False Claims Act Update & Alert payers Against Fraud Education Fund | Washington, D.C. | WWW.TAF.ORG May 20, 2009 !
TaxPresid
A "business trust" falls under the definition of a "corporation," see 11 U.S.C. S 101(9)(A)(v). A corporation, in turn is a "person" eligible to be a debtor. See 11 U.S.C. SS 101(41), 109. On the other hand, a trust set up for estate or family planning purposes and not for investment purposes does not fall within the definition of a "corporation" and so would not be eligible to be a debtor in a bankruptcy case. http://www.nortoninstitutes.org/08Seminar Materials/08Ch11ForumReview/M08-Ch11Review23.html
'Reign of terror' ends with sentence: police
Last Updated: Friday, November 19, 2010 | 5:29 PM PT Comments11Recommend3CBC NewsRaminder Bhandher will be spending several years in prison for a 2008 murder, a B.C. Supreme Court judge announced Friday.(Mike Laanela/CBC)
What police call "a reign of terror" has ended with the sentencing Friday of a man convicted of murder in a 2008 Surrey shooting.
Raminder Bhandher was sentenced to life in prison with no parole eligibility for 10 years in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver.
Bhandher, 32, was convicted of second-degree murder in July for the shooting death of Tejvir Singh Bains in his home in January 2008.
"Today's sentencing ends a reign of terror that Mr. Bhandher conducted in the community for years," said Cpl. Dale Carr, of the Integrated Homicide Investigation Team. "By his own admissions in court, Bhander was involved in the criminal lifestyle for years and was a profoundly immature, selfish man."
Bhander was arrested weeks after killing Bains, 24, and has since remained in custody.
"Bhandher was known to use violence to settle a lot of his disputes, no matter how trivial," said Carr. "In this instance, the jury saw fit to say enough is enough."
Bhandher as long been known to police.
He testified for the defence during the Air India bombing trial in Vancouver in 2004. He said accused Air India bombing conspirator Ripudaman Singh Malik was "like a father" to him.
Under cross-examination by the Crown prosecutor at that trial, Bhandher admitted he made a career out of credit card fraud, drug trafficking and had previously lied under oath.
Assignment Fraud involves modifications to the original loan where the name of the bank who actually owns the note is changed on execution of the Loan Modification Agreement. The problem with these “modifications” (actually new loans with new “lenders”) is that the old loans remain unaffected.
The existing cloud on title to the property, the mortgage deed (or deed of trust), the note, the obligation, the purported assignments etc. is being compounded by attempts to allow impostors to foreclose on the mortgage, collect on the note, modify the loan, or approve a short sale.
The time bomb is title where securitized loans were recorded, foreclosed, modified or sold. The parties (other than the borrower and possibly the Trustee on the Deed of Trust) had actual knowledge that the “lender” was not the Lender, the terms of the obligation were already changed at the time of closing, the appraisal was false, the underwriting was negligent or fraudulent, the Good Faith Estimate was by definition rendered neither in good faith nor even close to an accurate estimate, and the list goes on and on.
The addition of Canada Trust's more than 400 branches helped the newly renamed TD Canada Trust become Canada's largest retail banking network at that time.TD Bank Financial Group The website for TD Bank Financial Group. Features the latest news and information about personal, commercial and wholesale financial products and services, investor relations, current economic trends, and community relations.http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0001244
*DECLARATION AND ORDER *Mortgage in favor of the Bank of Montreal under EG56733
legal Mafia’s ‘dark illness’ infects Canada
The bank launched a $120-million suit against hundreds of Albertans, alleging they were complicit in fraudulent sales involving more than 200 properties across the province.
The bank claims it lost $30 million as a result of the elaborate fraud. It names several city lawyers, mortgage brokers and BMO employees in the court action.
The law firm representing BMO published legal notices in the Calgary Herald on Thursday, naming 34 respondents it has not been able to serve in person.
The claims against the unaccounted-for respondents total nearly $40 million.
Calgary police and the RCMP have launched a criminal investigation into the case.
The probe is in its early stages and no charges have been laid.
bank claims it lost $30 million as a result of the elaborate fraud.
municaplity and rcmp and every Canadian should be told MR CARTEN's story - EXSPOSING TRUTH BASED ON HARD EVIDENCE
The history of Mr. Carten's entanglement with Themis began in 1997 when he was unable to pay child support because he was misled by the BC Government promises to settle the Sun Belt claim, and promised financing from private sources did not materialize,
Themis pounced on and destroyedMr. Carten'sbusiness and destroyed his ability to pay child support with full knowledge of the long term harm their actions would cause his children and ex-wife. In 1998, Mr. Carten explained to Themis that he was going to need some time to re-establish his law practice after the aborted venture with Sun Belt Water Inc.Mr. Carten had had a solid history of paying child support since his marriage breakdown in 1991 so there should have been no question about his willingness to pay.
Themis would not agree to any compromise and, although it had clear legislative authority to work with debtors, Themis chose instead to destroy Mr. Carten because he was regarded as an enemy of the state.When released from jail, the attacks by Themis continued without ceasing and Mr. Carten fled to Alberta where he took part time work at minimum wage on construction sites, loading trucks and at other odd jobs. On his days off, Mr. Carten continued to do his work for Sun Belt Water Inc. and tried to negotiate some terms of agreement with Themis so he could return to BC and go into business and support his family. However, Themis would not relent and encouraged the Alberta child support enforcement program to chase Mr. Carten for $2,000 per month when he was only making $300 or $400 per week.
At this time, Themis started slandering and libeling Mr. Carten by telling the Alberta program Mr. Carten had a history of violence - which was completely untrue. The lawyer for Themis, a woman named Nola Silzer, came to court and proceeded to mislead the judge with many untruths about Mr. Carten. She misleadingly stated he was a deadbeat dad who never paid child support. During the period from 2000 to 2006, Mr. Carten was warned, time and time again, that his life was in danger and that he should be extremely cautious.
On one occasion, he was threatened with death while entering the courthouse in Vancouver. This was obviously a set up and the sheriff's office was clearly a party because, when he entered the courthouse, a sheriff came up and asked Mr. Carten if he had a problem outside. Never before in his 22 year career as a lawyerhad a sheriff come up and made such an inquiry.http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/the-soviet-state-of-british-columbia.html
medical and vital statistics tampered with orginals files and documents
LEGAL AID SOCIETY AGENTS OF INFLUENCE STATEMENT OF CLAIM based on fraud
•"Canadian judgment" means a judgment, decree or order made in a civil proceeding by a court of a province or territory of Canada, •(a) that requires a person to pay money, including an order for the payment of money that •(i) is made in the exercise of a judicial function by a tribunal of a province and •(ii) is enforceable as a judgment of the superior court of unlimited trial jurisdiction in that province or territory; •(b) under which a person is required to do or not do an act or thing; or •(c) that declares rights, obligations or status in relation to a person or thing;
2002 CIBC REASON BEHIND CLAIM - ALBERTA 3RD PARTY LIABILTY FRAUD
If a mortgage broker is forging documents for you, then he is doing it for everyone else, and will eventually get caught . All his past mortgage files will be audited and there is a good chance that someone will knock on your door months or years after you�ve closed your mortgage deal to confront you about submitting fake paperwork. They have the right to call the mortgage and report you to law enforcement. Fraud is a very serious crime.
MORTGAGE FRAUD Bank of Montreal
NASTY ATTACHMENT This ALBERTA "VERSION OF THE Bank of Montreal" 1ST MORTGAGE was not signed by BRIAN WILEY of BC
THIS ALBERTA VERSION IS A BAD FORGERY IE :CUT AND PASTE. This exhibit was found in 2009 in the Alberta Queen's Bench court in EDMONTON(on microfilm ) in 2010 under a personal property lien search under the name BRIAN WILEY * MICROFILM was used up until late 1980's early 1990's
MY belief : 2002 DIVORCE BASED ON FRAUD
BC SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BURNYEAT
PERJURY 14 YEARS ?????
–Manipulation and fraud •57 A person must not, directly or indirectly, engage in or participate in conduct relating to securities or exchange contracts if the person knows, or reasonably should know, that the conduct •(a) results in or contributes to a misleading appearance of trading activity in, or an artificial price for, a security or exchange contract, or •(b) perpetrates a fraud on any person. •Mr. Wiley Estate alleges that a genuine issue of material fact exists with respect to the meaning of the security agreements granted, due to gross violations of the Securities Act •"A material alteration of an instrument made after its execution by a party offering it into evidence, which alteration was not consented to by the other party, nullifies the instrument as a legal obligation. An alteration is material if it: •"`* * * destroys the identity of the instrument or of the contract evidenced thereby, or which so changes its terms as to give it a different legal effect from that which it originally had, and thus works some change in the rights, obligations, interest, or relations of the parties. * * *' 4 Am.Jur.2d Alteration of Instruments § 5, pp. 6-7 (1962)." Starrett v. Shepard, Wyo.,