3) Adjudication � The provincial court judge before whom the parties appear may, if satisfied by the evidence adduced that the informant has reasonable grounds for the fear, order that the defendant enter into a recognizance to keep the peace and be of good behavior for any period that does not exceed twelve months and to comply with any other reasonable conditions prescribed in the recognizance, including the conditions set out in subsection (5) and (6), that the provincial court judge considers desirable for securing the good conduct of the defendant. (4) Refusal to enter into recognizance � The provincial court judge may commit the defendant to prison for a term not exceeding twelve months if the defendant fails or refuses to enter into the recognizance. (5) Conditions � firearms � Before making an order under subsection (3), the provincial court judge shall consider whether it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of the defendant or of any other person, to include as a condition of the recognizance that the defendant be prohibited from possessing firearm or any ammunition or explosive substance for any period of time specified in the recognizance and that the defendant surrender any firearms acquisition certificate that the defendant possesses, and where the provincial court judge decides that it is not desirable, in the interests of the safety of the defendant or any other person, for the defendant to possess any of those things, the provincial court judge may add the appropriate condition to the recognizance. Conditional Amendment On the later of the coming into force of s. 810.2(5) of the Code as enacted by 1997, c. 17, s. 9 and ss. 810(3.1) - (3.12) of the Code as enacted by 1995, c. 39, s. 157, s. 810.2(5) is replaced by the following: (5) Conditions � firearms � Before making an order under subsection (3), the provincial court judge shall consider whether it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of the defendant or of any other person, to include as a condition of the recognizance that the defendant be prohibited from possessing any firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance, or all such things, for any period specified in the recognizance, and where the provincial court judge decides that it is so desirable, the provincial court judge shall add such a condition to the recognizance. (5.1) Surrender, etc. � Where the provincial court judge adds a condition described in subsection (5) to a recognizance order, the provincial court judge shall specify in the order the manner and method by which (a) the things referred to in that are in the possession of the defendant shall be surrendered, disposed of, detained, stored or dealt with; and (b) the authorization, licences and registration certificates held by the defendant shall be surrendered. (5.2) Reasons � Where the provincial court judge does not add a condition described in subsection (5) to a recognizance order, the provincial court judge shall include in the record a statement of the reasons for not adding the condition. 1997, c. 17, s. 9(2). Not in force at date of publication. (6) Conditions � reporting and monitoring � Before making an order under subsection (3), the provincial court judge shall consider whether it is desirable to include as a condition of the recognizance that the defendant report to the correctional authority of a province or to an appropriate police authority, and where the provincial court judge decides that it is desirable for the defendant to so report, the provincial court judge may add the appropriate condition to the recognizance. (7) Variance of conditions � The provincial court judge may, on application of the informant, of the Attorney General or of the defendant, vary the conditions fixed in the recognizance. (8) Other provisions to apply � Subsections 810(4) and (5) apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to recognizance made under this section. 1997, c. 23, s. 9(1). Not in force at date of publication.

COUNT 6 CC CODE-ON PAPER

290. (1) Bigamy � Every one commits �bigamy� who (a) in Canada, (i) being married, goes through a form of marriage with another person, (ii) knowing that another person is married, goes through a form of marriage with that person, or (iii) on the same day or simultaneously, goes through a form of marriage with more than one person; or (b) being a Canadian citizen resident in Canada leaves Canada with intent to do anything mentioned in subparagraphs (a)(i) to (iii) and, pursuant thereto, does outside Canada anything mentioned in those subparagraphs in circumstances mentioned therein. (2) Matters of defence � No person commits bigamy by going through a form of marriage if (a) that person in good faith and on reasonable grounds believes that his spouse is dead, (b) the spouse of that person has been continuously absent from him for seven years immediately preceding the time when he goes through the form of marriage, unless he knew that his spouse was alive at any time during those seven years, (c) that person has been divorced from the bond of the first marriage, or (d) the former marriage has been declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction. (3) Incompetency no defence � Where a person is alleged to have committed bigamy, it is not a defence that the parties would, if unmarried, have been incompetent to contract marriage under the law of the place where the offence is alleged to have been committed. (4) Validity presumed � Every marriage or form of marriage shall, for the purpose of this section, be deemed to be valid unless the accused establishes that it was invalid. (5) Act or omission by accused � No act or omission on the part of an accused who is charged with bigamy invalidates a marriage or form of marriage that is otherwise valid.

COUNT 7-CC CODE

264. (1) Criminal harassment � No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them. (2) Prohibited conduct � The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of (a) repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them; (b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them; (c) besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or (d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family. (3) Punishment � Every person who contravenes this section is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. (4) Factors to be considered � Where a person is convicted of an offence under this section, the court imposing the sentence on the person shall consider as an aggravating factor that, at the time the offence was committed, the person contravened (a) the terms or conditions of an order made pursuant to section 161 or a recognizance entered into pursuant to section 810, 810.1 or 810.2; or (b) the terms or conditions of any other order or recognizance made or entered into under the common law or a provision of this or any other Act of Parliament or of a province that is similar in effect to an order or recognizance referred to in paragraph (a) (5) Reasons � Where the court is satisfied of the existence of an aggravating factor referred to in subsection (4), but decides not to give effect to it for sentencing purposes, the court shall give reasons for its decision. R.S. 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 37; 1993, c. 45, s. 2; 1997, c. 16, s. 4; c. 17, s. 9(3).

COUNT 8-CC CODE

264.1 (1) Uttering Threats � Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person. (2) Punishment � Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months. (3) Idem � Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(b) or (c) (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. R.S. 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 38; 1994, c. 44, s. 16. . . . . .

COUNT 10 CC-CODE

172. (1) Corrupting Children � Every one who, in the home of a child, participates in adultery or sexual immorality or indulges in habitual drunkenness or any other form of vice, and thereby endangers the morals of the child or renders the home an unfit place for the child to be in, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. (2) [Repealed R.S. 1985, c. 19 (3d Supp.), s. 6] (3) Definition of �child� � For the purposes of this section, �child� means a person who is or appears to be under the age of eighteen years. (4) Who may institute prosecutions � No proceedings shall be commenced under subsection (1) without the consent of the Attorney General, unless they are instituted by or at the instance of a recognized society for the protection of children or by an officer of a juvenile court. R.S. 1985, c. 19 (3d Supp.), s. 6. . . . . .

COUNT 11 -CC CODE

215. (1) Duty of Persons to Provide Necessaries � Every one is under a legal duty (a) as a parent, foster parent, guardian or head of a family, to provide necessaries of life for a child under the age of sixteen years; (b) as a married person, to provide necessaries of life to his spouse; and (c) to provide necessaries of life to a person under his charge if that person (i) is unable, by reason of detention, age, illness, mental disorder or other cause, to withdraw himself from that charge, and (ii) is unable to provide himself with necessaries of life. (2) Offence � Every one commits an offence who, being under a legal duty within the meaning of subsection (1), fails without lawful excuse, the proof of which lies on him, to perform that duty, if (a) with respect to a duty imposed by paragraph (l)(a) or (b), (i) the person to whom the duty is owed is in destitute or necessitous circumstances, or (ii) the failure to perform the duty endangers the life of the person to whom the duty is owed, or causes or is likely to cause the health of that person to be endangered permanently; or (b) with respect to a duty imposed by paragraph (1)(c), the failure to perform the duty endangers the life of the person to whom the duty is owed or causes or is likely to cause the health of that person to be injured permanently. (3) Punishment � Every one who commits an offence under subsection (2) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. (4) Presumptions � For the purpose of proceedings under this section, (a) evidence that a person has cohabited with a person of the opposite sex or has in any way recognized that person as being his spouse is, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, proof that they are lawfully married; (b) evidence that a person has in any way recognized a child as being his child is, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, proof that the child is his child; (c) evidence that a person has left his spouse and has failed, for a period of any one month subsequent to the time of his so leaving, to make provision for the maintenance of his spouse or for the maintenance of any child of his under the age of sixteen years is, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, proof that he has failed without lawful excuse to provide necessaries of life for them; and (d) the fact that a spouse or child is receiving or has received necessaries of life from another person who is not under a legal duty to provide them is not a defence. 1991, c. 43, s. 9, Schedule, item 2. . . . . .

Picture

High-tech robbery ring soars, then unravels

A gang of Asian mobsters hits West Coast electronics companies before tripping up

Sunday, December 26, 1999
By Mark Larabee of The Oregonian staff

They planned the hit for months.

As darkness fell on Oregon's Silicon Forest, an unsuspecting janitor unlocked a door for three sharply dressed, smiling job applicants.

Then, the smiles turned to screams.

Anne Yan Mak, a ruthless 19-year-old, and two cohorts waved high-powered, semi-automatic pistols at the janitor, ordering him to find the manager.

It was after business hours Oct. 4, 1995, at Supercom Electronics in Beaverton. The three had used the same lie to get into the building before, to get a lay of the land, eliminate surprises.

They forced the janitor and manager into the back room and tied them up as four other gunmen scoured the building for security guards. They needed time, and they didn't want anyone tripping them up by calling police or setting off the alarm.

By the time the building sweep was complete, about a half-dozen other gang members were filling Rubbermaid tubs with new computer parts. The robbers backed a truck up to the loading dock and, for more than an hour, looted the company of assorted hardware.

Their getaway was clean.

Supercom was one of about 30 West Coast electronics company robberies from 1994 to 1996 that, according to federal indictments, were tied to a gang of Asian mobsters controlled by John That Luong. It was the gang's only Oregon robbery and eventually led the FBI to Luong's front door, cracking his entire network.

More importantly, the case alerted the Justice Department to the fact that Portland and the lucrative Silicon Forest are potential targets for organized criminals.

Federal prosecutors say Luong was puppet master of a loosely knit organized crime family made up of roving groups of thugs.

They called themselves "The Company," and their trade was brutal strong-arm robberies, mostly of computer-parts manufacturers and distributors, according to a federal indictment filed in San Francisco. They also dealt heroin, shipping it from California to street dealers in Massachusetts and New York City, the indictment states.

It took government agents more than a year to figure out that the robberies -- from San Diego to Portland and as far as Minnesota -- were done by the same outfit.

Information about Luong was taken from federal indictments and interviews with prosecutors. His San Francisco attorney did not return numerous telephone calls.

Prosecutors said Luong and his gang began the robberies in mid-1994. They hit three Silicon Valley computer-makers in the last half of the year, and in January 1995 they hit three more.

Like other Asian crime gangs nationwide, Luong was tapping into a growing black market for computer parts -- especially expensive memory chips -- which are difficult, if not impossible, to trace.

The robbers followed a similar and potentially dangerous pattern. They would pick a target and go in under false pretenses to figure out security systems and building layouts. Then for the robbery, a small group would enter with guns after most of the employees had gone home, secure the place and let the rest of the robbery crew inside to move merchandise.

In March 1995, they robbed four companies. As word spread among California law enforcement that the robberies were becoming more frequent, Luong branched out of Silicon Valley.

On May 16, 1995, his gang took over Centon Electronics in Irvine, Calif., south of Los Angeles and filled two U-Haul trucks with $10 million worth of memory chips, said Chris Johnson, an assistant U.S. attorney in Los Angeles.

A botched robbery

A month later, Mak, Polo Sok and another Asian man, all carrying guns, entered Maximus Computers, a computer parts distributor in Monrovia, Calif., in north Los Angeles County. They hadn't even finished tying up the employees when police, alerted by a silent alarm, arrived. According to court records, Sok and Mak took an employee hostage to escape. The hostage was released unharmed.

By the end of summer, Luong's soldiers had robbed more than a dozen firms, prosecutors said.

Computer companies are but one target of Asian crime syndicates. Many similar groups are operating nationwide, officials say.

"These guys are entrepreneurs," said Special Agent Peter Won, who heads the FBI's Asian organized crime squad in San Francisco. The sophisticated gangs are into software piracy, loan sharking, drugs, bank fraud, protection rackets and home invasion robberies.

"They'll go into anything that will make them a profit," Won said. "Some groups their color is red, some their color is blue. Asians, their color is green."

To combat the growing organized crime problem, the U.S. Justice Department designated strike-force cities so investigators and prosecutors would specialize in organized crime, eliminate duplicate efforts and better communicate to keep everyone informed.

Portland's strike force was put in place in March 1999, mostly in response to Supercom. "This case was an eye-opener for law enforcement in Oregon," said Fred Petti, an assistant U.S. attorney in Portland who oversees the strike force. It includes two federal prosecutors and a Justice Department trial attorney, who are supported by FBI agents and police agencies throughout the state.

In Oregon, federal agents feed on a steady diet of Asian and Russian mob activity, and Mexican, Central and South American drug trafficking, said Special Agent Dan Wright, who heads the FBI's organized crime and drug squad in Portland.

Coming to Portland

By mid-1995, with the FBI turning up the heat in California, Luong and his lieutenants looked to the Northwest. They knew Portland, with its own growing technology industry, wasn't getting much attention from the U.S. Justice Department's organized crime section, Petti said.

After the botched Maximus job, during which gang members took hostages to escape, Luong sent Sok, 21, and Kha Khiev, 26, to Portland to lie low and scout another big score. When they arrived in July 1995, the two were flush with cash, some of it their take from Centon and some seed money from Luong to get set up, Petti said.

Sok had been in and out of jails his whole life, and both he and Khiev were longtime gangbangers and notorious troublemakers. "If any of these guys was destined for this, it was Kha Khiev," Petti said.

In Portland, Sok and Khiev hooked up with Thinh Duy Nguyen, a Luong associate. Nguyen, 28, had a job at a computer company and was married with children. As the local contact, he acted as the gang's travel agent. He booked hotel and airplane reservations for crew members. He rented the truck and a safe house in the 6700 block of Southeast Kelly Street in Portland, and he helped find the guns used in the robbery, according to a federal indictment.

But Sok and Khiev were in no hurry. They were young men with a lot of cash, more interested in meeting women and partying, Petti said. They did a few home-invasion robberies to make ends meet while they planned the Supercom robbery.

"They're real smart; they took their time; they had a safe house; they invested money into the project," Petti said.

Robbery day

But after two months, Luong sent a lieutenant, Michael Huynh, 33, to Portland to get things rolling, upset that Sok and Khiev hadn't picked a robbery target.

Huynh and his chief deputy cased Supercom after picking it at random. They bought guns off the street, saw that a moving truck was rented and had everything set by late September for Luong's soldiers to fly to Portland.

Mak, who had gone underground after the Maximus kidnapping, was called to help.

Mak was an unlikely member for a gang of strong-arm robbers. Just 19, she was a straight-A student in a Stockton business school when she was recruited through a friend. She had just broken up with her boyfriend and was devastated, according to investigators, and wanted to show him that she was tougher than he was.

Luong knew of the heightened awareness among high-tech companies that they were potential targets, federal prosecutors said. He wanted Mak to help the gang enter the buildings, figuring a woman would look less suspicious. By now she'd done two robberies in California, and with each, she got braver and braver.

"She was just a bad, bad girl," said Dawn King, one of the Portland FBI agents who investigated the Supercom robbery. "The witnesses described her as very cool."

The morning of the Supercom robbery, the gang, with Huynh in charge, met at the Kelly Street safe house. They set up a makeshift altar, lit candles and prayed for prosperity, King said.

Huynh watched the robbery from a car across the street. By the time Mak and the first entry crew smiled their way past the janitor, Mak was fully into playing the part. "She had never handled a gun in her life when she goes in with a loaded 9 mm and points it at this woman's face," Petti said.

The robbery went off without a hitch. But after so many months of planning, Luong and his top operatives were disappointed, Petti said. They hoped for another haul of millions, but instead of lucrative memory chips, they wound up with $350,000 worth of hard drives and other hardware that wasn't so valuable. This robbery certainly didn't measure up to the $10 million Centon job.

Still, Luong already had a buyer, an independent computer retailer. The two arrived in Portland a few days after the robbery. They agreed on a price, loaded the stuff into four vehicles and headed to Stockton, Calif., where Luong based his West Coast operations.

Blockbuster bust

In late 1995 King was assigned to run down a tip in a narcotics case the FBI was working in California.

Before Luong was tied to the robberies, the FBI was investigating him for heroin trafficking and had installed a wiretap on his telephone. There was a lot of talk about various drug transactions, according to the indictment. But an agent reviewing recordings of the calls overheard talk about a robbery in Oregon and a guy named "Paulo."

King, now 38 and retired, had been an FBI agent for five years and was working in Portland on Squad 5 -- organized crime and drugs -- after several years as a part-time FBI airplane pilot.

Because the Supercom robbery had gone down just days before, investigators figured a guy named Paulo was involved.

That wasn't much to go on, but a few days after the robbery, Beaverton police received a tip from an employee at a truck rental company that a truck had been returned with computer parts inside.

It was the break the agents needed. Thinh Duy Nguyen, Luong's Portland connection, had rented the truck in his own name. Utilities records also showed he was paying for power at two Portland addresses, one a rental property on Kelly Street.

King set up surveillance. There was a lot of traffic at the house, but she and the other agents weren't sure what they were looking for. On a day no one was home, the homeowners gave the agents permission to search the garbage.

"We went through it piece by piece, and another agent pulled up a Blockbuster Video card," King recalled. "It said Polo Sok. We were like, 'Bingo! We got it!' "

Polo was the Paulo they were looking for. Suddenly it made sense.

Sok was wanted on $1 million bond for the Monrovia kidnapping. The FBI and Portland police put the Blockbuster store under surveillance on a tip from the manager that Sok came in every Friday night to rent movies. He showed up as usual, but this time he was arrested. Then he started talking.

The unraveling

The case ballooned from there. Sok told the FBI about the robbery network and named names. The focus of the investigation quickly shifted from drugs to a major organized crime syndicate. It was dubbed "Operation Bytes Dust."

"At first they were using the computer robberies to fund some of the drug operations, but that was so lucrative they started getting heavy into it," King said.

The FBI interrogated Sok. Agents subpoenaed phone records, hotel receipts, bank deposits and records of money transfers. They tracked purchases of homes, cars and a swimming pool. They tied robbers with specific crimes and the crimes with the larger network, with Luong at the top.

"We had voluminous phone records, which tied them all together," King said. "The paper. That's our biggest evidence. It's like a jigsaw puzzle."

The robberies continued, but the robbers got sloppy. On Nov. 11, 1995, Mak and three armed men were arrested at Solomon Technology, a computer parts distributor in Los Angeles, after an employee tripped a silent alarm.

They talked, too. Mak was especially good with details, King said. One by one, the Supercom robbers fell into the government's net.

King arrested Eoung Oeur using old-fashioned police work. The gang knew him only as "Snoop"; no one knew his real name.

The FBI knew only that "Snoop" had flown from Portland to the Bay Area after the Supercom robbery. So they subpoenaed hundreds of passenger names from the airlines for every flight from Oct. 5 to Oct. 8, 1995, between Portland and the Bay Area.

They narrowed it to a few Asian names and matched them with DMV photos, which they showed gang members. All identified Eoung Oeur as "Snoop."

Paying the price

All but one of the Supercom robbers has been captured and pleaded guilty to various charges in the case or the larger conspiracy. After pleading guilty and cooperating, Khiev is serving 6? years for his role in Supercom. Ten other Supercom robbers cooperated as well, which is unheard of in organized crime circles. The information they shared helped bring down a multistate crime network.

"They're people who made a business decision somewhere along the line, and now they're at a crossroads" Petti said.

Mak, Sok and Huynh have pleaded guilty to various charges and await sentencing. They have agreed to serve a minimum of 20 years, reduced penalties for their crimes, in exchange for their testimony against Luong.

Luong and 18 others face federal racketeering, robbery, drug trafficking and weapons charges in San Francisco. He and several others also are charged in Sacramento with money laundering, bank fraud, witness tampering and killing a jewelry store owner during a robbery. Trial begins Jan. 18.

You can reach Mark Larabee at 503-294-7664 or by e-mail at [email protected].
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/99/12/st122602.html


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.