The hearing featured testimony from AIG CEO Edward Liddy.
CENTRAL QUESTION TO THE HEARING NEVER ANSWERED
http://article.wn.com/view/2011/05/25/Identity_Theft_Check_Fraud_Ring_Busted/
AIG:
Where is the Taxpayers Money Going?
ASSETS TRANSFERRED TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE
INTERNATIONAL PRIORITY
Postal Facts
Facts and figures about your
Postal Service
Postal Facts 2012
As the U.S. Postal Service continues its evolution as a forward-thinking,
fast-acting company capable of providing quality products and services for its
customers, it continues to remember and celebrate its roots as the first
national network of communications that literally bound a nation together.
Ours is a proud heritage built on a simple yet profound mission: Connect
every American, every door, every business, everywhere through the simple act of
delivering mail. This idea of universal service is at the heart of a $900
billion industry that drives commerce, plays an integral part of every American
community and remains the greatest value of any post in the
world.
Facts and figures about your
Postal Service
Postal Facts 2012
As the U.S. Postal Service continues its evolution as a forward-thinking,
fast-acting company capable of providing quality products and services for its
customers, it continues to remember and celebrate its roots as the first
national network of communications that literally bound a nation together.
Ours is a proud heritage built on a simple yet profound mission: Connect
every American, every door, every business, everywhere through the simple act of
delivering mail. This idea of universal service is at the heart of a $900
billion industry that drives commerce, plays an integral part of every American
community and remains the greatest value of any post in the
world.
THE CIVIL E-WAR OF 2012
“bodily harm”
means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the
health or comfort
of the person and that is more than merely transient or
trifling in
nature;
means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the
health or comfort
of the person and that is more than merely transient or
trifling in
nature;
BC TAXPAYERS DUPED BY AGENTS OF THE CROWN
1996- CANADIANS CONTROLLED AS CROWN OWNED BRITISH SUBJECTS INSURED BY AIG
Fraud Scheme Starts With Mailbox Thefts
Booming BC natural-gas sector
“Canadian
Forces” means the armed forces of Her Majesty raised by
Canada;
Prince Charles recalls his military service at CFB Gagetown
CFB GAGETOWN, N.B.—
The Canadian Press
Published Monday,
May. 21, 2012 10:38AM EDT
Last updated Monday,
May. 21, 2012 10:59AM EDT
Prince Charles and his wife Camilla have kicked off their Canadian tour at
the same New Brunswick military base where the Duke of Cornwall trained as a
military pilot.
Charles said he was delighted to begin his trip at Canadian Forces Base
Gagetown, where he flew as a naval helicopter pilot in the 1970s “at an exercise
area in the middle of nowhere,” drawing a smattering of laughter.http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/prince-charles-recalls-his-military-service-at-cfb-gagetown-as-royal-tour-begins/article2439038/?utm_medium=Feeds%3A%20RSS%2FAtom&utm_source=Home&utm_content=2439038
CFB GAGETOWN, N.B.—
The Canadian Press
Published Monday,
May. 21, 2012 10:38AM EDT
Last updated Monday,
May. 21, 2012 10:59AM EDT
Prince Charles and his wife Camilla have kicked off their Canadian tour at
the same New Brunswick military base where the Duke of Cornwall trained as a
military pilot.
Charles said he was delighted to begin his trip at Canadian Forces Base
Gagetown, where he flew as a naval helicopter pilot in the 1970s “at an exercise
area in the middle of nowhere,” drawing a smattering of laughter.http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/prince-charles-recalls-his-military-service-at-cfb-gagetown-as-royal-tour-begins/article2439038/?utm_medium=Feeds%3A%20RSS%2FAtom&utm_source=Home&utm_content=2439038
File the fraud claim with the postal inspector, not the police
INTERNATIONAL PRIORITY AIRMAIL
JAMICA NEW YORK
VANCOUVER BC
MAIN OFFICE
FORGED
EVIDENCE OF THE TITLE
“municipality” includes the
corporation of a city, town, village, county, township, parish or other
territorial or local division of a province, the inhabitants of which are
incorporated or are entitled to hold property collectively for a public purpose;
“document of title to lands”
includes any writing that is or contains evidence of the title, or any part of
the title, to real property or to any interest in real property, and any
notarial or registrar’s copy thereof and any duplicate instrument, memorial,
certificate or document authorized or required by any law in force in any part
of Canada with respect to registration of titles that relates to title to real
property or to any interest in real property;
includes any writing that is or contains evidence of the title, or any part of
the title, to real property or to any interest in real property, and any
notarial or registrar’s copy thereof and any duplicate instrument, memorial,
certificate or document authorized or required by any law in force in any part
of Canada with respect to registration of titles that relates to title to real
property or to any interest in real property;
“It’s our decision, not theirs,” Mr. Coleman said in an interview. “We’re
going to look at the business case on both sides.”
Booming natural-gas sector ignites debate over BC Hydro service
JUSTINE HUNTER
VICTORIA—
From Monday's Globe and Mail
Published Sunday,
May. 20, 2012 7:46PM EDT
Last updated Sunday,
May. 20, 2012 7:49PM EDT
Newcomers to British Columbia’s natural-gas sector may be denied access to BC
Hydro’s electricity services as the province looks to curb costs for Hydro’s
current customers.
While B.C. is aggressively pushing new industrial development, including the
energy-intensive production of liquefied natural gas, a turf war has begun about
who gets to share the finite supply of the province’s relatively cheap
hydro-electric power.
Energy Minister Rich Coleman is seeking to reassure those who are already
doing business in B.C. that they won’t pay the price as new development comes on
line.
“They’re not losing their power, they are not losing their price, so they
shouldn’t worry,” he said in an interview.
But a debate about how to serve the province’s burgeoning shale-gas
development, carried out mostly within the confines of a regulatory hearing on a
transmission line proposal, demonstrates that BC Hydro’s customers are
worried.
BC Hydro’s application to its regulator to build the Dawson Creek/Chetwynd
area transmission project has opened a can of worms. The hearing centres on
plans for a $225-million service upgrade for the town of Dawson Creek and the
surrounding industry, including five gas production facilities.
Mr. Coleman said the province is weighing the cost of providing new Hydro
services against leaving those gas producers to generate their own electricity
by burning fuel.
“It’s our decision, not theirs,” Mr. Coleman said in an interview. “We’re
going to look at the business case on both sides.”
The producers, including Shell and Encana, argue they are entitled to the
same service as any other industry in B.C. But other major industrial players
are challenging the notion that BC Hydro should treat all customers the
same.
And that wrangling has already delayed the upgrade project past the point
where the community’s hydro-electric services are expected to exceed
capacity.
“It’s difficult in the midst of growing, trying to promote a boom, to be told
that lack of power might slow things down,” Dawson Creek Mayor Mike Bernier said
in an interview.
On the town’s west side, a $70-million liquid-nitrogen plant is under
construction at a new industrial park. In the past three years, the community of
13,000 has landed $150-million in private investment. But potential new
investors are now wary about whether they will have electricity to run their
plants.
Hydro’s major industrial and commercial customers, worried that all these new
demands will lead to higher power prices, asked why natural gas producers who
are asking to be served by the new system couldn’t use their own product to
supply their energy needs. The hearing was also asked to consider whether new
customers should pay higher rates, and if is time to change the 50-year-old
“postage stamp” policy that sees Hydro charge the same rate for electricity
regardless of where you are in B.C.
The Commercial Energy Consumers Association argued that natural-gas producers
should be encouraged to provide their own energy rather than drive up costs for
all BC Hydro’s customers.
“We are concerned with the logic of a mass of strategic investment in natural
gas in the province, resulting in export of very significant quantities of
natural gas to be used for power supply in other countries,” said the
association’s lawyer, Chris Weafer, “while the BC Hydro ratepayers may end up
with very significant rate increases to facilitate that.”
Matthew Keen of the Association of Major Power Customers raised the
allocation of costs between old and new customers on the system, prompting BC
Hydro to suspend the hearing for four months. By the time the hearing resumed,
the ranks of interveners had swelled, with 16 lawyers representing local first
nations, gas producers, the Old Age Pensioners’ Organization, the Sierra Club of
B.C. and others.
Don Davies, representing Murphy Oil, Encana and Arc Resources, said his
clients are entitled to the same service as any other customer of BC Hydro. “And
my clients have made and are making decisions and investments based on that
expectation.”
The provincial government’s lawyer, Jennifer Champion, said the bigger
question of industrial power rates will be the subject of a public review some
time in the future. “Given the significant load growth that we’re seeing or
forecasting in the North, government is planning a broader review of industrial
electricity policy.”
JUSTINE HUNTER
VICTORIA—
From Monday's Globe and Mail
Published Sunday,
May. 20, 2012 7:46PM EDT
Last updated Sunday,
May. 20, 2012 7:49PM EDT
Newcomers to British Columbia’s natural-gas sector may be denied access to BC
Hydro’s electricity services as the province looks to curb costs for Hydro’s
current customers.
While B.C. is aggressively pushing new industrial development, including the
energy-intensive production of liquefied natural gas, a turf war has begun about
who gets to share the finite supply of the province’s relatively cheap
hydro-electric power.
Energy Minister Rich Coleman is seeking to reassure those who are already
doing business in B.C. that they won’t pay the price as new development comes on
line.
“They’re not losing their power, they are not losing their price, so they
shouldn’t worry,” he said in an interview.
But a debate about how to serve the province’s burgeoning shale-gas
development, carried out mostly within the confines of a regulatory hearing on a
transmission line proposal, demonstrates that BC Hydro’s customers are
worried.
BC Hydro’s application to its regulator to build the Dawson Creek/Chetwynd
area transmission project has opened a can of worms. The hearing centres on
plans for a $225-million service upgrade for the town of Dawson Creek and the
surrounding industry, including five gas production facilities.
Mr. Coleman said the province is weighing the cost of providing new Hydro
services against leaving those gas producers to generate their own electricity
by burning fuel.
“It’s our decision, not theirs,” Mr. Coleman said in an interview. “We’re
going to look at the business case on both sides.”
The producers, including Shell and Encana, argue they are entitled to the
same service as any other industry in B.C. But other major industrial players
are challenging the notion that BC Hydro should treat all customers the
same.
And that wrangling has already delayed the upgrade project past the point
where the community’s hydro-electric services are expected to exceed
capacity.
“It’s difficult in the midst of growing, trying to promote a boom, to be told
that lack of power might slow things down,” Dawson Creek Mayor Mike Bernier said
in an interview.
On the town’s west side, a $70-million liquid-nitrogen plant is under
construction at a new industrial park. In the past three years, the community of
13,000 has landed $150-million in private investment. But potential new
investors are now wary about whether they will have electricity to run their
plants.
Hydro’s major industrial and commercial customers, worried that all these new
demands will lead to higher power prices, asked why natural gas producers who
are asking to be served by the new system couldn’t use their own product to
supply their energy needs. The hearing was also asked to consider whether new
customers should pay higher rates, and if is time to change the 50-year-old
“postage stamp” policy that sees Hydro charge the same rate for electricity
regardless of where you are in B.C.
The Commercial Energy Consumers Association argued that natural-gas producers
should be encouraged to provide their own energy rather than drive up costs for
all BC Hydro’s customers.
“We are concerned with the logic of a mass of strategic investment in natural
gas in the province, resulting in export of very significant quantities of
natural gas to be used for power supply in other countries,” said the
association’s lawyer, Chris Weafer, “while the BC Hydro ratepayers may end up
with very significant rate increases to facilitate that.”
Matthew Keen of the Association of Major Power Customers raised the
allocation of costs between old and new customers on the system, prompting BC
Hydro to suspend the hearing for four months. By the time the hearing resumed,
the ranks of interveners had swelled, with 16 lawyers representing local first
nations, gas producers, the Old Age Pensioners’ Organization, the Sierra Club of
B.C. and others.
Don Davies, representing Murphy Oil, Encana and Arc Resources, said his
clients are entitled to the same service as any other customer of BC Hydro. “And
my clients have made and are making decisions and investments based on that
expectation.”
The provincial government’s lawyer, Jennifer Champion, said the bigger
question of industrial power rates will be the subject of a public review some
time in the future. “Given the significant load growth that we’re seeing or
forecasting in the North, government is planning a broader review of industrial
electricity policy.”
