To wit:
Biffle v. Morton Rubber Indus., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 143, 144
(Tex.1990).“An instrument is deemed in law filed at the time it is delivered to
the clerk, regardless ofwhether the instrument is file marked.”The minute all documents are received, it is recorded. Refusal to
record documents once deposited to the county recorder is considered criminal subject
to Title 18 USC § 2071 and it is
punishableby fines and imprisonment without regard to third party intervention
and where consent to third party intervention is refused by the party recording the
document.
To:County ClerkC/O County of ________________ From:
Ms.Dolan-Flynn Wiley
e:NOTICE
- FILING OF
CRIMINAL CHARGESOn
the date of ___________________________,
you engaged in the criminal activity of taking filed documents and have willfully attempted to conceal these by removing these documents withoutthe consent and approval of the owner,________________________________, and failing to return these by submitting to someone
other the owner and this by your own admission.
Receipt of this transaction is provided by notarized copy to you.In addition to the filing of criminal charges, your bond insurance information and bond number is required for your indemnity is engaging in actions outside of your
oath of office in a criminalcapacity. You are to respond with this information immediately and to return all documentation recorded by you as proven by receipt of this transaction. Failure to do so will result in further charges under the Tweel and Carmine doctrines for fraud and estoppel to prevent from engagement in future commerce. You are to provide a valid oath of office in determination of this by no later than ten (10) days from the date of receipt of this letter and by 5:00 PM close of business on that day.
To wit:
Biffle v. Morton Rubber Indus., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 143, 144
(Tex.1990).“An instrument is deemed in law filed at the time it is delivered to
the clerk, regardless ofwhether the instrument is filemarked.”The minute all documents are received, it is recorded. Refusal to
record documents once depositedto the county recorder is considered criminal subject
to Title 18 USC § 2071 and it is
punishableby fines and imprisonment without regard to third party intervention
and where consent to thirdparty intervention is refused by the party recording the
document.Title 18 USC – Crimes and Criminal ProcedurePart I – CrimesChapter 101 – Records and ReportsSection 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation
generally(a)Whoever willfully
and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys,or attempts to do
so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record,
proceeding,map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with
any clerk or officer of anycourt of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer ofthe United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than three years, orboth.(b)Whoever, having the
custody of any such record, proceeding, map,
book, document, paper,or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
obliterates, falsifies, ordestroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than three years, orboth; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding
any office under the UnitedStates. As used in this subsection, the term ''office'' does not
include the office held by anyperson as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United
States.Revised Statutes of The United States, 1st session, 43 Congress
1873-1874.Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICESEC. 5403. (Destroying, &c., public records.)Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with
intent to steal or destroy,takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of
justice, filed or depositedwith any clerk or officer of such court, or
any paper, or document, or record filed or depositedin any public office, or with any judicial or public officer, shall,
without reference to thevalue of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so taken, pay a
fine of not more than two
thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at hard labor, not more than
three years, or both: [See§ § 5408, 5411, 5412.1]SEC. 5407. (Conspiracy to
defeat enforcement of the
laws.)If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering,obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in
any State or Territory,with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws,
or to injure him or hisproperty for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right
of any person, or class ofpersons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of such persons
shall be punished by a fine ofnot less than five hundred nor more than five thousand dollars, or by
imprisonment, with orwithout hard labor, not less than six months nor more than six years,
or by both such fine andimprisonment. See § § 1977-1991, 20042010, 5506-5510.1SEC. 5408. (Destroying record by officer in charge.)Every
officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding
specified insection fifty-four hundred and three, who fraudulently takes away, or withdraws, or destroys anysuch record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his office or
deposited with him or in hiscustody, shall pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or
suffer imprisonment at hardlabor not more than three years, or both-, and shall, moreover,
forfeit his office and be foreverafterward disqualified from holding any office under the Government of
the United State
s.
The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract (U.S. Const. Art. 6,
Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs.Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2
nd
. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.) in which clerks,
officials,or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold
the United States and StateConstitutions) in return for substance (wages,
perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to thepenalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, conspiracy under Titled
28 U.S.C., Sections 241,242., treason under
the Constitution at Article
3, Section 3., and intrinsic fraud as perAuerbach
Vs. Samuels., 10 Utah 2
nd
. 152., 349 P. 2
nd
. 1112, 1114., Alleghany Corp Vs. Kirby.,D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. Vs. State.,
437 S.W. 20, 28.ViolationCode SectionRecommended PenaltyBreach of Oath ContractT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial of proper WarrantT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00(no supporting affidavit, no Miranda Warning / no damaged complaining
party & etc.)Denial of
Claim of Special AppearanceT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial of
Reasonable Defense ArgumentsT18
§ 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial of Access to All EvidenceT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial to
Right to Truth in EvidenceT18 §
3571(each violation) $250,000.00Attempted SlaveryT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00(Forced
Compliance to [adhesion] Contracts not held) Example Requiring a citizen to
participatein the Federal Reserve Banking System/Conversion of the Constitutional
Right to Travel to a StatePrivilege i.e., no driver’s license, no auto tag, no compulsory
insurance, no inspection sticker,failure to fasten a seat belt, failure to stop for inspection, search
without a proper warrant,etc.Converting
a Constitutional Right
to a T18 §
3571(each violation) $250,000.00State granted Privilege with aboveDenial of
Provision in the ConstitutionT18 § 3571(each violation)
$250,000.00(US and/or State. Example: Demanding
worthless unbacked printed
paper (must be coined) FRN’spayment of
state debts. Clerk
proceeding with a foreclosure where the
filing fee was not paid
inlawful money of substance gold or silver coinage in violation of Ar.1,
§ 10, C1, 1 (a federalinjunction)Treason (combined above acts)T18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Falsifying jurisdiction (trying a common law matter under colorable maritime) trying a statematter
under false color of jurisdiction in the U.S. Dist. Court outside the 10 square
mileprovision at Art. 1, § 8, CL. 17Attempted GenocideT18 § 1091(each violation) $1,050,000.00(destroying a
family, their way to earn a living while taking their home under color of law
andpretended law)Misprision of FelonyT18 § 4(each violation) $500.00Conspiracy (2 or more people)T18 § 241(each violation) $10,000.00Attempted ExtortionT18 § 872(each violation) $5,000.00(Claiming a debt
not owed under the U.S. or State Constitutions) Example: collecting a form
oftaxes, i.e., Property/Automobile Taxes not authorized by the U.S.
Constitution(Holding a Certified Money Order and pretending it does
not exist, a felony as per U.S.
Vs.Tweel., 550 F. 2d. 297, 299, 300.
Mail Fraud and Mail ThreatsT18 § 876(each violation) $5,000.00Authority United StatesViolationCode Section Recommended PenaltyFraudT18 § 1001(each violation) $5,000.00Falsification of DocumentsT18 § 1001(each violation) $5,000.00PerjuryT18 § 1621(each violation) $5,000.00Subordinating of PerjuryT18 § 1621(each violation) $5,000.00Grand
Theft (see
no. of counts 18 USC 2112)T18
§ 3571(each violation)
$5,000.00Racketeering (civil)T18 § 1694(each violation) $25,000.00Racketeering (criminal)T18 § 1963(each violation) $250,000.00
Concealment, removal, mutilation T18
§ 2071 (look it upfor $ amount)
Failure to produce said documents guarantees the process of due law
and your removal fromoffice in addition to statutory penalty, punishment
and possible incarceration. This
evidence hasalso
been forwarded to the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division,
along with acopy of the stolen document, as the taxation for the fine in the
amount of $______________ constitutes perusal by the provost marshal(s) as such.
The fines incumbent to the documents filed are
in the amount of $__________________. Havingengaged
in the commerce to infringe upon this lawful declaration, forms 1099OID will be
filedwith the Internal Revenue Service to have this fine enforced and to
have the Internal RevenueService require you to pay this by tax. You are duly notified.Sincerely,Dated: Your
name/signature
Ms.Dolan-Flynn Wiley
e:NOTICE
- FILING OF
CRIMINAL CHARGESOn
the date of ___________________________,
you engaged in the criminal activity of taking filed documents and have willfully attempted to conceal these by removing these documents withoutthe consent and approval of the owner,________________________________, and failing to return these by submitting to someone
other the owner and this by your own admission.
Receipt of this transaction is provided by notarized copy to you.In addition to the filing of criminal charges, your bond insurance information and bond number is required for your indemnity is engaging in actions outside of your
oath of office in a criminalcapacity. You are to respond with this information immediately and to return all documentation recorded by you as proven by receipt of this transaction. Failure to do so will result in further charges under the Tweel and Carmine doctrines for fraud and estoppel to prevent from engagement in future commerce. You are to provide a valid oath of office in determination of this by no later than ten (10) days from the date of receipt of this letter and by 5:00 PM close of business on that day.
To wit:
Biffle v. Morton Rubber Indus., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 143, 144
(Tex.1990).“An instrument is deemed in law filed at the time it is delivered to
the clerk, regardless ofwhether the instrument is filemarked.”The minute all documents are received, it is recorded. Refusal to
record documents once depositedto the county recorder is considered criminal subject
to Title 18 USC § 2071 and it is
punishableby fines and imprisonment without regard to third party intervention
and where consent to thirdparty intervention is refused by the party recording the
document.Title 18 USC – Crimes and Criminal ProcedurePart I – CrimesChapter 101 – Records and ReportsSection 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation
generally(a)Whoever willfully
and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys,or attempts to do
so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record,
proceeding,map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with
any clerk or officer of anycourt of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer ofthe United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than three years, orboth.(b)Whoever, having the
custody of any such record, proceeding, map,
book, document, paper,or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
obliterates, falsifies, ordestroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than three years, orboth; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding
any office under the UnitedStates. As used in this subsection, the term ''office'' does not
include the office held by anyperson as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United
States.Revised Statutes of The United States, 1st session, 43 Congress
1873-1874.Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICESEC. 5403. (Destroying, &c., public records.)Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with
intent to steal or destroy,takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of
justice, filed or depositedwith any clerk or officer of such court, or
any paper, or document, or record filed or depositedin any public office, or with any judicial or public officer, shall,
without reference to thevalue of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so taken, pay a
fine of not more than two
thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at hard labor, not more than
three years, or both: [See§ § 5408, 5411, 5412.1]SEC. 5407. (Conspiracy to
defeat enforcement of the
laws.)If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering,obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in
any State or Territory,with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws,
or to injure him or hisproperty for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right
of any person, or class ofpersons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of such persons
shall be punished by a fine ofnot less than five hundred nor more than five thousand dollars, or by
imprisonment, with orwithout hard labor, not less than six months nor more than six years,
or by both such fine andimprisonment. See § § 1977-1991, 20042010, 5506-5510.1SEC. 5408. (Destroying record by officer in charge.)Every
officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding
specified insection fifty-four hundred and three, who fraudulently takes away, or withdraws, or destroys anysuch record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his office or
deposited with him or in hiscustody, shall pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or
suffer imprisonment at hardlabor not more than three years, or both-, and shall, moreover,
forfeit his office and be foreverafterward disqualified from holding any office under the Government of
the United State
s.
The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract (U.S. Const. Art. 6,
Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs.Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2
nd
. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.) in which clerks,
officials,or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold
the United States and StateConstitutions) in return for substance (wages,
perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to thepenalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, conspiracy under Titled
28 U.S.C., Sections 241,242., treason under
the Constitution at Article
3, Section 3., and intrinsic fraud as perAuerbach
Vs. Samuels., 10 Utah 2
nd
. 152., 349 P. 2
nd
. 1112, 1114., Alleghany Corp Vs. Kirby.,D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. Vs. State.,
437 S.W. 20, 28.ViolationCode SectionRecommended PenaltyBreach of Oath ContractT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial of proper WarrantT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00(no supporting affidavit, no Miranda Warning / no damaged complaining
party & etc.)Denial of
Claim of Special AppearanceT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial of
Reasonable Defense ArgumentsT18
§ 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial of Access to All EvidenceT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Denial to
Right to Truth in EvidenceT18 §
3571(each violation) $250,000.00Attempted SlaveryT18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00(Forced
Compliance to [adhesion] Contracts not held) Example Requiring a citizen to
participatein the Federal Reserve Banking System/Conversion of the Constitutional
Right to Travel to a StatePrivilege i.e., no driver’s license, no auto tag, no compulsory
insurance, no inspection sticker,failure to fasten a seat belt, failure to stop for inspection, search
without a proper warrant,etc.Converting
a Constitutional Right
to a T18 §
3571(each violation) $250,000.00State granted Privilege with aboveDenial of
Provision in the ConstitutionT18 § 3571(each violation)
$250,000.00(US and/or State. Example: Demanding
worthless unbacked printed
paper (must be coined) FRN’spayment of
state debts. Clerk
proceeding with a foreclosure where the
filing fee was not paid
inlawful money of substance gold or silver coinage in violation of Ar.1,
§ 10, C1, 1 (a federalinjunction)Treason (combined above acts)T18 § 3571(each violation) $250,000.00Falsifying jurisdiction (trying a common law matter under colorable maritime) trying a statematter
under false color of jurisdiction in the U.S. Dist. Court outside the 10 square
mileprovision at Art. 1, § 8, CL. 17Attempted GenocideT18 § 1091(each violation) $1,050,000.00(destroying a
family, their way to earn a living while taking their home under color of law
andpretended law)Misprision of FelonyT18 § 4(each violation) $500.00Conspiracy (2 or more people)T18 § 241(each violation) $10,000.00Attempted ExtortionT18 § 872(each violation) $5,000.00(Claiming a debt
not owed under the U.S. or State Constitutions) Example: collecting a form
oftaxes, i.e., Property/Automobile Taxes not authorized by the U.S.
Constitution(Holding a Certified Money Order and pretending it does
not exist, a felony as per U.S.
Vs.Tweel., 550 F. 2d. 297, 299, 300.
Mail Fraud and Mail ThreatsT18 § 876(each violation) $5,000.00Authority United StatesViolationCode Section Recommended PenaltyFraudT18 § 1001(each violation) $5,000.00Falsification of DocumentsT18 § 1001(each violation) $5,000.00PerjuryT18 § 1621(each violation) $5,000.00Subordinating of PerjuryT18 § 1621(each violation) $5,000.00Grand
Theft (see
no. of counts 18 USC 2112)T18
§ 3571(each violation)
$5,000.00Racketeering (civil)T18 § 1694(each violation) $25,000.00Racketeering (criminal)T18 § 1963(each violation) $250,000.00
Concealment, removal, mutilation T18
§ 2071 (look it upfor $ amount)
Failure to produce said documents guarantees the process of due law
and your removal fromoffice in addition to statutory penalty, punishment
and possible incarceration. This
evidence hasalso
been forwarded to the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division,
along with acopy of the stolen document, as the taxation for the fine in the
amount of $______________ constitutes perusal by the provost marshal(s) as such.
The fines incumbent to the documents filed are
in the amount of $__________________. Havingengaged
in the commerce to infringe upon this lawful declaration, forms 1099OID will be
filedwith the Internal Revenue Service to have this fine enforced and to
have the Internal RevenueService require you to pay this by tax. You are duly notified.Sincerely,Dated: Your
name/signature
Obama: J.P. Morgan Loss Shows Why Regs Are Needed
By SCOTT PATTERSON AND VICTORIA MCGRANE
President Barack Obama used J.P. Morgan ChaseJPM -3.17%& Co.'s more than $2
billion trading loss to justify tough rules for Wall Street, even as lawmakers
and regulators scrambled to explain whether such trading would actually violate
new rules for banks.
"We don't know all the details. It's going to be investigated, but this is
why we passed Wall Street reform," Mr. Obama said in an interview on ABC's "The
View." Mr. Obama called J.P. Morgan "one of the best managed banks there is"
and Chief Executive James Dimon "one of the smartest bankers we
got."
The president's main message Monday, that even ace bankers and top banks need
new regulations, appeared to be undercut by some Washington regulators, who
said they weren't sure if rules under development would have prevented J.P.
Morgan's trade.
Mr. Obama's praise for Mr. Dimon and J.P. Morgan contrasted with some
previous scorn for Wall Street banks.
The mixed signals captured some of the confusion that reigned in Washington
as government officials rushed to determine whether the trading loss would have
violated a provision of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial overhaul.
Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.), who last week called for a Senate hearing on
J.P. Morgan's trading activities, said in a televised interview that a n
important bank regulator sees the trade in question as allowable under the
so-called Volcker rule, which prohibits banks from making bets with their own
money but allows some forms of hedging against losses.
Mr. Corker said his office spoke to staff of the Comptroller of the Currency,
the regulator most responsible for overseeing the bank's unit that contained
the trading position, several times over the weekend seeking information. The
examiner in charge of J.P. Morgan "very adamantly" insisted the trade would be
considered a permitted hedge under the Volcker rule, Mr. Corker said.
OCC staff also said that hedging against broad market moves is "something
that is a useful thing for financial institutions to be doing," Mr. Corker said
in an interview.
Mr. Corker said he spoke Monday evening with Comptroller Thomas Curry, who
explained that OCC officials "think they might have been a little over their
skis this weekend" on the Volcker rule view.
"I think they wanted to walk back and look at this a little bit more
closely," Mr. Corker said.
In a statement released later in the day, the OCC said that it and other
regulators "are gathering additional details regarding the transactions to
determine the full regulatory implications of these activities and the proposed
rules currently being considered." The OCC said that "previous positions
attributed to OCC staff were based on incomplete details." The confusion in
part stems from the fact that the Volcker rule hasn't been finalized, an OCC
spokesman said.
The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, is also probing the trade at J.P. Morgan and
looking for any signs of similar risk in other parts of the bank, according to
a spokeswoman.
Jon Kyl (R., Ariz.), a member of the Senate GOP leadership, pushed back
against the "knee-jerk" reaction that there is any regulatory fix for what
happened to J.P. Morgan. "You had here some people who made a bad business
decision and lost a bunch of their own money. Well, the free enterprise system
allows that to happen."
—Jared Favole and Siobhan
Hughes contributed to this
article.
