AN OPEN LETTER OF INPUT,
The Criminal Code of Canada, meanwhile, says piracy “in or out of Canada” is an indictable offence subject to a sentence of life imprisonment.
INTERNATIONAL Citizens for Tax Justice.
MARINE BASED MOTHERSHIP:CAMPBELL RIVER BASED
in the public interest
"GOD SAVE OUR QUEEN' AND JAIL THE FAKES
The FAKE Queen's insurable interest-TARGET ESTATE VICTIM AND HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS
CULTURE OF DEFIANCE: SOVEREIGN CITIZENS PONZIE FRAUD OPPURTINITY/ZERO ACCOUNTABILTY
Dozens of US corporations paid no federal taxes
280 corporations received a total of nearly $223 billion in tax subsidies
in the public interest
"GOD SAVE OUR QUEEN' AND JAIL THE FAKES
The FAKE Queen's insurable interest-TARGET ESTATE VICTIM AND HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS
CULTURE OF DEFIANCE: SOVEREIGN CITIZENS PONZIE FRAUD OPPURTINITY/ZERO ACCOUNTABILTY
Dozens of US corporations paid no federal taxes
280 corporations received a total of nearly $223 billion in tax subsidies
The citizens of New France received slaves as gifts from their allies among First Nations peoples. Slaves were prisoners taken in raids against the villages of the Fox nation, a tribe that was an ancient rival of the Miami people and their Algonquian allies.[59] Native (or "pani", a corruption of Pawnee) slaves were much easier to obtain and thus more numerous than African slaves in New France, but were less valued. The average native slave died at 18, and the average African slave died at 25[58] (the average European could expect to live until the age of 35[60]). 1790, the abolition movement was gaining credence in Canada and the ill intent of slavery was evidenced by an incident involving a slave woman being violently abused by her slave owner on her way to being sold in the United States.[58] The Act Against Slavery of 1793 legislated the gradual abolition of slavery: no slaves could be imported; slaves already in the province would remain enslaved until death, no new slaves could be brought into Upper Canada, and children born to female slaves would be slaves but must be freed at age 25.[58] The Act remained in force until 1833 when the British Parliament's Slavery Abolition Act finally abolished slavery in all parts of the British Empire.[61] Historian Marcel Trudel has documented 4,092 recorded slaves throughout Canadian history, of which 2,692 were Aboriginal people, owned by the French, and 1,400 blacks owned by the British, together owned by approximately 1,400 masters.[58] Trudel also noted 31 marriages took place between French colonists and Aboriginal slaves.[58]
Types Unfree labour · Debt bondage
These transactions are typically structured where the insured sets up a trust as the QUEEN/CROWN as the ESTATE beneficiary. Then, after the policy is in place, both the policy and the beneficial interests in the trust are sold to the investor. The investor then continues paying the premiums until the insured dies.
Ok here’s the deal. The insurable interest requirement is only a requirement at the time the insured takes out the policy. That is an absolute fact. After that you can change the ownership and beneficiary to whomever you like. For instance if you change the beneficary to a charity which you most certainly can, their only interest in the policy is when the insured dies. There was a recent case about two weeks ago where Phoenix Life lost the very same type of case. Every policy is contestable for 2 years immediately following the issuance. After that a policy can not be contested by the insurance company as long as it’s in force and did not lapse at anytime and then reinstated. Also on another front, insurance companies such as AIG and Berkshire Hathaway have been in the past huge purchasers of these policies. The insurance contract governs this and it says that you as the owner can change the ownership to whomever you please and makes no mention to insurable interest when this is done. This is all insurance 101.
Ive been in this industry for 12 years and to my knowledge no insured who ever sold their policy has been murdered. In that situation the insurance company would withhold payingthe claim pending the outcome of any investigation and should a beneficiary be responsible for the insureds death they would not collect. They would go to jail.
http://volokh.com/2011/01/03/death-bet-insurance/
WASHINGTON - Dozens of US corporations paid no federal taxes in recent years, and many received government subsidies despite earning healthy profits, a new study showed Thursday.
The report by Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which examined 280 US firms, found 78 of them paid no federal income tax in at least one of the last three years.
It found 30 companies enjoyed a negative income tax rate - which in some cases means getting tax rebates - over the three-year period, despite combined pre-tax profits of $160 billion.
"These 280 corporations received a total of nearly $223 billion in tax subsidies," said the report's lead author, Robert McIntyre, director at Citizens for Tax Justice.
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Many+firms+avoid+taxes/5651060/story.html#ixzz1cekTMI1c
The report by Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which examined 280 US firms, found 78 of them paid no federal income tax in at least one of the last three years.
It found 30 companies enjoyed a negative income tax rate - which in some cases means getting tax rebates - over the three-year period, despite combined pre-tax profits of $160 billion.
"These 280 corporations received a total of nearly $223 billion in tax subsidies," said the report's lead author, Robert McIntyre, director at Citizens for Tax Justice.
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Many+firms+avoid+taxes/5651060/story.html#ixzz1cekTMI1c
Legislation & Rules Print Version The Law Society’s authority to license and regulate lawyers and paralegals in the public interest is granted by the Ontario government through the Law Society Act and regulations made under the act.
Law Society by-laws, Rules of Professional Conduct, Paralegal Rules of Conduct -- all based on the Law Society Act and made by Law Society benchers -- set out the professional and ethical obligations of lawyers and paralegals and the manner in which they are regulated by the Law Society. Lawyers and paralegals who fail to meet these standards are subject to the Law Society complaints and regulatory processes.
- Law Society Act
- Barristers Act
- Solicitors Act
- Class Proceedings O. Reg. 771/92
- County and District Law Associations R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 708
- Complaints Resolution Commissioner O. Reg. 31/99
- Hearings Before the Hearing and Appeal Panels O. Reg. 167/07
- Law Foundation R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 709
- e-Laws-Gov. of Ont.
- Statutes and Regs.-Dept. of Justice
Society Act [RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 433
Registrar has no obligation to ensure accuracy or compliance 94.1 Nothing in this Act requires the registrar to ensure that a record filed with the registrar, or the information contained in it, is accurate or complete or meets the requirements of this Act, the regulations or any other enactment.
Inspection and copies of documents 95 (1) On payment of the fees set out in Schedule C, a person may
(a) inspect the documents filed in the office of the registrar relating to a society,
(b) require a copy or extract of a document or part of it, and
(c) require a copy or extract to be certified as a true copy.
(2) A document purporting to be issued and signed by the registrar or a person designated as a signing officer by the Lieutenant Governor in Council or by the registrar must be received in evidence and, unless the contrary is shown, is deemed to have been so issued, and it is not necessary to prove the handwriting or official position of the registrar or person designated by the Lieutenant Governor in Council or by the registrar.
(3) If a person requests a society to provide a copy of a financial statement of the society referred to in section 64 or 65 and pays the fee charged for that copy under subsection (5) of this section, the society must provide that person with a copy of that financial statement promptly after receipt of the request and payment.
(4) A copy of a financial statement referred to in subsection (3) must be provided in the manner agreed to by the society and the person seeking to obtain the copy or, in the absence of such an agreement,
(a) must, if the person seeking to obtain the copy so requests, be provided by mailing it to that person, or
(b) may, in any other case, be provided to the person seeking to obtain the copy by making it available for pick-up at the address of the society.
(5) A society may, for any financial statement made available by it under subsection (3), charge a reasonable fee that is not greater than the prescribed amount.
Filing annual report 68 A society must, within 30 days after each annual general meeting, file with the registrar an annual report in the form established by the registrar.
Copies of constitution and bylaws 69 A society must provide to a member, on request, free of charge or, if so resolved by the directors, on payment of not more than $1, a copy of its constitution and bylaws.
Register of members 70 (1) A society must keep a register of its members.
(2) A society must enter in the register the names of the applicants for incorporation and the name of every other person admitted as a member of the society, together with the following particulars of each member:
(a) the full name and resident address;
(b) the date on which the person is admitted as a member;
(c) the date on which the person ceases to be a member;
(d) the class of membership, if provision is made for classes.
(3) A society that fails to comply with this section commits an offence.
Copies of constitution and bylaws 69 A society must provide to a member, on request, free of charge or, if so resolved by the directors, on payment of not more than $1, a copy of its constitution and bylaws.
Register of members 70 (1) A society must keep a register of its members.
(2) A society must enter in the register the names of the applicants for incorporation and the name of every other person admitted as a member of the society, together with the following particulars of each member:
(a) the full name and resident address;
(b) the date on which the person is admitted as a member;
(c) the date on which the person ceases to be a member;
(d) the class of membership, if provision is made for classes.
(3) A society that fails to comply with this section commits an offence.
Linda Dixon 's posse are wanted by the FBI
Human trafficking From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For the miniseries, see Human Trafficking (TV miniseries). Part of a series on Slavery Contemporary slavery
Types Unfree labour · Debt bondage
By June 2010, the Trafficking Protocol had been ratified by 117 countries and 137 parties.[3]
Human trafficking ·
e-Human trafficking is the illegal E-trade of human beings for the purposes of reproductive slavery, commercial sexual exploitation, forced labor, or a modern-day form of slavery.
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons,
especially Women and Children (also referred to as the Trafficking Protocol) was adopted by the United Nations in Palermo, Italy in 2000, and is an international legal agreement attached to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. The Trafficking Protocol is one of three Protocols adopted to supplement the Convention.[1]
The Protocol is the first global, legally binding instrument on trafficking in over half a century and the only one that sets out an agreed definition of trafficking in persons.
The purpose of the Protocol is to facilitate convergence in national cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking in persons with full respect for their human rights.
The Trafficking Protocol defines human trafficking as:
(a) [...] the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.
Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs;
(b) The consent of a victim of trafficking in persons to the intended exploitation set forth in subparagraph (a) of this article shall be irrelevant where any of the means set forth in subparagraph (a) have been used;
(c) The recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of a child for the purpose of exploitation shall be considered “trafficking in persons” even if this does not involve any of the means set forth in subparagraph (a) of this article;
(d) “Child” shall mean any person under eighteen years of age.[2] The Trafficking Protocol entered into force on 25 December 2003. By June 2010, the Trafficking Protocol had been ratified by 117 countries and 137 parties.[3]
ROYAL SOVEREIGN CITIZENS GLOBAL FRAUD
CRIMINAL GOLD MINING,OIL,INSURANCE INDUSTRY
REAL ESTATE INVESTORS ENTERPRISE
FIGHT ROYAL LAWYER CRIMES
BAY & WALLS STREET LEGAL LICE IN COLLUSION WITH UK QUEENS ESTATE
ROYAL LEHAMAN BROTHERS
ROYAL SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR A MONARCH IMPERIAL BIG CORP GROUP INVESTING
GOLD MINES
GOLF COURSES
FISHING LODGES
CONDO OWNERSHIP/GROUP INVESTORS MORTGAGES
GROUP INVESTORS
Fire River Gold Corp. Receives 2nd Concentrate Payment
On behalf of the Board of Directors, "Richard Goodwin"
Richard Goodwin
President and COO
advance payment of $1,020,375 from Glencore International
October 28, 2011 Vancouver, BC, Canada - Fire River Gold Corp. and Mystery Creek Resources Inc. (TSX.V: FAU), (OTCQX: FVGCF), (FSE: FWR) (collectively "the Company") is pleased to announce that it has received an advance payment of $1,020,375 from Glencore International PLC for the second shipment of gold-rich copper concentrate from the Nixon Fork Mine.
This payment is a provisional advance for the 24 bags comprising 21.2 dmt (dry metric tonnes) of gold-rich copper concentrate. The bags are palletized and flown from the Nixon Fork Mine aboard a Hercules L382G airplane. Shipping lots of 24 bags are assembled in Anchorage at Lynden Air Cargo's facility and barged in secure 40 ft. containers to Seattle for ocean transport to the PASAR smelter in Isabel, Philippines.
CRIMINAL GOLD MINING,OIL,INSURANCE INDUSTRY
REAL ESTATE INVESTORS ENTERPRISE
FIGHT ROYAL LAWYER CRIMES
BAY & WALLS STREET LEGAL LICE IN COLLUSION WITH UK QUEENS ESTATE
ROYAL LEHAMAN BROTHERS
ROYAL SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR A MONARCH IMPERIAL BIG CORP GROUP INVESTING
GOLD MINES
GOLF COURSES
FISHING LODGES
CONDO OWNERSHIP/GROUP INVESTORS MORTGAGES
GROUP INVESTORS
Fire River Gold Corp. Receives 2nd Concentrate Payment
On behalf of the Board of Directors, "Richard Goodwin"
Richard Goodwin
President and COO
advance payment of $1,020,375 from Glencore International
October 28, 2011 Vancouver, BC, Canada - Fire River Gold Corp. and Mystery Creek Resources Inc. (TSX.V: FAU), (OTCQX: FVGCF), (FSE: FWR) (collectively "the Company") is pleased to announce that it has received an advance payment of $1,020,375 from Glencore International PLC for the second shipment of gold-rich copper concentrate from the Nixon Fork Mine.
This payment is a provisional advance for the 24 bags comprising 21.2 dmt (dry metric tonnes) of gold-rich copper concentrate. The bags are palletized and flown from the Nixon Fork Mine aboard a Hercules L382G airplane. Shipping lots of 24 bags are assembled in Anchorage at Lynden Air Cargo's facility and barged in secure 40 ft. containers to Seattle for ocean transport to the PASAR smelter in Isabel, Philippines.
Descendants of ROYAL LAW debt slaves
THE UK QUEEN MUST FIND THIS CRIMINAL WHO IS ABUSING HER AUTHORITY!
BECAUSE OF THIS 2 DECADE LONG HMS/QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA PONZIE ,WHICH IS STILL A FEDERAL CRIME IN PROGRESS,
THOUSANDS OF VICTIMS HAVE LOST THEIR LOVED ONES , THEIR JOBS ,HEALTH ,PENSIONS ,ESTATES,PRIVATE WEALTH/ASSETS,OPPURTUNITIES
LINDA DIXON IS A FRAUD AND SO IS HER CANADIAN PASSPORT.
LINDA DIXON IS A SOCIOPATH MUNICAPLITY CITY HALL HO HO.
LINDA DIXON IS NOT WHO SHE SAYS SHE IS.
WHO IS THE REAL LINDA DIXON?
IS SHE A CANADIAN WELFRARE FRAUD QUEEN WHO HAS MADE ALOT OF MONEY USING THE QUEEN OF THE UK'S AUTHORITY.
LINDA DIXON NEEDS TO BE CAUGHT AND THROWN IN JAIL,ALONG WITH HER POSSE WHO HAVE GIVEN HER AN OPEN BACK DOOR TO DESTROY FAMILIES ALL OVER US,CANADA AND UK
IS LINDA IDIXON A PROFESSIONAL LIAR/CON/AND IDANGEROUS TO ALL THOSE WHO CROSS HER PATH?
LINDA DIXON HAS A HUNT AND KILL FOR PROFIT AGENDA AND WALL STREET'S BIG BANKS HAVE AID AND ABETTED HER CRIMES FOR OVER 2 DECADES
LINDA DIXON'S GIVES THE JUDICIAL PEDOPHILES THEIR FIX IN RETURN THEY GIVE HER THEIR AUTHORITY TO CREATE BOGUS LIENS /COURT ORDERS TO FURTHER HER PONZIE ADDICTION.
LINDA DIXON IS A MENANCE TO SOCIETY ,THE COURTS, AND IS DESTROYNG THE RULE OF LAW ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER.
LINDA DIXON LIVES ABOVE THE LAW WITH THE HELP OF ALBERTA'S QUEENS BENCH "OFFICERS OF THE COURT " WHO HAVE CREATED A CASHFLOW CASHCOW SLUSHFUND FOR A SECRET NETWORK OF ROYAL MONARCH NEW AGER INVESTORS.
BECAUSE OF THIS 2 DECADE LONG HMS/QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA PONZIE ,WHICH IS STILL A FEDERAL CRIME IN PROGRESS,
THOUSANDS OF VICTIMS HAVE LOST THEIR LOVED ONES , THEIR JOBS ,HEALTH ,PENSIONS ,ESTATES,PRIVATE WEALTH/ASSETS,OPPURTUNITIES
LINDA DIXON IS A FRAUD AND SO IS HER CANADIAN PASSPORT.
LINDA DIXON IS A SOCIOPATH MUNICAPLITY CITY HALL HO HO.
LINDA DIXON IS NOT WHO SHE SAYS SHE IS.
WHO IS THE REAL LINDA DIXON?
IS SHE A CANADIAN WELFRARE FRAUD QUEEN WHO HAS MADE ALOT OF MONEY USING THE QUEEN OF THE UK'S AUTHORITY.
LINDA DIXON NEEDS TO BE CAUGHT AND THROWN IN JAIL,ALONG WITH HER POSSE WHO HAVE GIVEN HER AN OPEN BACK DOOR TO DESTROY FAMILIES ALL OVER US,CANADA AND UK
IS LINDA IDIXON A PROFESSIONAL LIAR/CON/AND IDANGEROUS TO ALL THOSE WHO CROSS HER PATH?
LINDA DIXON HAS A HUNT AND KILL FOR PROFIT AGENDA AND WALL STREET'S BIG BANKS HAVE AID AND ABETTED HER CRIMES FOR OVER 2 DECADES
LINDA DIXON'S GIVES THE JUDICIAL PEDOPHILES THEIR FIX IN RETURN THEY GIVE HER THEIR AUTHORITY TO CREATE BOGUS LIENS /COURT ORDERS TO FURTHER HER PONZIE ADDICTION.
LINDA DIXON IS A MENANCE TO SOCIETY ,THE COURTS, AND IS DESTROYNG THE RULE OF LAW ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER.
LINDA DIXON LIVES ABOVE THE LAW WITH THE HELP OF ALBERTA'S QUEENS BENCH "OFFICERS OF THE COURT " WHO HAVE CREATED A CASHFLOW CASHCOW SLUSHFUND FOR A SECRET NETWORK OF ROYAL MONARCH NEW AGER INVESTORS.
Female's body parts found at Manitoba First Nation RCMP investigating homicide RCMP are investigating what appears to be a gruesome case on Manitoba's Sandy Bay Ojibway First Nation after parts of a female's body were found in two locations.
The Mounties said they were called Saturday morning to assist the Dakota Ojibway Police Service in their investigation of the death of a female.
A large area has been sealed off at Sandy Bay First Nation, on the west side of Lake Winnipeg.
Police have not released the name or age of the victim, nor have they released a cause of death, but the RCMP's major crimes unit and forensic identification services are handling the investigation.http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2011/07/30/mb-female-body-parts-found345.html
The Mounties said they were called Saturday morning to assist the Dakota Ojibway Police Service in their investigation of the death of a female.
A large area has been sealed off at Sandy Bay First Nation, on the west side of Lake Winnipeg.
Police have not released the name or age of the victim, nor have they released a cause of death, but the RCMP's major crimes unit and forensic identification services are handling the investigation.http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2011/07/30/mb-female-body-parts-found345.html
UK CROWN ESTATE TAX FREE TRUST
ROYAL SOVEREIGN CITIZENS CLIENTS
ROYAL LAW -USED BY RIGHT WING RELGIOUS SOCIETIES
BASED ON THE OATH OF BROTHERHOOD
FREEMASON ,CATHOLIC OPUS DEI/JESUITS,FELLOWSHIP-SCIENTOLOGY,NEW AGERS,FREEMASON ENVIROMENTALISTS
CONSUMERS: SLAVERY ERA INSURANCE REGISTRY In August 2000 the California legislature found that
"[I]nsurance policies from the slavery era have been discovered in the archives of several insurance companies, documenting insurance coverage for slaveholders for damage to or death of their slaves, issued by a predecessor insurance firm. These documents provide the first evidence of ill-gotten profits from slavery, which profits in part capitalized insurers whose successors remain in existence today." SB2199 Sec. 1(a).
- SB 2199: Slavery Era Insurance Policies: Statute
CHAPTER 5. SLAVERY ERA INSURANCE POLICIES
13810. The commissioner shall request and obtain information from insurers licensed and doing business in this state regarding any records of slaveholder insurance policies issued by any predecessor corporation during the slavery era.
13811. The commissioner shall obtain the names of any slaveholders or slaves described in those insurance records, and shall make the information available to the public and the Legislature.
13812. Each insurer licensed and doing business in this state shall research and report to the commissioner with respect to any records within the insurer's possession or knowledge relating to insurance policies issued to slaveholders that provided coverage for damage to or death of their slaves.
13813. Descendants of slaves, whose ancestors were defined as private property, dehumanized, divided from their families, forced to perform labor without appropriate compensation or benefits, and whose ancestors' owners were compensated for damages by insurers, are entitled to full disclosure.
When a society of judicial officers of the LEGAL SOCIETY ignore securities laws and break every criminal law in the book including allowing UK ESTATE & CROWN banks (ATB financial ) to reap returns on the deaths of victims insured by way of REAL ESTATE fraud by the MAPLE GROUPS BIG WALL STREET BANKS NETWORK IN COLLUSION WITH BAY STREET is violating International criminal court laws.
This is CORRUPTION at the highest levels.
the Doral Golf Resort is a $967.2 million commercial CMBS loan that includes four other KSL Hotel properties. The portion of the mortgage that applies specifically to the Doral property is $98.5 million.
A DANGEROUS postion to put not just CANADIANS finanacial security/health/families in, but the safety of all citizens on a global level.
This take over is the beginnings of the end for any future land ownership,pensions,assets as these MAPLE MASONS/ SKULL AND BONES GROUP MEMBERS have somewhat mastered the PONZIE cashflow. This has been done through laundering mortgage and estate frauds through the ALBERTA QUEENS BENCH "administration of ESTATE act " which allowed these Maple GROUP players to PIMP the Queens name and authority for their own INVESTORS WEALTH/ PEDOHILIA GREED AS WELL AS STEALING TAXPAYERS MONIES .
THE HAMMER HAS FALLEN ON WALL STREET WHICH means Bank criminals need to create another route to hardwire their illegal investments ,income,start up capital in a way that won't be dectected by the VICTIM Taxpayers OR oathtaking goverment civil servants.
Until the Queen deals with the corruption in Canada as EXPOSED IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN THROUGH THIS WEBSITE including others such as
www.WATERWARSCRIME.com
www.SEALEGAGCY.com
www.eddie achtem.blog
and of course............the state of Kentucky----HMS victims CANADA will remain under crown cartel ILLEGAL QUEENS Judicial tyranny.
The rule of order for the MAPLE MASON/OPUS DEI GROUP is wealth takeover using the ROYAL military ,which of course the wording "ROYAL", means belonging to UK CROWN ESTATE.
Until the Queen sorts out this land ESTATE tax loophole which is stealing from Canadians/AMERICANs, who for the most part are not a part of the NOBALE MONARCH ELITE SOCIETY
To allow the TAKE-OVER by the MAPLE GROUP is nothing more than aiding and abetting criminal federal forgeries frauds and murder cover-ups in order to make the MAXIMUM return for shareholders/investors and illegally created corporations.
let me make myself clear once again
We have international paper terrorism federal/transnational PONZIE corruption RING happening at this very moment.
Every one of the MAPLE GROUPS MEMBERS AND BIG WALLS STREET BANKS have a direct traceable fraud claims which can be found through out this website.
This website is proof of what is instore if you, the securities commisions ,approve this takeover.
All those in an official capacity to restore law and order who fail to prosecute wire fraud/idenity fraud,PONZIE FRAUD will eventually find yourselves in the same postition as the QUEEN.
Until RULE OF LAW & ORDER is restored and court record,land ownership record is restored to it's legal chain of title/ownership across the US/CANADA, this is setting taxpayers up for another financial meltdown and more and more families ESTATE wealth will be stolen by this GROUP of likeminded PONZIE MASTERMINDS.
tHE MAPLE GROUP IS A SECRET SOCIETY OF FREEMASON/Catholic OPUS DEI/FELLOWSHIP/new agers think tank.
THE STYLE OF THE MAPLE GROUP CAPITAL RAISING IS OVER 70 YEARS OLD
The maple group marketing approach is dangerous.
This is nothing more than a powerhouse to procure fraud which with a monopoly can be covered up by the BROTHERHOOD.
IF the Maple Groups succeeds with this hostile bid you can mark my words and watch BC turn into PARIDISE IN HELL.
The Maple group with it's history for unethical venture capital raising proves my point. see www.sealegacy.com
venture capital financing by way of ALBERTA Queens Bench IMPERIAL CORRUPTION ,PERJURY AND FORGERY INCLUDING MORTGAGE FRAUD UNDER A FORGED SPECIAL ACT OF PARLIMENT
The MAPLE group can not be trusted to work within realms of lawful venture capital raising.
There is thousands of lawsuits heading towards the Queen of the UK .
Thanks to most of the MAPLE GROUP big banks ,including Bank of Canada thousands investors were robbed by directing minds of the MAPLE groups CEO's.
Using the QUEEN'S AUTHORITY TO COMMIT FRAUD IS CRIME AND AN INSULT TO THE UK QUEEN and her family!
NOBODY like's having their identity,good name,assets,income future or present ,PENSIONS ,ESTATES OR LIFE INSURANCE SETTLEMENTS OR LAND,fathers,family and friends used AND STOLEN by PONZIE BANK criminals to create ILLEGAL CASHFLOWS for their illegal companies.
BC WEST COAST PLEASURE CRAFT
ROYAL ACCIDENTAL CARBON MONOXIDE DEATH
NEEDED FOR ROYAL HMS /BRIXON/FIRE RIVER GOLD
CASHFLOW INCOME DESPERATELY NEEDED TO REPLACE STOLEN PENSION FUNDS LOSTS THROUGH SHADEY/US FBI WANTED CONVICTED CONS IN COLLUSION WITH ROYAL WELFARE QUEEN RECRUITERS
WHAT WERE LOCAL GOVERMENT CITY COUNCIL ON IN 1997?
,HY WOULD LOCAL GOVERMENT ELECTED OFFICIALS ALLOW HOME GROWN WELFARE QUEENS THE FREEDOM TO COMMIT SUCH VILE VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE
CRONY LOCAL,PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL GOVERMENT DEALS PROCURED THROUGH LOCAL,PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL CRONY NETWORK OF US MERS QUEENS
WHO ARE CANADIAN WELFARE- MAXIMUS CLIENTS
ABUSIVE 3RD PARTY AGENT/3RD PARTY DEBIT COLLECTOR
DFO 'S NOT FOR profit “crimes of moral turpitude”
"SPIN &COVER UP ORCHESTRATED BY WELFARE QUEENS OF CANADA ,DFO CROWN MINISTERS , MP,PREMIERS,CRA &JUSTICE DEPARTMENT/FINANCE,PUBLIC SAFETY B.C. Good Samaritan dies BECAUSE OF CR CITY HALL CITY HALL'S FORGERY IN COLLUSION WITH THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF DFO BC AND ROYAL US MAXIMUS CONTRACTOR
B.C. Good Samaritan WHISTLEBLOWER
dies of A SLOPPY TARGETED ROYAL DEATH
ROYAL DFO /ROYAL NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION AND NUMERIOUS ROYAL SOCIETY'S PLOTTED ROYAL MONARCH POLITICAL TAKEDOWN
ROYAL BC CORONOR'S DEATH CERTIFICATE UNPLAUSIBLE REBUTTED
WIRE FRAUD
VENTURE DOUBLE FUNDING FRAUD
CAPITAL CASH FLOW PONZIE DEATH CONTRACTS
Includes “assister, abettor, conspirator, or colluder”
OCTOBER 7, 2011, 12:20 P.M. ET
OSC Invites Public Comment For Review Of Maple/TMX Bid press release
Alberta and B.C. Securities Regulators Seek Comment on Maple Group Acquisition Corporation's Offer to Acquire the TMX Group CALGARY, ALBERTA, Specifically, the Commissions would like comment on the impact of Maple Group's offer on the TSX Venture, the venture capital markets, and other stakeholders involved in venture capital financing.
stakeholders involved in forged venture capital financing.
$967.2 million commercial loan
INTERNATIONAL E- ROYAL SOVEREIGN CITIZENS REGULATOR/PROSECUTORS NEEDED GLOBALLY!!!!!
MARINE BASED FEDERAL/ PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS
project manage a strong record for justice, administrative efficiency.
U.S. Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 >§ 1028. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information
(a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section—
(1) knowingly and without lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document;
(2) knowingly transfers an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without lawful authority;
(3) knowingly possesses with intent to use unlawfully or transfer unlawfully five or more identification documents (other than those issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication features, or false identification documents;
(4) knowingly possesses an identification document (other than one issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication feature, or a false identification document, with the intent such document or feature be used to defraud the United States;
(5) knowingly produces, transfers, or possesses a document-making implement or authentication feature with the intent such document-making implement or authentication feature will be used in the production of a false identification document or another document-making implement or authentication feature which will be so used;
(6) knowingly possesses an identification document or authentication feature that is or appears to be an identification document or authentication feature of the United States or a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance which is stolen or produced without lawful authority knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without such authority;
(7) knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law, or that constitutes a felony under any applicable State or local law; or
(8) knowingly traffics in false or actual authentication features for use in false identification documents, document-making implements, or means of identification; shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is— (1) except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 15 years, or both, if the offense is—
(A) the production or transfer of an identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document that is or appears to be— (i) an identification document or authentication feature issued by or under the authority of the United States; or (ii) a birth certificate, or a driver’s license or personal identification card;
(B) the production or transfer of more than five identification documents, authentication features, or false identification documents;
(C) an offense under paragraph (5) of such subsection; or
(D) an offense under paragraph (7) of such subsection that involves the transfer, possession, or use of 1 or more means of identification if, as a result of the offense, any individual committing the offense obtains anything of value aggregating $1,000 or more during any 1-year period;
(2) except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, if the offense is—
(A) any other production, transfer, or use of a means of identification, an identification document,,
[1] authentication feature, or a false identification document; or (B) an offense under paragraph (3) or (7) of such subsection; (3) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both, if the offense is committed—
(A) to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 929 (a)(2));
(B) in connection with a crime of violence (as defined in section 924 (c)(3)); or
(C) after a prior conviction under this section becomes final; (4) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 30 years, or both, if the offense is committed to facilitate an act of domestic terrorism (as defined under section 2331 (5) of this title)
or an act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331 (1) of this title);
(5) in the case of any offense under subsection (a), forfeiture to the United States of any personal property used or intended to be used to commit the offense; and
(6) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case. (c) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) of this section is that--
(1) the identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document is or appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States or a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance or the document-making implement is designed or suited for making such an identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document;
(2) the offense is an offense under subsection (a)(4) of this section; or (3) either--
(A) the production, transfer, possession, or use prohibited by this section is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce, including the transfer of a document by electronic means; or
(B) the means of identification, identification document, false identification document, or document-making implement is transported in the mail in the course of the production, transfer, possession, or use prohibited by this section. (d) In this section and section 1028A--
(1) the term “authentication feature” means any hologram, watermark, certification, symbol, code, image, sequence of numbers or letters, or other feature that either individually or in combination with another feature is used by the issuing authority on an identification document, document-making implement, or means of identification to determine if the document is counterfeit, altered, or otherwise falsified;
(2) the term “document-making implement” means any implement, impression, template, computer file, computer disc, electronic device, or computer hardware or software, that is specifically configured or primarily used for making an identification document, a false identification document, or another document-making implement;
(3) the term “identification document” means a document made or issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, political subdivision of a foreign government, an international governmental or an international quasi-governmental organization which, when completed with information concerning a particular individual, is of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals;
(4) the term “false identification document” means a document of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that— (A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and (B) appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated by the President as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization;
(5) the term “false authentication feature” means an authentication feature that— (A) is genuine in origin, but, without the authorization of the issuing authority, has been tampered with or altered for purposes of deceit; (B) is genuine, but has been distributed, or is intended for distribution, without the authorization of the issuing authority and not in connection with a lawfully made identification document, document-making implement, or means of identification to which such authentication feature is intended to be affixed or embedded by the respective issuing authority; or (C) appears to be genuine, but is not;
(6) the term “issuing authority”— (A) means any governmental entity or agency that is authorized to issue identification documents, means of identification, or authentication features; and (B) includes the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated by the President as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international government or quasi-governmental organization;
(7) the term “means of identification” means any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific individual, including any— (A) name, social security number, date of birth, official State or government issued driver’s license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number; (B) unique biometric data, such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation; (C) unique electronic identification number, address, or routing code; or (D) telecommunication identifying information or access device (as defined in section 1029 (e));
(8) the term “personal identification card” means an identification document issued by a State or local government solely for the purpose of identification;
(9) the term “produce” includes alter, authenticate, or assemble;
(10) the term “transfer” includes selecting an identification document, false identification document, or document-making implement and placing or directing the placement of such identification document, false identification document, or document-making implement on an online location where it is available to others;
(11) the term “State” includes any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other commonwealth, possession, or territory of the United States; and
(12) the term “traffic” means— (A) to transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of, to another, as consideration for anything of value; or (B) to make or obtain control of with intent to so transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of. (e) This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States, or any activity authorized under chapter 224 of this title. (f) Attempt and Conspiracy.— Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy. (g) Forfeiture Procedures.— The forfeiture of property under this section, including any seizure and disposition of the property and any related judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be governed by the provisions of section 413 (other than subsection (d) of that section) of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853). (h) Forfeiture; Disposition.— In the circumstance in which any person is convicted of a violation of subsection (a), the court shall order, in addition to the penalty prescribed, the forfeiture and destruction or other disposition of all illicit authentication features, identification documents, document-making implements, or means of identification. (i) Rule of Construction.— For purpose of subsection (a)(7), a single identification document or false identification document that contains 1 or more means of identification shall be construed to be 1 means of identification.
MARINE BASED FEDERAL/ PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS
project manage a strong record for justice, administrative efficiency.
U.S. Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 >§ 1028. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information
(a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section—
(1) knowingly and without lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document;
(2) knowingly transfers an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without lawful authority;
(3) knowingly possesses with intent to use unlawfully or transfer unlawfully five or more identification documents (other than those issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication features, or false identification documents;
(4) knowingly possesses an identification document (other than one issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication feature, or a false identification document, with the intent such document or feature be used to defraud the United States;
(5) knowingly produces, transfers, or possesses a document-making implement or authentication feature with the intent such document-making implement or authentication feature will be used in the production of a false identification document or another document-making implement or authentication feature which will be so used;
(6) knowingly possesses an identification document or authentication feature that is or appears to be an identification document or authentication feature of the United States or a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance which is stolen or produced without lawful authority knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without such authority;
(7) knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law, or that constitutes a felony under any applicable State or local law; or
(8) knowingly traffics in false or actual authentication features for use in false identification documents, document-making implements, or means of identification; shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is— (1) except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 15 years, or both, if the offense is—
(A) the production or transfer of an identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document that is or appears to be— (i) an identification document or authentication feature issued by or under the authority of the United States; or (ii) a birth certificate, or a driver’s license or personal identification card;
(B) the production or transfer of more than five identification documents, authentication features, or false identification documents;
(C) an offense under paragraph (5) of such subsection; or
(D) an offense under paragraph (7) of such subsection that involves the transfer, possession, or use of 1 or more means of identification if, as a result of the offense, any individual committing the offense obtains anything of value aggregating $1,000 or more during any 1-year period;
(2) except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, if the offense is—
(A) any other production, transfer, or use of a means of identification, an identification document,,
[1] authentication feature, or a false identification document; or (B) an offense under paragraph (3) or (7) of such subsection; (3) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both, if the offense is committed—
(A) to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 929 (a)(2));
(B) in connection with a crime of violence (as defined in section 924 (c)(3)); or
(C) after a prior conviction under this section becomes final; (4) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 30 years, or both, if the offense is committed to facilitate an act of domestic terrorism (as defined under section 2331 (5) of this title)
or an act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331 (1) of this title);
(5) in the case of any offense under subsection (a), forfeiture to the United States of any personal property used or intended to be used to commit the offense; and
(6) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case. (c) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) of this section is that--
(1) the identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document is or appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States or a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance or the document-making implement is designed or suited for making such an identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document;
(2) the offense is an offense under subsection (a)(4) of this section; or (3) either--
(A) the production, transfer, possession, or use prohibited by this section is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce, including the transfer of a document by electronic means; or
(B) the means of identification, identification document, false identification document, or document-making implement is transported in the mail in the course of the production, transfer, possession, or use prohibited by this section. (d) In this section and section 1028A--
(1) the term “authentication feature” means any hologram, watermark, certification, symbol, code, image, sequence of numbers or letters, or other feature that either individually or in combination with another feature is used by the issuing authority on an identification document, document-making implement, or means of identification to determine if the document is counterfeit, altered, or otherwise falsified;
(2) the term “document-making implement” means any implement, impression, template, computer file, computer disc, electronic device, or computer hardware or software, that is specifically configured or primarily used for making an identification document, a false identification document, or another document-making implement;
(3) the term “identification document” means a document made or issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, political subdivision of a foreign government, an international governmental or an international quasi-governmental organization which, when completed with information concerning a particular individual, is of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals;
(4) the term “false identification document” means a document of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that— (A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and (B) appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated by the President as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization;
(5) the term “false authentication feature” means an authentication feature that— (A) is genuine in origin, but, without the authorization of the issuing authority, has been tampered with or altered for purposes of deceit; (B) is genuine, but has been distributed, or is intended for distribution, without the authorization of the issuing authority and not in connection with a lawfully made identification document, document-making implement, or means of identification to which such authentication feature is intended to be affixed or embedded by the respective issuing authority; or (C) appears to be genuine, but is not;
(6) the term “issuing authority”— (A) means any governmental entity or agency that is authorized to issue identification documents, means of identification, or authentication features; and (B) includes the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated by the President as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international government or quasi-governmental organization;
(7) the term “means of identification” means any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific individual, including any— (A) name, social security number, date of birth, official State or government issued driver’s license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number; (B) unique biometric data, such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation; (C) unique electronic identification number, address, or routing code; or (D) telecommunication identifying information or access device (as defined in section 1029 (e));
(8) the term “personal identification card” means an identification document issued by a State or local government solely for the purpose of identification;
(9) the term “produce” includes alter, authenticate, or assemble;
(10) the term “transfer” includes selecting an identification document, false identification document, or document-making implement and placing or directing the placement of such identification document, false identification document, or document-making implement on an online location where it is available to others;
(11) the term “State” includes any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other commonwealth, possession, or territory of the United States; and
(12) the term “traffic” means— (A) to transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of, to another, as consideration for anything of value; or (B) to make or obtain control of with intent to so transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of. (e) This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States, or any activity authorized under chapter 224 of this title. (f) Attempt and Conspiracy.— Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy. (g) Forfeiture Procedures.— The forfeiture of property under this section, including any seizure and disposition of the property and any related judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be governed by the provisions of section 413 (other than subsection (d) of that section) of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853). (h) Forfeiture; Disposition.— In the circumstance in which any person is convicted of a violation of subsection (a), the court shall order, in addition to the penalty prescribed, the forfeiture and destruction or other disposition of all illicit authentication features, identification documents, document-making implements, or means of identification. (i) Rule of Construction.— For purpose of subsection (a)(7), a single identification document or false identification document that contains 1 or more means of identification shall be construed to be 1 means of identification.
THE SOLUTION TO FUTURE GLOBAL FINANCIAL SECURITY/CYBER INDENITY FRAUD CRIMINALS denied-entry-to-usa
aliens involved in serious criminal activity who have asserted immunity from prosecution
GET THE SLICE
UK QUEENS GOT CANADIAN/AMERICAN/UK CROWN LEGAL LICE
NOBODY LIKES TO FIND DEAD FAMILY IN THEIR OWN COMMUNITY set up used and insured by criminals using the UK QUEENS authority to further criminal ponzie Industry canada enterprises
IE -FORGED SIGNATURE OF THE MINISTER OF INDUSTRY CANADA
CONDO REAL ESTATE GROUP INVESTING /Norwegian OIL AND GAS/ ALASKA GOLD INVESTING.
HMS/BRIXON INVESTOR GROUP MASTERMINDS IN COLLUSION WITH HMS BC WESTCOAST DFO QUEENS IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA
The MAPLE GROUPS BIG BANKS SILENCE WHISTLEBLOWERS LIKE MY DAD WHO WAS TAKEN OUT IN THE LINE OF DUTY OF TRYING TO PROTECT HIS COMMUNITY AND FAMILY.
SHAME ON ALL POLITICAL PARTIES INVOLVED WHO CAN PARTY IN THIER WEST COAST FISHING LODGES OR STOLEN ELITE CONDO'S GOLFCOURSE CLUBHOUSES WITH ALL ILLEGAL DRUGS PROVIDED FOR BY FBI WANTED CONS ON /TAXPAYERS MONEY WHILE PROCURRING MORE DEAD PEASANT LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS AKA DEATH CONTRACTS OWED TO MAPLE UK QUEENS CROWN ESTATE-----TAX FREE
QUEENS DEATH CONTRACT is the golden ticketed for PONZIE CRIMINALS
This is a new form of TERRORISM PAPER WAR CRIMES\the impact of Maple Group's ROYAL IMPERIAL HMS PONZIE
The MAPLE GROUP 'S NETWORKING allows FBI wanted criminals in it's MAPLE INVESTOR club.
QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF BC
QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF ALBERTA
QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF ONTARIO
QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF QUEBEC
PONZIE
This article will focus on the criminal grounds of criminal inadmissibility for non immigrants to the US and the remedies available for your clients. Non immigrants are persons entering the US on a temporary basis for work, business or pleasure.
Basically, criminal inadmissibility involves “crimes of moral turpitude” (CMT). CMT is a legal term of art and is dealt with under INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I).
Crimes of moral turpitude relate to conduct that is inherently base, vile, or depraved, contrary to social standards of morality and done with a reckless, malicious, or evil intent. This somewhat archaic definition generally relates to the following crimes:
- Controlled Substance Traffickers – Includes “assister, abettor, conspirator, or colluder” INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II),
- Conviction of 2 or more offenses with a combined sentence of 5 or more years INA §212(a)(2)(B
- Prostitution and Commercialized vice §212(a)(2)(D
- Certain aliens involved in serious criminal activity who have asserted immunity from prosecution INA §212(a)(2)(E)
- ,http://www.visaplace.com/usa-immigration/denied-entry-to-usa.php
Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud; Wire Fraud JOSEPH WAYNE McCOOL
McCool was represented to investors as a banking expert who successfully managed a large private trust in Europe before operating Brixon.
CAUTIONJoseph Wayne McCool is being sought for his alleged involvement in a ponzi scheme that was based out of Mesa, Arizona. Sometime before February, 2004, McCool allegedly conspired with two other individuals, who have since been arrested, to operate The Brixon Group, Ltd., which fraudulently solicited millions of dollars from the public. McCool solicited and induced members of the public to invest approximately $10 million in Brixon by making fraudulent and misleading representations concerning how the money would be used, the rates of return, the security of the investments, and their own qualifications to conduct such investments.
McCool was represented to investors as a banking expert who successfully managed a large private trust in Europe before operating Brixon.
CAUTIONJoseph Wayne McCool is being sought for his alleged involvement in a ponzi scheme that was based out of Mesa, Arizona. Sometime before February, 2004, McCool allegedly conspired with two other individuals, who have since been arrested, to operate The Brixon Group, Ltd., which fraudulently solicited millions of dollars from the public. McCool solicited and induced members of the public to invest approximately $10 million in Brixon by making fraudulent and misleading representations concerning how the money would be used, the rates of return, the security of the investments, and their own qualifications to conduct such investments.
IT'S MY BELIEVE JOYCE KENDALL, MAY EVEN BE LINDA DIXON,OR DFO ROBOSIGNER
THE AUTHOR, IS STEALING FROM THE KENTUCKY VICTIMS
BY CLAIMING COSTS FOR THE PONZIE CRIMINAL JUDICIAL INVESTORS .
THE PONZIE MASTERMINDS AKA LAWYERS ARE GETTING PAID TO CONTINUE STEALING THE LIFE SAVINGS FROM THE VICTIMS.
The QUEENS BENCH DIRECTING MIND KAREN HORNER, IS ALLOWING HER CORRUPTED BENCH TO BLEED THE VICTIMS DRY WHILE HER PONZIE INVESTORS CRONIES SPEND THE MONEY ON THEMSELVES.
Is this really JUDGE HORNERS SIGNATURE?
You be the judge ?
I say it's Joyce Kendall!
Kentucky investors need to call the Deputy Registrar GENERAL of Canada from 1997, Joyce Kendall and Judge Horner before an AMERICAN COURT and proof that they are who they say and that they are really the authors of thier documents.
SMOKING GUN !!!!
KAREN HORNER ORDERED THAT LAWYERS GET PAID FOR THEIR PONZIE CRIMES OUT OF THE KENTUCKY VICTIMS POCKETS,
THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FILED ON BEHALF OF AMERICAN VICTIMS OF THE HMS/KENGSINGTON were DECIEVED BY THE QUEENS BENCH OF ALBERTA
BSIG IS JUST ANOTHER NAME FOR BRIXON GROUP/HMS
Why is the UK HEAD OF STATE AKA Queen Elizabeth the 2nd protecting this CAMPBELL RIVER BC welfare criminal who has taken over courts IN CANADA UK AND USA
THIS CANADIAN MAXIMUS BC WELFARE QUEEN is using every judicial officer's name needed to further the HMS ROYAL GOLD PONZIE.
Is our QUEEN really that corrupt or has she been played a STRAWBUYER of the frauds by her CROWN ESTATE.
I personally think she's been set up and is just another STRAWBUYER victim of this HMS PONZIE.
FBI NEEDS TO up grade staus to
international paper terrorism
On May 11, 2006, a federal arrest warrant was issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California after McCool was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud. Additionally, McCool may be in the Philippines.
If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.
Field Office: San Diego
international paper terrorism
On May 11, 2006, a federal arrest warrant was issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California after McCool was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud. Additionally, McCool may be in the Philippines.
If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.
Field Office: San Diego
Multimedia: Images
Aliases:Joe McCool,
Place of Birth: Myrtle Point, Oregon
DESCRIPTION Date(s) of Birth Used: October 3, 1947
Height: 6'2" Weight: 230 pounds
NCIC: W253072313 Occupation: Unknown
Hair: Gray Eyes: Blue Sex: Male Race: White Nationality: American
Scars and Marks: McCool has a scar on his right knee and right wrist.
Remarks: None
Reportedly, McCool promised investors that their money would be invested in European investment programs and used as reserves for high-yield insurance company portfolio investments. Investors were told that Brixon would generate returns of 10 percent per month. Investors were also falsely promised that they could not lose their principal investment because the principal was insured by the State Bar of California. Furthermore, McCool was represented to investors as a banking expert who successfully managed a large private trust in Europe before operating Brixon.
Additionally, McCool reportedly failed to disclose to investors that he did not invest money for the benefit of the investors; instead, he allegedly converted a substantial portion of the invested money for personal use and used new funds received by Brixon to make payments to earlier investors.
Additionally, investors' money was never insured against loss. When Brixon failed to make promised payments to investors, McCool responded by telling investors that the money was tied up in Europe due to the United States Patriot Act and various international banking problems.
Aliases:Joe McCool,
Place of Birth: Myrtle Point, Oregon
DESCRIPTION Date(s) of Birth Used: October 3, 1947
Height: 6'2" Weight: 230 pounds
NCIC: W253072313 Occupation: Unknown
Hair: Gray Eyes: Blue Sex: Male Race: White Nationality: American
Scars and Marks: McCool has a scar on his right knee and right wrist.
Remarks: None
Reportedly, McCool promised investors that their money would be invested in European investment programs and used as reserves for high-yield insurance company portfolio investments. Investors were told that Brixon would generate returns of 10 percent per month. Investors were also falsely promised that they could not lose their principal investment because the principal was insured by the State Bar of California. Furthermore, McCool was represented to investors as a banking expert who successfully managed a large private trust in Europe before operating Brixon.
Additionally, McCool reportedly failed to disclose to investors that he did not invest money for the benefit of the investors; instead, he allegedly converted a substantial portion of the invested money for personal use and used new funds received by Brixon to make payments to earlier investors.
Additionally, investors' money was never insured against loss. When Brixon failed to make promised payments to investors, McCool responded by telling investors that the money was tied up in Europe due to the United States Patriot Act and various international banking problems.
TAX FREE JUDICIAL JUNK BOND /PONZIE CROWN INC…… a transatlantic FLORIDA DEADMANS JOINT COMPANY ESTATE junk bond scam has been running a SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT , TRANSATLANTIC PONZIE ENTERPRISE"
A freezing order /CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPT needs to be implemented.
Spectra Fund." The Fund is authorized to offer an unlimited number of shares.
A freezing order /CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPT needs to be implemented.
Spectra Fund." The Fund is authorized to offer an unlimited number of shares.
CONSERATIVE PARTY OF CANADA PONZIE CORPORATION LTD
Did the Queen of the UK ,QUEEN ELIZABETH 2,authorize this horrific WALL STREET/BAY STREET LEGAL ABUSE against unknowing taxpayers/investors across Canada ,UK, and USA.?
DECADES OLD
CONSERATIVE/LIBERAL WEST COAST FISHING CLUB CASH FLOW DFO/CAMPBELL RIVER HARBOUR COMMISION HMS IMPERIAL PONZIE CASH FLOW
Majority of Canadians underestimate financial burden of divorce: BMO
MAJORITY OF CANADIANS ESTIMATED THE FINACIAL BURDEN QUITE FINE .
IN FACT THAT IS WHY THEY HIRED A LAWYER TO PROTECT THEM and DRAFT & FILE THE AGREEMENTS.
BUT BECAUSE BANK LAWYERS SAW A BETTER DEAL FOR THEIR CLIENT AND BONUS FROM THE BANK THE CHOSE TO MAKE A DEAL WITH THE DEVIL AND NOW THEY MUST PAY THE VICTIMS BACK .
A LEGAL BANK DEAL IS A DEAL
AND NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW
NOT EVEN A JUDGE OR A WANNA BE UK QUEENS COURT CLERK
CONSERATIVE/LIBERAL WEST COAST FISHING CLUB CASH FLOW DFO/CAMPBELL RIVER HARBOUR COMMISION HMS IMPERIAL PONZIE CASH FLOW
Majority of Canadians underestimate financial burden of divorce: BMO
MAJORITY OF CANADIANS ESTIMATED THE FINACIAL BURDEN QUITE FINE .
IN FACT THAT IS WHY THEY HIRED A LAWYER TO PROTECT THEM and DRAFT & FILE THE AGREEMENTS.
BUT BECAUSE BANK LAWYERS SAW A BETTER DEAL FOR THEIR CLIENT AND BONUS FROM THE BANK THE CHOSE TO MAKE A DEAL WITH THE DEVIL AND NOW THEY MUST PAY THE VICTIMS BACK .
A LEGAL BANK DEAL IS A DEAL
AND NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW
NOT EVEN A JUDGE OR A WANNA BE UK QUEENS COURT CLERK
In case you are not familiar with the sovereign citizens movement, this brief description is from the FBI:
Today, we look at a third threat—the “sovereign citizen” extremist movement. Sovereign citizens are anti-government extremists who believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or “sovereign” from the United States. As a result, they believe they don’t have to answer to any government authority, including courts, taxing entities, motor vehicle departments, or law enforcement.
This causes all kinds of problems—and crimes. For example, many sovereign citizens don’t pay their taxes. They hold illegal courts that issue warrants for judges and police officers. They clog up the court system with frivolous lawsuits and liens against public officials to harass them. And they use fake money orders, personal checks, and the like at government agencies, banks, and businesses.
That’s just the beginning. Not every action taken in the name of the sovereign citizen ideology is a crime, but the list of illegal actions committed by these groups, cells, and individuals is extensive (and puts them squarely on our radar). In addition to the above, sovereign citizens:
Commit murder and physical assault;
Threaten judges, law enforcement professionals, and government personnel;
Impersonate police officers and diplomats;
Use fake currency, passports, license plates, and driver’s licenses; and
Engineer various white-collar scams, including mortgage fraud and so-called “redemption” schemes.
Chief Bob Paudert calls Jerry and Joe Kane "animals." He's glad they're dead.
The Paudert family wants answers. They want to know if other police agencies considered the Kanes dangerous, why that information wasn't shared with officers around the country.
Con men have long used schemes similar to Kane's to swindle money.
"He would spend his own time staying on the phone, helping people, answering people's mortgage crisis questions, for four hours, until he literally dropped from exhaustion," said George Tran of Oregon, who distributed Kane's teachings via the Internet.
Donna L. Wray lives on Madison Avenue, just north of Drew Street.
Calls to Wray's telephone number rolled to voice mail and instructed people who wanted to attend "the May 29 and 30 Jerry Kane seminar in Safety Harbor, Fla.," to leave their name and number.
No one answered the door at the home and a note on the door said: "NO VISITORS. THIS MEANS YOU!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING."
The home, Pinellas court records indicate, is in foreclosure.
Times researcher Carolyn Edds and staff writer Drew Harwell contributed to this report. Rodney Thrash can be reached at [email protected] or (727) 445-4167.
The Paudert family wants answers. They want to know if other police agencies considered the Kanes dangerous, why that information wasn't shared with officers around the country.
Con men have long used schemes similar to Kane's to swindle money.
"He would spend his own time staying on the phone, helping people, answering people's mortgage crisis questions, for four hours, until he literally dropped from exhaustion," said George Tran of Oregon, who distributed Kane's teachings via the Internet.
Donna L. Wray lives on Madison Avenue, just north of Drew Street.
Calls to Wray's telephone number rolled to voice mail and instructed people who wanted to attend "the May 29 and 30 Jerry Kane seminar in Safety Harbor, Fla.," to leave their name and number.
No one answered the door at the home and a note on the door said: "NO VISITORS. THIS MEANS YOU!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING."
The home, Pinellas court records indicate, is in foreclosure.
Times researcher Carolyn Edds and staff writer Drew Harwell contributed to this report. Rodney Thrash can be reached at [email protected] or (727) 445-4167.
Ponzi schemes continue to plague us and challenges the law enforcement community.
U.S., the Federal Trade Commission
U.S., the Federal Trade Commission
The QUEEN of THE UNITED KINDOM has been placed in a horrific postion by her own "officers of the CROWN who were literally in bed with WELFARE CRIMINALS .
You be the judge !
It is my opinion she,QUEEN ELIZABETH 2, trusted her appointed /elected CANADIAN Ministers who intentionally with full knowledge set a WEFARE PONZIE PLOT to destroy the personal wealth of taxpayers across the globe .
The Queen has been made aware of this Monarch Royal ponzie AIDED AND ABETTED by WALL STREET BIG BANKS in collusion with AKA MAPLE CROUP .
I'm sure it must sadden her as this is a real threat to the future of the ROYAL FAMILY.
Is this really the QUEEN's crime?
It's a yes and no answer to me.
This PONZIE fraud is a CRIME IN PROGRESS committed against all Canadians and many many Americans.
If the QUEEN refuses to penalize and fire her MINISTERS of her UNITED KINGDOM ,which includes Canada ,than it is her CRIME which means she by law must step down.
HARPERS CONSERATIVES MONARCH rebirth of ROYAL Monarch Madness is a very dangerous SPIN on what Canadians expect from the head of state.
Does this mean by putting ROYAL before our military and navy that UNITED KINGDOM is paying the bills for the federal goverment of Canada?
For anyone or goverment that wants to use ROYAL in the branding/marketing of thier corporation you must have the QUEEN's consent.
Is this really the QUEEN's crime?
Was the Conserative Harper goverment given that CONSENT by the QUEEN ?
If the answer is YES, than Canadian tax dollars are funding UK MILITARY/NAVAL CORRUPT ponzie ENTERPRISE.
SW CALGARY
DEADMAN ESTATE
Donna L. Wray lives on Madison Avenue, just north of Drew Street.The home, Pinellas court records indicate, is in foreclosure.
FLORIDA: Fla. Stat. §673.5051
CLEARWATER (TRAINER)
DONNA L WRAY Member since 11/25/2009
(727) 449-9419[email protected]
DEADMAN ESTATE
Donna L. Wray lives on Madison Avenue, just north of Drew Street.The home, Pinellas court records indicate, is in foreclosure.
FLORIDA: Fla. Stat. §673.5051
CLEARWATER (TRAINER)
DONNA L WRAY Member since 11/25/2009
(727) 449-9419[email protected]
A World War II veteran who became involved in the tax protest movement in the late 1960s, about the same time he converted to Christian Identity, Kahl stopped paying taxes in 1969; in 1973, he joined the Posse Comitatus and became a state coordinator for the Posse in Texas
In 1983, Kahl demonstrated to the entire nation that the tax protest movement was willing to go much further than simply evading taxes. A World War II veteran who became involved in the tax protest movement in the late 1960s, about the same time he converted to Christian Identity, Kahl stopped paying taxes in 1969; in 1973, he joined the Posse Comitatus and became a state coordinator for the Posse in Texas. The I.R.S. became interested in his activity after he appeared on television in 1974; three years later he was convicted on tax charges and sentenced to one year in jail and five years' probation. Following his release, Kahl again refused to file an income tax return, thereby violating the terms of his probation. In 1981, a warrant was issued for his arrest, but United States marshals in North Dakota, where Kahl now lived, were not eager to confront the well-armed tax resister. When they finally did attempt to bring him in, in February 1983, their earlier reluctance proved well- founded. Stopped at a roadblock, Kahl opened fire, killing two marshals and injuring several others before fleeing. It took law enforcement officers four months to track Kahl to a remote farmhouse in Arkansas, where he killed a local sheriff before dying himself in a final shootout.
http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/TPM.asp?xpicked=4&item=21
http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/TPM.asp?xpicked=4&item=21
William M. Parente Irrevocable Insurance Trust.
The trust is the owner and beneficiary of a $5 million life insurance policy on his life;
Victims Of Dead Lawyer’s Ponzi Scheme Can Collect On Life Insurance Policy, Court Says Submitted by Steven Meyerowitz on Thu, 06/10/2010 - 9:21am Long Island lawyer William Parente died April 20, 2009. It appears that he murdered his wife, Betty Ann, and their two children, Stephanie Ann and Catherine Ann, and then took his own life. Apparently, Parente also was involved in a Ponzi scheme.
Before his death, Parente created the William M. Parente Irrevocable Insurance Trust. The trust is the owner and beneficiary of a $5 million life insurance policy on his life; the beneficiaries of the trust are Parente's wife and children.
A question arose as to whether Parente’s heirs were entitled to the proceeds of the policy, or whether investors who lost their investments in the alleged Ponzi scheme – more than two dozen people whose collective claims against Parente for investment losses exceeded $25 million – were entitled to the proceeds.
A court has just sided with the investors. The court explained that it was undisputed that Betty, Stephanie and Catherine predeceased William and that Betty died first, followed by Catherine, then Stephanie and finally William. The court added that it also was undisputed that the trust was silent as to the disposition of the trust remainder in the event that Betty, Stephanie and Catherine predeceased William.
Thus, the court reasoned, under state law, the proceeds of the insurance trust reverted to William or his estate, and were subject to claims of his creditors.
http://www.financialfraudlaw.com/lawblog/victims-dead-lawyer%E2%80%99s-ponzi-scheme-can-collect-life-insurance-policy-court-says/1115
Jack Dolan of the American Council of Life Insurers, an industry trade group, says that "as a general rule" anyone who is convicted in court or remains under investigation for killing someone in order to collect a life insurance benefit will not receive the payout.
"The fact that a beneficiary is not charged with a crime or is not convicted in a criminal proceeding of wrongfully killing the insured does not mean that the beneficiary is automatically entitled to receive the policy proceeds," Dolan says.http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourLife/killed-for-insurance-money.aspx
Ponzi case moved to Calgary
http://www.drumhellermail.com/home/local-news/9655-ponzi-case-moved-to-calgary.html
Wednesday, 23 March 2011 09:38 Pat Kolafa | © DrumhellerMail.com
Four people charged in an alleged $60 million Ponzi scheme will now have their cases heard in Calgary. In March of last year, Murray Stark of Three Hills, Robert Fyn of Linden and Garth S. Bailey of Okotoks were each charged with fraud over $5,000 and conspiracy to commit fraud.
Stark, Fyn, Bailey and Katherine Rodrique Bailey of Okotoks were also charged with laundering proceeds of crime and conspiracy to launder proceeds of crime.
They initially appeared in provincial court in Drumheller on April 16, 2010.
Counsel appeared as agents for three of the four accused in provincial court in Drumheller on Friday, March 18. Special Prosecutor Peter Mackenzie spoke for the Crown.
Mackenzie told the court the four were charged in the spring of last year and Special Prosecutor Susan Mulligan initially held the file, however she is no longer with the office. Mackenzie took over the file in November of last year.
Because the Drumheller court house would not be able to accommodate the extensive case, he proposed that it be moved to the Calgary Court Centre.
The four are to appear on April 15 in Calgary.
According to the original police release, the RCMP Calgary Commercial Crime Section launched this investigation in 2004 and believe approximately one thousand victims throughout North America invested more than 60 million US dollars into various alleged fraudulent investment programs offered by HMS Financial.
Investors allege that their investments with HMS Financial were to return 8 - 12% or more per month.
Investors were told their investments were risk free, alleging they were advised that Garth Bailey, HMS Financial's lawyer, held bonds valued in the millions of dollars which would be liquidated should the investments fail to pay out.
Investigators have not been able to identify the existence of any bonds and believe this high yield investment program was a Ponzi scheme. It is alleged that in order to perpetuate the scheme and entice new investors, HMS Financial paid 10 per cent a month every quarter to those investors who chose to accept a quarterly payout of interest. The payments are believed to have been drawn from funds provided by other HMS clientele.
Investigators believe the investment program operated by HMS Financial failed in March 2004 when HMS Financial could not meet their payout obligations. HMS Financial collapsed just as the RCMP investigation began.
http://www.drumhellermail.com/home/local-news/9655-ponzi-case-moved-to-calgary.html
Wednesday, 23 March 2011 09:38 Pat Kolafa | © DrumhellerMail.com
Four people charged in an alleged $60 million Ponzi scheme will now have their cases heard in Calgary. In March of last year, Murray Stark of Three Hills, Robert Fyn of Linden and Garth S. Bailey of Okotoks were each charged with fraud over $5,000 and conspiracy to commit fraud.
Stark, Fyn, Bailey and Katherine Rodrique Bailey of Okotoks were also charged with laundering proceeds of crime and conspiracy to launder proceeds of crime.
They initially appeared in provincial court in Drumheller on April 16, 2010.
Counsel appeared as agents for three of the four accused in provincial court in Drumheller on Friday, March 18. Special Prosecutor Peter Mackenzie spoke for the Crown.
Mackenzie told the court the four were charged in the spring of last year and Special Prosecutor Susan Mulligan initially held the file, however she is no longer with the office. Mackenzie took over the file in November of last year.
Because the Drumheller court house would not be able to accommodate the extensive case, he proposed that it be moved to the Calgary Court Centre.
The four are to appear on April 15 in Calgary.
According to the original police release, the RCMP Calgary Commercial Crime Section launched this investigation in 2004 and believe approximately one thousand victims throughout North America invested more than 60 million US dollars into various alleged fraudulent investment programs offered by HMS Financial.
Investors allege that their investments with HMS Financial were to return 8 - 12% or more per month.
Investors were told their investments were risk free, alleging they were advised that Garth Bailey, HMS Financial's lawyer, held bonds valued in the millions of dollars which would be liquidated should the investments fail to pay out.
Investigators have not been able to identify the existence of any bonds and believe this high yield investment program was a Ponzi scheme. It is alleged that in order to perpetuate the scheme and entice new investors, HMS Financial paid 10 per cent a month every quarter to those investors who chose to accept a quarterly payout of interest. The payments are believed to have been drawn from funds provided by other HMS clientele.
Investigators believe the investment program operated by HMS Financial failed in March 2004 when HMS Financial could not meet their payout obligations. HMS Financial collapsed just as the RCMP investigation began.
Does killing for insurance ever pay? Not only is it a horrific crime, it's insurance fraud. And not being convicted (or even charged) in a death does not necessarily mean a beneficiary can collect.
[Related content: insurance, life insurance, insurance companies, policies, insurance rates] By Insure.com
It's a timeworn plot twist in movies: A wealthy family patriarch is killed and the killer turns out to be the spouse, offspring or business partner -- who just happens to be the beneficiary of the departed's enormous life insurance policy!
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourLife/killed-for-insurance-money.aspx
HSBC IN HOUSE BANK LAWYER
CAMERON CAMPBELL
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
LA JOLLA CALIFORNIA
CEDAR MANAGEMENT
ALBERTA, BC ,ONTARIO,QUEBEC PROVINCIAL GOVERMENT AND SITTING MPS STAND ACCUSED OF laundering proceeds of crime and conspiracy to launder proceeds of crime.
ALBERTA LAWS SOCIETY
MASTERMINDING INTERNATIONAL PAPER TERRORISM
Alger Management has been in the business of providing investment advisory
services since 1964
LEGAL AID FOR CANADIAN US TRANPLANTS IN COLLUSION WITH US SOVEREIGN CITIZENS
HMS PONZIE
MASTERMINDING INTERNATIONAL PAPER TERRORISM
Alger Management has been in the business of providing investment advisory
services since 1964
LEGAL AID FOR CANADIAN US TRANPLANTS IN COLLUSION WITH US SOVEREIGN CITIZENS
HMS PONZIE
http://www.secinfo.com/dScj2.75q.htm#vya
Alger Management is owned by Alger Inc. which in turn is
owned by Alger Associates, Inc. ("Associates"), a financial services holding
company. Fred M. Alger III and his brother, David D. Alger, are the majority
shareholders of Associates and may be deemed to control that company and its
subsidiaries.
ORGANIZATION
From its inception in 1968 until February 12, 1996, the Fund was organized as
a Massachusetts business corporation, and it had operated as a registered
closed-end investment company since 1978. Shares of closed-end investment
companies, unlike those of open-end companies, are ordinarily not redeemable and
are not continuously offered for sale to the public.
On February 12, 1996, the
Fund reorganized as a Massachusetts business trust and also converted to an
open-end investment company, or "mutual fund." In connection with the
reorganization, the name of the Fund was changed from "Spectra Fund, Inc." to
"Spectra Fund." The Fund is authorized to offer an unlimited number of shares.
GUYONS INTERNATIONALINC..
INCORPORATED UNDER sovereign laws of the province of ALBERTA
Bonaventure v. Aurora Loan Services UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on March 9, 2010.
March 9, 2010
BRUCE GRANT BONAVENTURE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; FASLO SOLUTIONS, LLC; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.; LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDING CORPORATION, INC.; LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB; CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, INC.; JOHN COPELAND; AND DONNA MOCH; DEFENDANTS.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) and memorandum in support (Doc. 25) filed by Defendants Aurora Loan Services, LLC ("Aurora"), Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB ("Lehman"), and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. ("MERS") (collectively, the "Movants"),
and the response (Doc. 28) and memorandum in support (Doc. 29) filed by the Plaintiff, Bruce Grant Bonaventure ("Bonaventure").
Bonaventure, who is proceeding pro se, filed the instant suit on August 3, 2009 and filed his four-count Amended Complaint (Doc. 23) on January 5, 2010. Bonaventure is also a defendant in a state court foreclosure suit and has filed a petition in bankruptcy. The Movants suggest that the instant case involves many of the same issues that were raised, or should have been raised, in the state court proceedings, in which the trial court has already ruled against Bonaventure.*fn1 In these proceedings, the Movants contend that Bonaventure has failed to state a claim for relief, and they seek dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.*fn2
In his Amended Complaint, Bonaventure asserts that the case involves claims for breach of contract; tortious interference under RESPA; violations of HOEPA, Reg. Z, TILA, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; gross negligence; abuse of process; fraud; and conspiracy. (Doc. 23 at 3). It is not clear which claims Bonaventure intends to assert against which defendants. After review of the entire Amended Complaint, the Court finds that Bonaventure has failed to state a claim as to any of these causes of action as to any of the Movants.
Charitably construed, the allegations set forth by Bonaventure in the Amended Complaint as to the Movants are as follows: In Count I, Bonaventure contends that Aurora (1) as "preparer" of some unidentified contract, somehow changed that contract without Bonaventure's knowledge; (2) in connection with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, could not produce the original of some unidentified promissory note, or a true copy, despite a demand to do so, presumably from Bonaventure; (3) wrongfully used "trade secrets" as a defense to deny Bonaventure certain information, including information about "formation of improper trusteeship, and free of mortgage/promissory note improperly representing a different monthly mortgage payment"; (4) violated the "laws and covenants" of Defendant MERS by filing an action to re-establish a lost note; (5) somehow misrepresented a 'Service List' to delay discovery; (6) improperly sold certain mortgage servicing rights; (7) fraudulently filed a false affidavit, resulting in the entry of summary judgment of foreclosure; and (8) committed fraud and conspired with MERS, CT and Faslo to wrongfully take Bonaventure's homestead. (Doc. 23 at 4-7).
Count II is asserted solely against Faslo (aside from a reiteration of the claim that Aurora, MERS, and CT wrongfully sought to take Bonaventure's homestead). (Doc. 23 at 9). In Count III, Bonaventure asserts that MERS conspired with Aurora to misrepresent, on a service list throughout some other proceedings -- presumably the state court proceedings -- that CT was its registered agent, resulting in the entry of judgment.*fn3 (Doc. 23 at 10-11). In Count IV, Bonaventure contends that (1) a representative of MERS, John Copeland, received/acknowledged valid service, at a phantom Post Office box, "where free of mortgage misrepresents a Michigan address"; (2) that MERS did not timely satisfy a loan or loans involving another lender, IndyMac, before entering Bonaventure's current mortgages, creating (or resulting in) a "broken chain of title"; (3) that MERS hides fraudulent transfers, double recording, changing of beneficiaries and missing trust assets for its members, Aurora, Faslo, IndyMac, and Lehman; (4) that MERS protects Aurora and Faslo from records disclosure, and that Bonaventure's "foreclosure proceeds" could be electronically transferred offshore; and (5) Aurora (in some unexplained fashion) improperly designated MERS as a lienholder, although MERS was supposed to act solely as a nominee, and MERS (in some unexplained fashion) used off-balance sheet accounting to maintain the deception.*fn4
As the Movants point out (Doc. 25 at 15-21), to the extent that Bonaventure's vague allegations can be deciphered, they fail to state a claim for any of the causes of action listed in the Amended Complaint. In his response, Bonaventure makes no effort to show that his pleading satisfies the applicable rules of civil procedure or states a valid claim. Instead, he reiterates the allegations from the Amended Complaint and adds many new ones. After going over each of the counts in detail, and carefully reviewing Bonaventure's response to the motion to dismiss, the Court finds that none of them state a valid claim for breach of contract, or tortious interference, or violations of RESPA, HOEPA, Reg. Z, TILA, or the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, or gross negligence, or abuse of process, or fraud, or conspiracy. Accordingly, Counts I, III, and IV are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on March 9, 2010.
March 9, 2010
BRUCE GRANT BONAVENTURE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; FASLO SOLUTIONS, LLC; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.; LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDING CORPORATION, INC.; LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB; CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, INC.; JOHN COPELAND; AND DONNA MOCH; DEFENDANTS.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) and memorandum in support (Doc. 25) filed by Defendants Aurora Loan Services, LLC ("Aurora"), Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB ("Lehman"), and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. ("MERS") (collectively, the "Movants"),
and the response (Doc. 28) and memorandum in support (Doc. 29) filed by the Plaintiff, Bruce Grant Bonaventure ("Bonaventure").
Bonaventure, who is proceeding pro se, filed the instant suit on August 3, 2009 and filed his four-count Amended Complaint (Doc. 23) on January 5, 2010. Bonaventure is also a defendant in a state court foreclosure suit and has filed a petition in bankruptcy. The Movants suggest that the instant case involves many of the same issues that were raised, or should have been raised, in the state court proceedings, in which the trial court has already ruled against Bonaventure.*fn1 In these proceedings, the Movants contend that Bonaventure has failed to state a claim for relief, and they seek dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.*fn2
In his Amended Complaint, Bonaventure asserts that the case involves claims for breach of contract; tortious interference under RESPA; violations of HOEPA, Reg. Z, TILA, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; gross negligence; abuse of process; fraud; and conspiracy. (Doc. 23 at 3). It is not clear which claims Bonaventure intends to assert against which defendants. After review of the entire Amended Complaint, the Court finds that Bonaventure has failed to state a claim as to any of these causes of action as to any of the Movants.
Charitably construed, the allegations set forth by Bonaventure in the Amended Complaint as to the Movants are as follows: In Count I, Bonaventure contends that Aurora (1) as "preparer" of some unidentified contract, somehow changed that contract without Bonaventure's knowledge; (2) in connection with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, could not produce the original of some unidentified promissory note, or a true copy, despite a demand to do so, presumably from Bonaventure; (3) wrongfully used "trade secrets" as a defense to deny Bonaventure certain information, including information about "formation of improper trusteeship, and free of mortgage/promissory note improperly representing a different monthly mortgage payment"; (4) violated the "laws and covenants" of Defendant MERS by filing an action to re-establish a lost note; (5) somehow misrepresented a 'Service List' to delay discovery; (6) improperly sold certain mortgage servicing rights; (7) fraudulently filed a false affidavit, resulting in the entry of summary judgment of foreclosure; and (8) committed fraud and conspired with MERS, CT and Faslo to wrongfully take Bonaventure's homestead. (Doc. 23 at 4-7).
Count II is asserted solely against Faslo (aside from a reiteration of the claim that Aurora, MERS, and CT wrongfully sought to take Bonaventure's homestead). (Doc. 23 at 9). In Count III, Bonaventure asserts that MERS conspired with Aurora to misrepresent, on a service list throughout some other proceedings -- presumably the state court proceedings -- that CT was its registered agent, resulting in the entry of judgment.*fn3 (Doc. 23 at 10-11). In Count IV, Bonaventure contends that (1) a representative of MERS, John Copeland, received/acknowledged valid service, at a phantom Post Office box, "where free of mortgage misrepresents a Michigan address"; (2) that MERS did not timely satisfy a loan or loans involving another lender, IndyMac, before entering Bonaventure's current mortgages, creating (or resulting in) a "broken chain of title"; (3) that MERS hides fraudulent transfers, double recording, changing of beneficiaries and missing trust assets for its members, Aurora, Faslo, IndyMac, and Lehman; (4) that MERS protects Aurora and Faslo from records disclosure, and that Bonaventure's "foreclosure proceeds" could be electronically transferred offshore; and (5) Aurora (in some unexplained fashion) improperly designated MERS as a lienholder, although MERS was supposed to act solely as a nominee, and MERS (in some unexplained fashion) used off-balance sheet accounting to maintain the deception.*fn4
As the Movants point out (Doc. 25 at 15-21), to the extent that Bonaventure's vague allegations can be deciphered, they fail to state a claim for any of the causes of action listed in the Amended Complaint. In his response, Bonaventure makes no effort to show that his pleading satisfies the applicable rules of civil procedure or states a valid claim. Instead, he reiterates the allegations from the Amended Complaint and adds many new ones. After going over each of the counts in detail, and carefully reviewing Bonaventure's response to the motion to dismiss, the Court finds that none of them state a valid claim for breach of contract, or tortious interference, or violations of RESPA, HOEPA, Reg. Z, TILA, or the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, or gross negligence, or abuse of process, or fraud, or conspiracy. Accordingly, Counts I, III, and IV are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Evidence :
Anything Properly ADMISSIBLE in a Court, that will aid the function of a criminal proceeding in establishing guilt or innocence.
THE AGENT FOR THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF BC
SUSAN V CARR
IGNORED THE FINAL ORDER OF THE BC SUPREME COURT
DATED JUNE 19 1995
BY JUSTICE MEIKLEM
CAMPBELL RIVER
FAMILY COURT
MAKES ANY TYPE OF ESTATE IT WANTS BY DEFACING THE QUEENS WRIT
LAWLESS CORRUPT COURTHOUSE
Is this really the judges order?
I THINK NOT
Mortgage Assignment Fraud - David Sterns Office Commits Fraud on The Court - Case Dismissed WITH Prejudice Foreclosure Fraud | April 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM | Tags:
U.S. Bank National Assoc., as Trustee v. Ernest E. Harpster Sl-2007-CA-6684-ES
Via Matt Weidners Blog at http://www.mattweidnerlaw.com
Well well well...
Looks like an Assignment of Mortgage was FRAUDULENTLY created by David Sterns office and signed by Cheryl Samons. Who woulda thunk...
"By now the fact that foreclosure mills, pretender lenders and their document mills across the country are perpetrating widespread and systemic fraud on the courts is not news. Well sure major questions remain unanswered such as what will be the ultimate price of all this fraud…as reported previously much of this fraud will go unpunished because much of the evidence is apparently being sent back to the law firms that commit the fraud. (In violation of court rules) But so much is sliding by these days.
We all must do everything we can to bring fraud to the court’s attention and to preserve the evidence when it is found. Attached here is the brilliant work of a Foreclosure Fraud Fighter, Ralph Fisher of Tampa, Florida who shows us what the courts are willing to do when a good attorney makes AND PROVES a case of fraud…..Case dismissed WITH PREJUDICE".
U.S. Bank National Assoc., as Trustee v. Ernest E. Harpster Sl-2007-CA-6684-ES
Via Matt Weidners Blog at http://www.mattweidnerlaw.com
Well well well...
Looks like an Assignment of Mortgage was FRAUDULENTLY created by David Sterns office and signed by Cheryl Samons. Who woulda thunk...
"By now the fact that foreclosure mills, pretender lenders and their document mills across the country are perpetrating widespread and systemic fraud on the courts is not news. Well sure major questions remain unanswered such as what will be the ultimate price of all this fraud…as reported previously much of this fraud will go unpunished because much of the evidence is apparently being sent back to the law firms that commit the fraud. (In violation of court rules) But so much is sliding by these days.
We all must do everything we can to bring fraud to the court’s attention and to preserve the evidence when it is found. Attached here is the brilliant work of a Foreclosure Fraud Fighter, Ralph Fisher of Tampa, Florida who shows us what the courts are willing to do when a good attorney makes AND PROVES a case of fraud…..Case dismissed WITH PREJUDICE".
AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST
OF
SPECTRA FUND
Dated _____________ __, 199__
This AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST, dated the
___ day of ______ 199
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
Although, as a Massachusetts business trust, the Fund is not required by law
to hold annual shareholder meetings, it may hold meetings from time to time on
important matters, and shareholders have the right to call a meeting to remove a
Trustee or to take other action described in the Trust's Declaration of Trust.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
The Fund is governed by a Board of Trustees which is responsible for
protecting the interests of shareholders under Massachusetts law. The Statement
of Additional Information contains general background information about each
Trustee and officer of the Fund.
INVESTMENT MANAGER
Alger Management is the Fund's investment manager and is responsible for the
overall administration of the Fund, subject to the supervision of the Board of
Trustees. Alger Management makes investment decisions for the Fund, places
orders to purchase and sell securities on behalf of the Fund and selects
broker-dealers that, in its judgment, provide prompt and reliable execution at
favorable prices and reasonable commission rates. It is anticipated that Alger
Inc. will serve as the Fund's broker in effecting substantially all of the
Fund's transactions on securities exchanges and will retain commissions in
accordance with certain regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Fund will consider sales of its shares as a factor in the selection of
broker-dealers to execute over-the-counter portfolio transactions, subject to
the requirements of best price and execution. Alger Management employs
professional securities analysts who provide research services exclusively to
the Fund and other accounts for which Alger Management or its affiliates serve
as investment adviser or subadviser.
Alger Management has been in the business of providing investment advisory
services since 1964
6
485BPOS 14th Page of 40 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 14th
and, as of January 31, 1998, had approximately $7.8 billion under management,
consisting of $4.5 billion in mutual fund accounts and $3.3 billion in other
advisory accounts.
AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST
OF
SPECTRA FUND
Dated _____________ __, 199__
This AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST, dated the
___ day of ______ 199
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
Although, as a Massachusetts business trust, the Fund is not required by law
to hold annual shareholder meetings, it may hold meetings from time to time on
important matters, and shareholders have the right to call a meeting to remove a
Trustee or to take other action described in the Trust's Declaration of Trust.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
The Fund is governed by a Board of Trustees which is responsible for
protecting the interests of shareholders under Massachusetts law. The Statement
of Additional Information contains general background information about each
Trustee and officer of the Fund.
INVESTMENT MANAGER
Alger Management is the Fund's investment manager and is responsible for the
overall administration of the Fund, subject to the supervision of the Board of
Trustees. Alger Management makes investment decisions for the Fund, places
orders to purchase and sell securities on behalf of the Fund and selects
broker-dealers that, in its judgment, provide prompt and reliable execution at
favorable prices and reasonable commission rates. It is anticipated that Alger
Inc. will serve as the Fund's broker in effecting substantially all of the
Fund's transactions on securities exchanges and will retain commissions in
accordance with certain regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Fund will consider sales of its shares as a factor in the selection of
broker-dealers to execute over-the-counter portfolio transactions, subject to
the requirements of best price and execution. Alger Management employs
professional securities analysts who provide research services exclusively to
the Fund and other accounts for which Alger Management or its affiliates serve
as investment adviser or subadviser.
Alger Management has been in the business of providing investment advisory
services since 1964
6
485BPOS 14th Page of 40 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 14th
and, as of January 31, 1998, had approximately $7.8 billion under management,
consisting of $4.5 billion in mutual fund accounts and $3.3 billion in other
advisory accounts.
SECTION 10.5 USE OF THE NAME "SPECTRA". Fred Alger Management Co., Inc.
("Alger") has consented to the use by the Trust of the identifying name
"Spectra," which is a property right of Alger. The Trust will only use the name
'Spectra" as a component of its name and for no other purpose, and will not
purport to grant to any third party the right to use the name "Spectra" for any
purpose. Alger or any corporate affiliate of Alger may use or grant to others
the right to use the name "Spectra," as all or a portion of a corporate or
business name or for any commercial purpose, including a grant of such right to
any other investment company. At the request of Alger, the Trust will take such
action as may be required to provide its consent to the use of such name by
Alger, or any corporate affiliate of Alger, or by any Person to whom Alger or an
affiliate of Alger shall have granted the right to the use of the name
"Spectra." Upon the termination of any investment advisory or management
agreement into which Alger and the Trust may enter, the Trust shall, upon
request by Alger, cease to use the name "Spectra" as a component of its name,
and shall not use such name or initials as a part of its name or for any other
commercial purpose. and shall cause its officers and Trustees to take any and
all actions which Alger may request to effect the foregoing and to reconvey to
Alger or such corporate affiliate any and all rights to such name.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, constituting a Majority of the
Trustees, have hereunto set their hands and the seal of the Trust, all as of the
18 day of February, 1997.
/s/ DAVID D. ALGER
---------------------------------- ---------------------------
FRED M. ALGER DAVID D. ALGER
/s/ NATHAN E. SAINT-AMAND /s/ STEPHEN E. O'NEIL
---------------------------------- ---------------------------
NATHAN E. SAINT-AMAND STEPHEN E. O'NEIL
/s/ ARTHUR M. DUBOW /s/ JOHN T. SARGENT
---------------------------------- ---------------------------
ARTHUR M. DUBOW JOHN T. SARGENT
EX-1 Last Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 34th
-29-
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF New York )
:ss.
COUNTY OF New York)
2/18/1997
Then personally appeared the above-named Trustees and acknowledged the
foregoing instrument to be his/her free act and deed.
Before me,
/s/ Dolores M. Costa
---------------------------
Notary Public
My commission expires 8/15/98
[NOTARIAL SEAL] DOLORES M. COSTA
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York
No. 31-4941104
Qualified in New York County
Commission Expires 8/15/98
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated By Reference Referenced-On Page This 485BPOS Filing Date First Last Other Filings 6/27/95 8 7/5/95 6 2/18/97 1 Filed On / Filed As Of / Effective As Of 2/27/98 Top
("Alger") has consented to the use by the Trust of the identifying name
"Spectra," which is a property right of Alger. The Trust will only use the name
'Spectra" as a component of its name and for no other purpose, and will not
purport to grant to any third party the right to use the name "Spectra" for any
purpose. Alger or any corporate affiliate of Alger may use or grant to others
the right to use the name "Spectra," as all or a portion of a corporate or
business name or for any commercial purpose, including a grant of such right to
any other investment company. At the request of Alger, the Trust will take such
action as may be required to provide its consent to the use of such name by
Alger, or any corporate affiliate of Alger, or by any Person to whom Alger or an
affiliate of Alger shall have granted the right to the use of the name
"Spectra." Upon the termination of any investment advisory or management
agreement into which Alger and the Trust may enter, the Trust shall, upon
request by Alger, cease to use the name "Spectra" as a component of its name,
and shall not use such name or initials as a part of its name or for any other
commercial purpose. and shall cause its officers and Trustees to take any and
all actions which Alger may request to effect the foregoing and to reconvey to
Alger or such corporate affiliate any and all rights to such name.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, constituting a Majority of the
Trustees, have hereunto set their hands and the seal of the Trust, all as of the
18 day of February, 1997.
/s/ DAVID D. ALGER
---------------------------------- ---------------------------
FRED M. ALGER DAVID D. ALGER
/s/ NATHAN E. SAINT-AMAND /s/ STEPHEN E. O'NEIL
---------------------------------- ---------------------------
NATHAN E. SAINT-AMAND STEPHEN E. O'NEIL
/s/ ARTHUR M. DUBOW /s/ JOHN T. SARGENT
---------------------------------- ---------------------------
ARTHUR M. DUBOW JOHN T. SARGENT
EX-1 Last Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 34th
-29-
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF New York )
:ss.
COUNTY OF New York)
2/18/1997
Then personally appeared the above-named Trustees and acknowledged the
foregoing instrument to be his/her free act and deed.
Before me,
/s/ Dolores M. Costa
---------------------------
Notary Public
My commission expires 8/15/98
[NOTARIAL SEAL] DOLORES M. COSTA
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York
No. 31-4941104
Qualified in New York County
Commission Expires 8/15/98
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated By Reference Referenced-On Page This 485BPOS Filing Date First Last Other Filings 6/27/95 8 7/5/95 6 2/18/97 1 Filed On / Filed As Of / Effective As Of 2/27/98 Top
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, Spectra Fund, a trust with transferable shares under the laws
of Massachusetts (the "TRUST"), was established on July 5, 1995 pursuant to an
Agreement and Declaration of Trust of that date (referred to in these Recitals
as the "DECLARATION"); and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides that the assets held by the Trustees
be divided into separate portfolios, each with its own separate investment
assets, investment objectives, policies and purposes, and that the beneficial
interest in each such portfolio shall be divided into transferable Shares of
Beneficial Interest, a separate Series of Shares for each portfolio, all in
accordance with the provisions hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides that the Trust be managed and
operated as a trust with transferable shares under the laws of Massachusetts, of
the type commonly known as and referred to as a Massachusetts business trust, in
accordance with the provisions hereinafter set forth, and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides that the Declaration and all
amendments thereto may be restated as a single instrument if executed by a
Majority of the Trustees; and
WHEREAS, the Declaration has been amended in certain respects, and the
Trustees of the Trust desire to effect such a restatement,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Trustees hereby declare that they will hold all
money and property of every type and description which they now hold or may
hereafter in any way acquire in their capacity as such Trustees. together with
the income therefrom and the proceeds thereof, IN TRUST NEVERTHELESS, to manage
and dispose of the same for the benefit of the holders from time to time of the
Shares of Beneficial Interest of the several Series issued and to be issued
hereunder and in the manner and subject to the provisions hereof, to wit:
WHEREAS, Spectra Fund, a trust with transferable shares under the laws
of Massachusetts (the "TRUST"), was established on July 5, 1995 pursuant to an
Agreement and Declaration of Trust of that date (referred to in these Recitals
as the "DECLARATION"); and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides that the assets held by the Trustees
be divided into separate portfolios, each with its own separate investment
assets, investment objectives, policies and purposes, and that the beneficial
interest in each such portfolio shall be divided into transferable Shares of
Beneficial Interest, a separate Series of Shares for each portfolio, all in
accordance with the provisions hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides that the Trust be managed and
operated as a trust with transferable shares under the laws of Massachusetts, of
the type commonly known as and referred to as a Massachusetts business trust, in
accordance with the provisions hereinafter set forth, and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides that the Declaration and all
amendments thereto may be restated as a single instrument if executed by a
Majority of the Trustees; and
WHEREAS, the Declaration has been amended in certain respects, and the
Trustees of the Trust desire to effect such a restatement,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Trustees hereby declare that they will hold all
money and property of every type and description which they now hold or may
hereafter in any way acquire in their capacity as such Trustees. together with
the income therefrom and the proceeds thereof, IN TRUST NEVERTHELESS, to manage
and dispose of the same for the benefit of the holders from time to time of the
Shares of Beneficial Interest of the several Series issued and to be issued
hereunder and in the manner and subject to the provisions hereof, to wit:
ARTICLE 1
THE TRUST
SECTION 1.1 NAME. The name of the Trust shall be
"SPECTRA FUND"
and so far as may be practicable the Trustees Shall conduct the Trust's
activities, execute all documents and Declaration of Trust, except where the
context otherwise requires) shall refer to the Trustees in their capacity as
trustees, and not individually or personally, and shall not refer to the
officers, agents or employees of the Trust or of such Trustees, or to the
holders of the Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust, of any Series or
EX-1 7th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 7th
-2-
Class. If the Trustees determine that the use of such name is not practicable,
legal or convenient at any time or in any jurisdiction, or if the Trust is
required to discontinue the use of such name pursuant to Section 10.5 hereof,
then subject to that Section, the Trustees may use such other designation, or
they may adopt such other name for the Trust as they deem proper, and the Trust
may hold property and conduct its activities under such designation or name.
SECTION 1.2 LOCATION. The Trust shall have an office in Boston,
Massachusetts, unless changed by the Trustees to another location in
Massachusetts or elsewhere, but such office need not be the sole or principal
office of the Trust. The Trust may have such other offices or places of business
as the Trustees may from time to time determine to be necessary or expedient.
SECTION 1.3 NATURE OF TRUST. The Trust shall be a trust with
transferable shares under the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, of the
type referred to in Section 1 of Chapter 182 of the Massachusetts General Laws
and commonly termed a Massachusetts business trust The Trust is not intended to
be, shall not be deemed to be, and shall not be treated as, a general
partnership, limited partnership, joint venture, corporation or joint stock
company. The Shareholders shall be beneficiaries and their relationship to the
Trustees shall be solely in that capacity in accordance with the rights
conferred upon them hereunder.
SECTION 1.4 DEFINITIONS As used in this Agreement and Declaration of
Trust, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below unless the
context thereof otherwise requires:
"ACCOUNTING AGENT" shall have the meaning designated in Section 5.2(g)
hereof,
"ADMINISTRATOR" shall have the meaning designated in Section 5.2(b)
hereof.
"AFFILIATED PERSON" shall have the meaning assigned to it in the 1940
Act.
"BYLAWS" shall mean the Bylaws of the Trust, as amended from time to
time.
"CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION" shall have the meaning designated in
Section 6.1 hereof.
"CERTIFICATE OF TERMINATION" shall have the meaning designated in
Section 6.1 hereof.
"CLASS" or "CLASSES" shall mean, with respect to any Series, any Shares
of such Series in respect of which the Trustees shall from time to time fix and
determine any special provisions relating to sales charges, any rights of
redemption and the price, terms and manner of redemption, special and relative
rights as to dividends and other distributions and on liquidation, sinking or
purchase fund provisions, conversion rights, and conditions under which the
Shareholders of such Class shall have separate voting rights or no voting
rights.
"COMMISSION" shall have the same meaning as in the 1940 Act.
"CONTRACTING PARTY" shall have the meaning designated in the preamble
to Section 5.2 hereof.
"COVERED PERSON" shall have the meaning designated in Section 8.4
hereof.
"CUSTODIAN" shall have the meaning designated in Section 5.2(d) hereof.
"DECLARATION" and "DECLARATION OF TRUST" shall mean this Agreement and
Declaration of Trust and all amendments or modifications thereof as from time to
time in effect. References in this Agreement and
EX-1 8th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 8th
-3-
Declaration of Trust to 9'hereof', "HEREIN" and "HEREUNDER" shall be deemed to
refer to the Declaration of Trust generally, and shall not be limited to the
particular text, Article or Section in which such words appear.
"DISABLING CONDUCT" shall have the meaning designated in Section 8.4
hereof.
"DISTRIBUTOR" shall have the meaning designated in Section 5.2(c)
hereof.
"DIVIDEND DISBURSING AGENT" shall have the meaning designated in
Section 5.2(e) hereof.
"GENERAL ITEMS" shall have the meaning defined in Section 6.2(a)
hereof.
"INTERNAL REVENUE CODE shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
from time to time amended and in effect, or any substituted statute dealing with
the same general subject matter as the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as in
effect on June 27, 1995, and in either case the rules and regulations thereunder
as from time to time interpreted and applied by applicable case law thereunder.
"INVESTMENT ADVISER" shall have the meaning stated in Section 5.2(a)
hereof.
"MAJORITY OF THE TRUSTEES" shall mean a majority of the Trustees in
office at the time in question. At any time at which there shall be only one (1)
Trustee in office, such term shall mean such Trustee.
"MAJORITY SHAREHOLDER VOTE," as used with respect to the election of
any Trustee at a meeting of Shareholders, shall mean the vote for the election
of such Trustee of a plurality of all outstanding Shares of the Trust, without
regard to Series or Class, represented in person or by proxy and entitled to
vote thereon, provided that a quorum (as determined in accordance with Section
7.5 hereof) is present, and as used with respect to any other action required or
permitted to be taken by Shareholders, shall mean the affirmative vote for such
action of the holders of that number of all outstanding Shares (or, where a
separate vote of Shares of any particular Series or Class is to be taken, the
affirmative vote of that number of the outstanding Shares of that Series or
Class) of the Trust which constitutes: (i) a majority of all Shares (or of
Shares of the particular Series or Class) represented in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote on such action at the meeting of Shareholders at which such
action is to be taken, provided that a quorum (as determined in accordance with
Section 7.5 hereof) is present; or (ii) if such action is to be taken by written
consent of Shareholders, a majority of all Shares (or of Shares of the
particular Series or Class) issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on such
action; PROVIDED, that (iii) as used with respect to any action requiring the
affirmative vote of "a majority of the outstanding voting securities", as the
quoted phrase is defined in the 1940 Act, of the Trust or of any Series or
Class, "MAJORITY SHAREHOLDER VOTE" means the vote for such action at a meeting
of Shareholders of the smallest majority of all outstanding Shares of the Trust
(or of Shares of the particular Series or Class) entitled to vote on such action
which satisfies such 1940 Act voting requirement.
"1940 ACT" shall mean the provisions of the Investment Company Act of
1940 and the rules and regulations thereunder, both as amended from time to
time, and any order or orders thereunder which may from time to time be
applicable to the Trust.
"PERSON" shall mean and include individuals, as well as corporations,
limited partnerships, general partnerships, joint stock companies, joint
ventures, associations, banks, trust companies, land trusts, business trusts or
other organizations established under the laws of any jurisdiction whether or
not considered to be legal entities, and governments and agencies and political
subdivisions thereof.
"PORTFOLIO" or "PORTFOLIOS" shall mean one or more of the separate
components of the assets of the Trust which are now or hereafter established and
designated under or in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 hereof.
EX-1 9th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 9th
-4-
"PORTFOLIO ASSETS" shall have the meaning defined in Section 6.2(a)
hereof.
"PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITER" shall have the meaning designated in Section
5.2(c) hereof.
"PROSPECTUS," as used with respect to any Portfolio or Series of
Shares, shall mean the prospectus relating to such Portfolio or Series which
constitutes part of the currently effective Registration Statement of the Trust
under the Securities Act of 1933, as such prospectus may be amended or
supplemented from time to time.
"SECURITIES" shall mean any and all bills, notes, bonds, debentures or
other obligations or evidences of indebtedness, certificates of deposit,
bankers' acceptances, commercial paper, repurchase agreements or other money
market instruments; stocks, shares or other equity ownership interests; and
warrants, options or other instruments representing rights to subscribe for,
purchase, receive or otherwise acquire or to sell, transfer, assign or otherwise
dispose of, and scrip, certificates, receipts or other instruments evidencing
any ownership rights or interests in, any of the foregoing and "when issued" and
"delayed delivery" contracts for securities, issued, guaranteed or sponsored by
any governments, political subdivisions or governmental authorities, agencies or
instrumentalities, by any individuals, firms, companies, corporations,
syndicates, associations or trusts, or by any other organizations or entities
whatsoever, irrespective of their forms or the names by which they may be
described, whether or not they be organized and operated for profit, and whether
they be domestic or foreign with respect to The Commonwealth of Massachusetts or
the United States of America.
"SECURITIES OF THE TRUST" shall mean any Securities issued by the
Trust.
"SERIES" shall mean one or more of the series of Shares authorized by
the Trustees, each to represent the beneficial interests in one of the
Portfolios of the Trust.
"SHAREHOLDER" shall mean as of any particular time any Person shown of
record at such time on the books of the Trust as a holder of outstanding Shares
of any Series or Class, and shall include a pledgee into whose name any such
Shares are transferred in pledge.
"SHAREHOLDER SERVICING AGENT" shall have the meaning designated in
Section 5.2(f) hereof.
"SHARES" shall mean the transferable units into which the beneficial
interest in the Trust and each Portfolio of the Trust (as the context may
require) shall be divided from time to time, and includes fractions of Shares as
well as whole Shares. All references herein to "Shares" which are not
accompanied by a reference to any particular Series or Portfolio shall be deemed
to apply to outstanding Shares without regard to Series or Class.
"SINGLE CLASS VOTING" as used with respect to any matter to be acted
upon at a meeting or by written consent of Shareholders, shall mean a style of
voting in which each holder of one or more Shares shall be entitled to one vote
on the matter in question for each Share standing in his name on the records of
the Trust, irrespective of Series or Class, and all outstanding Shares of all
Series or Class vote as a single class.
"STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION," as used with respect to any
Series or Class of Shares, shall mean the statement of additional information
relating to such Series or Class, which constitutes part of the currently
effective Registration Statement of the Trust under the Securities Act of 1933,
as such statement of additional information may be amended or supplemented from
time to time.
"TRANSFER AGENT" shall have the meaning defined in Section 5.2(e)
hereof.
"TRUST" shall have the meaning stated in the first "Whereas" clause set
forth above.
EX-1 10th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 10th
-5-
"TRUST PROPERTY" shall mean, as of any particular time, any and all
property which shall have been transferred, conveyed or paid to the Trust or the
Trustees, and all interest, dividends, income, earnings, profits and gains
therefrom, and proceeds thereof, including any proceeds derived from the sale,
exchange or liquidation thereof, and any hinds or payments derived from any
reinvestment of such proceeds in whatever form the same may be, and which at
such time is owned or held by, or for the account of, the Trust or the Trustees.
without regard to the Portfolio to which such property is allocated.
"TRUSTEES" shall mean, collectively, all individuals who at the time in
question have been duly elected or appointed as Trustees of the Trust in
accordance with the provisions hereof and who have qualified and are then in
office. At any time at which there shall be only one (1) Trustee in office, such
term shall mean such single Trustee.
SECTION 1.5 REAL PROPERTY TO BE CONVERTED INTO PERSONAL PROPERTY.
Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, any real property at any time
forming part of the Trust Property shall be held in trust for sale and
conversion into personal property at such time or times and in such manner and
upon such terms as the Trustees shall approve, but the Trustees shall have power
until the termination of this Trust to postpone such conversion as long as they
in their uncontrolled discretion shall think fit, and for the purpose of
determining the nature of the interest of the Shareholders therein, all such
real property shall at all times be considered as personal property.
ARTICLE 3
POWERS OF THE TRUSTEES
SECTION 3.1 POWERS IN GENERAL. The Trustees shall have, without other
or further authorization, full, entire, exclusive and absolute power, control
and authority over, and management of, the business of the Trust and over the
Trust Property, to the same extent as if the Trustees were the sole owners of
the business and property of the Trust in their own right, and with such powers
of delegation as may be permitted by this Declaration, subject only to such
limitations as may be expressly imposed by this Declaration of Trust or by
applicable law. The enumeration of any specific power or authority herein shall
not be construed as limiting
EX-1 11th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 11th
-6-
the aforesaid power or authority or any specific power or authority. Without
limiting the foregoing, the Trustees may adopt Bylaws not inconsistent with this
Declaration of Trust providing for the conduct of the business and affairs of
the Trust and may amend and repeal them to the extent that such Bylaws do not
reserve that right to the Shareholders; they may select, and from time to time
change, the fiscal year of the Trust; they may adopt and use a seal for the
Trust, PROVIDED, that unless otherwise required by the Trustees, it shall not be
necessary to place the seal upon, and its absence shall not impair the validity
of, any document, instrument or other paper executed and delivered by or on
behalf of the Trust; they may from time to time in accordance with the
provisions of Section 6.1 hereof establish one or more Portfolios to which they
may allocate such of the Trust Property, subject to such liabilities, as they
shall deem appropriate, each such Portfolio to be operated by the Trustees as a
separate and distinct investment medium and with separately defined investment
objectives and policies and distinct investment purposes, all as established by
the Trustees, or from time to time changed by them; they may as they consider
appropriate elect and remove officers and appoint and terminate agents and
consultants and hire and terminate employees, any one or more of the foregoing
of whom may be a Trustee; they may appoint from their own number, and terminate,
any one or more committees consisting of one or more Trustees, including without
implied limitation an Executive Committee, which may, when the Trustees are not
in session and subject to the 1940 Act, exercise some or all of the power and
authority of the Trustees as the Trustees may determine; in accordance with
Section 5.2 they may employ one or more Investment Advisers, Administrators and
Custodians and may authorize any Custodian to employ sub-custodians or agents
and to deposit all or any part of such assets in a system or systems for the
central handling of Securities, retain Transfer, Dividend Disbursing, Accounting
or Shareholder Servicing Agents or any of the foregoing, provide for the
distribution of Shares by the Trust through one or more Distributors, Principal
Underwriters or otherwise, set record dates or times for the determination of
Shareholders entitled to participate in, benefit from or act with respect to
various matters; and in general they may delegate to any officer of the Trust,
to any Committee of the Trustees and to any employee, Investment Adviser,
Administrator, Distributor, Custodian, Transfer Agent, Dividend Disbursing
Agent, or any other agent or consultant of the Trust, such authority, powers,
functions and duties as they consider desirable or appropriate for the conduct
of the business and affairs of the Trust, including without implied limitation
the power and authority to act in the name of the Trust and of the Trustees, to
sign documents and to act as attorney-in-fact for the Trustees Without limiting
the foregoing and to the extent not inconsistent with the 1940 Act or other
applicable law, the Trustees shall have power and authority:
(a) INVESTMENTS. To invest and reinvest cash and other
property; to buy, for cash or on margin, and otherwise acquire and
hold, Securities created or issued by any Persons, including Securities
maturing after the possible termination of the Trust; to make payment
therefor in any lawful manner in exchange for any of the Trust
Property; and to hold cash or other property uninvested without in any
event being bound or limited by any present or future law or custom in
regard to investments by trustees;
(b) DISPOSITION OF ASSETS. To lend, sell, exchange, mortgage,
pledge, hypothecate, grant security interests in, encumber, negotiate,
convey. transfer or otherwise dispose of, and to trade in, any and all
of the Trust Property, free and clear of all trusts, for cash or on
terms, with or without advertisement, and on such terms and conditions
as to payment, security or otherwise, all as they shall deem necessary
or expedient;
(c) OWNERSHIP POWERS. To vote or give assent, or exercise any
and all other rights, powers and privileges of ownership with respect
to. and to perform any and all duties and obligations as owners of, any
Securities or other property forming part of the Trust Property, the
same as any individual might do; to exercise powers and rights of
subscription or otherwise which in any manner arise out of ownership of
Securities, and to receive powers of attorney from, and to execute and
deliver proxies or powers of attorney to, such Person or Persons as the
Trustees shall deem proper, re-
EX-1 12th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 12th
-7-
ceiving from or granting to such Person or Persons such power and
discretion with relation to Securities or other property of the Trust,
all as the Trustees shall deem proper;
(d) FORM OF HOLDING. To hold any Security or other property in
a form not indicating any trust, whether in bearer, unregistered or
other negotiable form, or in the name of the Trustees or of the Trust,
or of the Portfolio to which such Securities or property belong, or in
the name of a Custodian, subcustodian or other nominee or nominees, or
otherwise, upon such terms, in such manner or with such powers, as the
Trustees may determine, and with or without indicating any trust or the
interest of the Trustees therein;
(e) REORGANIZATION, ETC. To consent to or participate in any
plan for the reorganization, consolidation or merger of any corporation
or issuer, any Security of which is or was held in the Trust or any
Portfolio; to consent to any contract, lease, mortgage, purchase or
sale of property by such corporation or issuer, and to pay calls or
subscriptions with respect to any Security forming part of the Trust
Property;
(f) VOTING TRUSTS, ETC. To join with other holders of any
Securities in acting through a committee, depository, voting trustee or
otherwise, and in that connection to deposit any Security with, or
transfer any Security to, any such committee, depository or trustee,
and to delegate to them such power and authority with relation to any
Security (whether or not so deposited or transferred) as the Trustees
shall deem proper, and to agree to pay, and to pay, such portion of the
expenses and compensation of such committee, depository or trustee as
the Trustees shall deem proper;
(g) CONTRACTS, ETC. To enter into, make and perform all such
obligations, contracts, agreements and undertakings of every kind and
description, with any Person or Persons, as the Trustees shall in their
discretion deem expedient in the conduct of the business of the Trust,
for such terms as they shall see fit, whether or not extending beyond
the term of office of the Trustees, or beyond the possible expiration
of the Trust, to amend, extend, release or cancel any such obligations,
contracts, agreements or understandings, and to execute, acknowledge,
deliver and record all written instruments which they may deem
necessary or expedient in the exercise of their powers;
(h) GUARANTEES, ETC. To endorse or guarantee the payment of
any notes or other obligations of any Person, to make contracts of
guaranty or suretyship, or otherwise assume liability for payment
thereof; and to mortgage and pledge the Trust Property or any part
thereof to secure any of or all such obligations;
(i) PARTNERSHIPS, ETC. To enter into joint ventures, general
or limited partnerships and any other combinations or associations;
POWERS OF THE TRUSTEES
SECTION 3.1 POWERS IN GENERAL. The Trustees shall have, without other
or further authorization, full, entire, exclusive and absolute power, control
and authority over, and management of, the business of the Trust and over the
Trust Property, to the same extent as if the Trustees were the sole owners of
the business and property of the Trust in their own right, and with such powers
of delegation as may be permitted by this Declaration, subject only to such
limitations as may be expressly imposed by this Declaration of Trust or by
applicable law. The enumeration of any specific power or authority herein shall
not be construed as limiting
EX-1 11th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 11th
-6-
the aforesaid power or authority or any specific power or authority. Without
limiting the foregoing, the Trustees may adopt Bylaws not inconsistent with this
Declaration of Trust providing for the conduct of the business and affairs of
the Trust and may amend and repeal them to the extent that such Bylaws do not
reserve that right to the Shareholders; they may select, and from time to time
change, the fiscal year of the Trust; they may adopt and use a seal for the
Trust, PROVIDED, that unless otherwise required by the Trustees, it shall not be
necessary to place the seal upon, and its absence shall not impair the validity
of, any document, instrument or other paper executed and delivered by or on
behalf of the Trust; they may from time to time in accordance with the
provisions of Section 6.1 hereof establish one or more Portfolios to which they
may allocate such of the Trust Property, subject to such liabilities, as they
shall deem appropriate, each such Portfolio to be operated by the Trustees as a
separate and distinct investment medium and with separately defined investment
objectives and policies and distinct investment purposes, all as established by
the Trustees, or from time to time changed by them; they may as they consider
appropriate elect and remove officers and appoint and terminate agents and
consultants and hire and terminate employees, any one or more of the foregoing
of whom may be a Trustee; they may appoint from their own number, and terminate,
any one or more committees consisting of one or more Trustees, including without
implied limitation an Executive Committee, which may, when the Trustees are not
in session and subject to the 1940 Act, exercise some or all of the power and
authority of the Trustees as the Trustees may determine; in accordance with
Section 5.2 they may employ one or more Investment Advisers, Administrators and
Custodians and may authorize any Custodian to employ sub-custodians or agents
and to deposit all or any part of such assets in a system or systems for the
central handling of Securities, retain Transfer, Dividend Disbursing, Accounting
or Shareholder Servicing Agents or any of the foregoing, provide for the
distribution of Shares by the Trust through one or more Distributors, Principal
Underwriters or otherwise, set record dates or times for the determination of
Shareholders entitled to participate in, benefit from or act with respect to
various matters; and in general they may delegate to any officer of the Trust,
to any Committee of the Trustees and to any employee, Investment Adviser,
Administrator, Distributor, Custodian, Transfer Agent, Dividend Disbursing
Agent, or any other agent or consultant of the Trust, such authority, powers,
functions and duties as they consider desirable or appropriate for the conduct
of the business and affairs of the Trust, including without implied limitation
the power and authority to act in the name of the Trust and of the Trustees, to
sign documents and to act as attorney-in-fact for the Trustees Without limiting
the foregoing and to the extent not inconsistent with the 1940 Act or other
applicable law, the Trustees shall have power and authority:
(a) INVESTMENTS. To invest and reinvest cash and other
property; to buy, for cash or on margin, and otherwise acquire and
hold, Securities created or issued by any Persons, including Securities
maturing after the possible termination of the Trust; to make payment
therefor in any lawful manner in exchange for any of the Trust
Property; and to hold cash or other property uninvested without in any
event being bound or limited by any present or future law or custom in
regard to investments by trustees;
(b) DISPOSITION OF ASSETS. To lend, sell, exchange, mortgage,
pledge, hypothecate, grant security interests in, encumber, negotiate,
convey. transfer or otherwise dispose of, and to trade in, any and all
of the Trust Property, free and clear of all trusts, for cash or on
terms, with or without advertisement, and on such terms and conditions
as to payment, security or otherwise, all as they shall deem necessary
or expedient;
(c) OWNERSHIP POWERS. To vote or give assent, or exercise any
and all other rights, powers and privileges of ownership with respect
to. and to perform any and all duties and obligations as owners of, any
Securities or other property forming part of the Trust Property, the
same as any individual might do; to exercise powers and rights of
subscription or otherwise which in any manner arise out of ownership of
Securities, and to receive powers of attorney from, and to execute and
deliver proxies or powers of attorney to, such Person or Persons as the
Trustees shall deem proper, re-
EX-1 12th Page of 34 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 12th
-7-
ceiving from or granting to such Person or Persons such power and
discretion with relation to Securities or other property of the Trust,
all as the Trustees shall deem proper;
(d) FORM OF HOLDING. To hold any Security or other property in
a form not indicating any trust, whether in bearer, unregistered or
other negotiable form, or in the name of the Trustees or of the Trust,
or of the Portfolio to which such Securities or property belong, or in
the name of a Custodian, subcustodian or other nominee or nominees, or
otherwise, upon such terms, in such manner or with such powers, as the
Trustees may determine, and with or without indicating any trust or the
interest of the Trustees therein;
(e) REORGANIZATION, ETC. To consent to or participate in any
plan for the reorganization, consolidation or merger of any corporation
or issuer, any Security of which is or was held in the Trust or any
Portfolio; to consent to any contract, lease, mortgage, purchase or
sale of property by such corporation or issuer, and to pay calls or
subscriptions with respect to any Security forming part of the Trust
Property;
(f) VOTING TRUSTS, ETC. To join with other holders of any
Securities in acting through a committee, depository, voting trustee or
otherwise, and in that connection to deposit any Security with, or
transfer any Security to, any such committee, depository or trustee,
and to delegate to them such power and authority with relation to any
Security (whether or not so deposited or transferred) as the Trustees
shall deem proper, and to agree to pay, and to pay, such portion of the
expenses and compensation of such committee, depository or trustee as
the Trustees shall deem proper;
(g) CONTRACTS, ETC. To enter into, make and perform all such
obligations, contracts, agreements and undertakings of every kind and
description, with any Person or Persons, as the Trustees shall in their
discretion deem expedient in the conduct of the business of the Trust,
for such terms as they shall see fit, whether or not extending beyond
the term of office of the Trustees, or beyond the possible expiration
of the Trust, to amend, extend, release or cancel any such obligations,
contracts, agreements or understandings, and to execute, acknowledge,
deliver and record all written instruments which they may deem
necessary or expedient in the exercise of their powers;
(h) GUARANTEES, ETC. To endorse or guarantee the payment of
any notes or other obligations of any Person, to make contracts of
guaranty or suretyship, or otherwise assume liability for payment
thereof; and to mortgage and pledge the Trust Property or any part
thereof to secure any of or all such obligations;
(i) PARTNERSHIPS, ETC. To enter into joint ventures, general
or limited partnerships and any other combinations or associations;
FLORIDA SUNLIFE/NORWEGIAN OIL AND GAS
PENSION ESTATE FRAUD
1ST MORTGAGE FRAUD BC/ ALBERTA/FLORIDA
IMPERIAL CROWN TAX SHELTER
CIBC DEADMAN PONZIE
PENSION ESTATE FRAUD
1ST MORTGAGE FRAUD BC/ ALBERTA/FLORIDA
IMPERIAL CROWN TAX SHELTER
CIBC DEADMAN PONZIE
BIG EMBEZZLEMENT DIVORCE FRAUD
At an unrelated hearing in a separate matter last week, Anthony Rondolino, a state-court judge in St. Petersburg, Fla., said that an affidavit submitted by the David Stern law firm on behalf of GMAC Mortgage LLC in a foreclosure case wasn't necessarily sufficient to establish that GMAC was the owner of the mortgage.
"I don't have any confidence that any of the documents the Court's receiving on these mass foreclosures are valid," the judge said at the hearing. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303491304575188943977777722.html
Freehold Royalty Trust Acquires Petrovera Resources Amount: 354.0B
Freehold Royalty Trust completed the $354 million acquisition of Petrovera Resources from Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
Date Closed: May 10 2005 Published in Magazine: Sep 01 2005 ADVERTISEMENTOn May 10, 2005, Freehold Royalty Trust completed the $354 million acquisition of Petrovera Resources from Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. In connection with the acquisition, Freehold Royalty Trust raised approximately $210 million by way of a bought deal short form prospectus offering of subscription receipts, approximately $60 million by way of a private placement of trust units, and arranged a $165 million credit facility with CIBC as agent and CIBC and RBC as lenders.
Freehold Royalty Trust was represented on the acquisition by Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP (BD&P) with a team that included Harry Campbell, Q.C., John Cuthbertson and Alicia Quesnel (commercial), David Ross (tax), Stuart Money, Carolyn Wright, Amanda Harris, Danielle Parrotta and Jason Bilinsky (due diligence), and Jody Wivcharuk (competition).
Canadian Natural Resources was represented on the acquisition by Bennett Jones LLP with a team that included Robert Desbarats and Janice Buckingham (commercial), Chip Johnston (securities) and Jo’Anne Strekaf (competition), and by John Brussa (tax) of BD&P.
In connection with the equity offering, Freehold Royalty Trust was represented by BD&P with a team that included Grant Zawalsky, Brent Herman and Grant MacKenzie. Underwriters for the subscription receipt offering included CIBC World Markets Inc., RBC Dominion Securities Inc., BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., Scotia Capital Inc. and TD Securities Inc. The underwriters were represented by Macleod Dixon LLP with a team that included Kevin Johnson, Kirk Litvenenko and Mark Gerlitz.
In connection with the credit facility, Freehold Royalty Trust was represented by Margot Langdon of BD&P. CIBC was represented by Kevin Fougere of Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP. Lawyers Harry S. Campbell John H. Cuthbertson Alicia K. Quesnel David W. Ross Stuart Money Carolyn A. Wright Amanda B. Harris Danielle Parrotta Jason R. Bilinsky Jody L. Wivcharuk Robert P. Desbarats Janice Buckingham Chip Johnston Jo'Anne Strekaf John A. Brussa Grant A. Zawalsky Brent T. Herman Grant A. MacKenzie Kevin E. Johnson Kirk A. Litvenenko Mark R. Gerlitz Margot D. Langdon Kevin Fougere Law Firms Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP (Calgary, AB) Bennett Jones LLP (Calgary, AB) Macleod Dixon LLP (Calgary, AB) Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Toronto, ON) Financial Intermediaries Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Toronto, ON) Royal Bank of Canada (Toronto, ON) CIBC World Markets Inc. (Toronto, ON) RBC Dominion Securities Inc. (Toronto, ON) BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. - Lgl. Dept. (Toronto, ON) Scotia Capital Inc. (Toronto, ON) TD Securities Inc. (Toronto, ON) Legal Parties Ministry of Economic Development Trade & Tourism (ON) (Toronto, ON) Canadian Natural Resources Limited (Calgary, AB) Lawyers who are also ranked in the Lexpert Directory are displayed in green.
in the annals of CANADIAN JUNK BOND justice
unbelievable contempt of the BC SUPREMEC COURT
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY
KENDAX INVESTMENTS INC.
Applicant AND
DONALD CARMICHAEL AND 658051 ONTARIO LIMITED
Respondents
JUDICIAL TRUSTEE’S FIRST REPORT TO THE OWNERS OF CONDOMINIUM PLAN 8811686, UNITS 1 – 195, 205 HERITAGE DRIVE SE, CALGARY, AB (BONAVENTURE COURT) (the “Properties”)
Alger & Associates Inc. (“Alger”), has been appointed Judicial Trustee in accordance with various Orders made by the Honorable Justice R.M. Cairns of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta made during December 2002 through February 2003. The purpose of this report is to inform the owners of the Properties of our appointment, those actions undertaken by us to date and of other relevant information.
1. 1. Change of Title to Your Unit
658051 Ontario Limited, which holds a title to the Properties in trust, is currently not a legally subsisting corporation, having been struck from the Ontario Registry of Corporations in 1995. If 658051 Ontario Limited does not regain its legal status by February 28, 2003, then title to units will automatically be transferred to a nominee corporation wholly controlled by the Judicial Trustee.
CEASE AND DESIST=ESTATE FRAUD/TRUSTEE FRAUD /
Freehold Royalty Trust Acquires Petrovera Resources Amount: 354.0B
Financial Intermediaries Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Toronto, ON)
Royal Bank of Canada (Toronto, ON) CIBC World Markets Inc. (Toronto, ON) RBC Dominion Securities Inc. (Toronto, ON) BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. - Lgl. Dept. (Toronto, ON) Scotia Capital Inc. (Toronto, ON) TD Securities Inc. (Toronto, ON) Legal Parties Ministry of Economic Development Trade & Tourism (ON) (Toronto, ON) Canadian Natural Resources Limited (Calgary, AB)
Ministry of Economic Development Trade & Tourism (ON) (Toronto, ON)
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (Calgary, AB)
It was with Ivan Boesky, the Wall Street arbitrageur, who had admitted using stolen information to make over a $100 million.
1986,
In December 1986, U.S. Attorney Rudolph Giuliani made one of the most extraordinary deals in the annals of American justice. It was with Ivan Boesky, the Wall Street arbitrageur, who had admitted using stolen information to make over a $100 million. Not only was he was allowed to plead guilty to a only a single count of securities violations, but he was permitted to keep secret his foreign bank and brokerage accounts, even if they had been enriched by his criminal activity. Similarly, the accounts in his wife and children's name were protected. This accord was not Giuliani's work alone: it was initialed by the U.S. Attorneys in both Washington D.C. and Los Angeles. What Boesky offered to give in return for this leniency was, among other things, information about the secret dealings of a reclusive financier in Los Angeles-- Michael Robert Milken.
Even as Giuliani hammered out the final terms of this bargain with Boesky, Milken, on the telephone in his trading room in Beverly Hills, was lining up some $20 billion in financing for raids on such corporate behemoths as US Steel, Gillette, and Trans World Corporation. Despite the scope of his operations, he had tried to remain invisible to the world at large by denying all press interviews, avoiding social functions and buying up photographs of himself
In December 1986, U.S. Attorney Rudolph Giuliani made one of the most extraordinary deals in the annals of American justice. It was with Ivan Boesky, the Wall Street arbitrageur, who had admitted using stolen information to make over a $100 million. Not only was he was allowed to plead guilty to a only a single count of securities violations, but he was permitted to keep secret his foreign bank and brokerage accounts, even if they had been enriched by his criminal activity. Similarly, the accounts in his wife and children's name were protected. This accord was not Giuliani's work alone: it was initialed by the U.S. Attorneys in both Washington D.C. and Los Angeles. What Boesky offered to give in return for this leniency was, among other things, information about the secret dealings of a reclusive financier in Los Angeles-- Michael Robert Milken.
Even as Giuliani hammered out the final terms of this bargain with Boesky, Milken, on the telephone in his trading room in Beverly Hills, was lining up some $20 billion in financing for raids on such corporate behemoths as US Steel, Gillette, and Trans World Corporation. Despite the scope of his operations, he had tried to remain invisible to the world at large by denying all press interviews, avoiding social functions and buying up photographs of himself
American utopia governed by English "common law," a utopia in which every citizen was a "sovereign,"
Sovereign citizen ideology justifies these goals by claiming that at one time there was an American utopia governed by English "common law," a utopia in which every citizen was a "sovereign," and there were no oppressive laws, taxes, regulations or court orders.
SOVEREIGN DEEDS OF TRUST " CROWN English "common law," catastrophe
UNRAVELLING A 20 YEARS OF INDUSTRY CANADA- CRA -CROWN PROSECUTOR MASTERMINDED
"I don't have any confidence that any of the documents the Court's receiving on these ALBERTA mass foreclosures ,in joint names, attached to this marriage certificate are valid"
ESTATE SOVEREIGN VICTIMS
LIVES ARE CONTROLLED FINANCIALLY BY CROWN SOVEREIGN CITIZEN CREDITORS
ILLEGAL FLORIDA 'DEADMAN'S " JOINT ESTATE IS FINANCIALLY AND EMOTIONALLY CONTROLLING VICTIMS LIVES
VICTIM INSURED AS CORPORATE= CORPORATE DEAD PEASANT BY THE CROWN AND VICTIMS EX'S IN COLLUSION CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD DEBTOR/VICTIM.
However, sovereign citizens have a number of other weapons at their disposal. Many have engaged in a variety of frauds and scams, often targeting people with similar ideological beliefs in what might be called affinity fraud. A few of these schemes, most notably those perpetrated by the Colorado-based We the People and the Florida-based Greater Ministries International in the 1990s, took in millions of dollars. http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/SCM.asp?xpicked=4
SOVEREIGN DEEDS OF TRUST " CROWN English "common law," catastrophe
UNRAVELLING A 20 YEARS OF INDUSTRY CANADA- CRA -CROWN PROSECUTOR MASTERMINDED
"I don't have any confidence that any of the documents the Court's receiving on these ALBERTA mass foreclosures ,in joint names, attached to this marriage certificate are valid"
ESTATE SOVEREIGN VICTIMS
LIVES ARE CONTROLLED FINANCIALLY BY CROWN SOVEREIGN CITIZEN CREDITORS
ILLEGAL FLORIDA 'DEADMAN'S " JOINT ESTATE IS FINANCIALLY AND EMOTIONALLY CONTROLLING VICTIMS LIVES
VICTIM INSURED AS CORPORATE= CORPORATE DEAD PEASANT BY THE CROWN AND VICTIMS EX'S IN COLLUSION CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD DEBTOR/VICTIM.
However, sovereign citizens have a number of other weapons at their disposal. Many have engaged in a variety of frauds and scams, often targeting people with similar ideological beliefs in what might be called affinity fraud. A few of these schemes, most notably those perpetrated by the Colorado-based We the People and the Florida-based Greater Ministries International in the 1990s, took in millions of dollars. http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/SCM.asp?xpicked=4
COURTS NEED TO QUIT PROTECTING SOVEREIGN CRIMINAL CREDITORS
The purpose of this web site is to provide access to SOVEREIGN ILLEGAL Orders, reports and documents to various SOVEREIGN interested PONZIE parties. Contact: David Lewis, Michael Costello, or Bruce Alger
Risk management for accounting is an approach a company will take when preparing financial information. Almost all business activities carry come level of risk; companies will need to institute principles to avoid taking excessive risk that may damage the company financially. Some of the best tips for this process include taking a conservative approach to recording financial information, avoiding the use of debt for purchasing assets and creating a secure environment for financial information. This approach helps companies complete a risk management for accounting analysis and reduce the potential for major business disruption.
It's very sad - the developers discovered Thursday that their partners in the interchange, Len Barrie and Bear Mountain Master Partnership, have gone into court-ordered creditor protection.
ALL THIS COURT ACTION BASED ON MORTGAGE /DEED /OWNERSHIP FRAUD
SAME SOVEREIGN INVESTOR ENTERPRISE =“(Burke’s) very clear about wanting to leave the criminal portion of the investigation in the hands of police, but he had concerns that fraud has happened and had concerns that he was victimized by fraud,” said McLaughlin. “He approached the commercial crimes section and they immediately started a criminal investigation.”
US AND CANADIAN sovereign citizens IN COLLUSION WITH CROWN imperial sovereign prosecutors :legal aid lawyers have taken over Canadain courts, court registries,land titles registries
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY CORRESPONDENCE TO MADAM JUSTICE HORNER DIRECTLY - At the July 28, 2005 Court Application (continued)
Because of MADAM JUSTICE HORNER let a sovereign WELFARE CLAIMENT/CREDITOR sign as Judge, ,
Ordinary heroes risking their lives to save others
two family members and at least 3 friends are dead.
Someone silenced my Dad because he was making many in Government nervous .
Why were they nervous? because they were running a ponzie using his son in laws name and #sin
Cronies and sovereign citizens kill !
Cowards cover it up !
The PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA must explain HIS MINISTERS TREASONOUS ACTS.
How did a BC child support order ,UNDER ASSIGNMENT TO THE QUEEN turn into a forged Florida Deadmans BONNAVENTURE estate?
CAMPBELL RIVER CITY HALL has been hiding FBI PONZIE WANTED CRIMINALS who masterminded this affinity fraud .BC ,ALBERTA,ONTARIO PROVINCIAL ATTORNEY GENERAL MINISTRY KNEW IT WAS AN ILLEGAL DOUBLE FUNDING FRAUD BUT KEPT THE MONEY FLOWING .
SHELL COMPANIES CREATED UNDER VICTIMS NAME ATTACHED TO BC LAND
SEND ALL MONIES TO THE TRUST Kendax Investments Inc. vs. Donald Carmichael and 658051 Ontario Limited and Kingscroft Investments Limited
100% ALBERTA DELUSION- IT'S ALL FORGERY-15 TRUSTEE REPORTS OF ESTATE BANKRUPTCY ,FORECLOSURE,RESTRUCTING FRAUD
SOVEREIGN ISSUE.
If any JOE PLUMMER oath taker committed these crimes they’d be looking at restitution fines plus jail time. I fervently hope the OFFICERS OF THE QUEENS COURT can expect no less a verdict from our justice system.
A DEBTOR/ employee's personal life just doesn't turn off during business hours. ... if an illness or accident OR identity theft happens, it can financially devastate their lives. ....
Why is the Harper goverment aiding and abetting Paper terrorism ?
Why did the Prime Minister of Canada allow his cousin the ALBERTA JUDGE to lend her name to the sovereign court WELFARE QUEEN clerks :EX WIFE AND EX GIRLFRIEND ?
I will never forget nor forgive such acts of treason and greed.
Big Banks, Big Oil, Big Corp ,Big Investor ponzie Greed thanks to BIG EGO EX'S .
How do SOVEREIGNS sleep at night ?
Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies. "
"It's something that will impact their world assumptions, their view of life, their feeling that the world is basically safe and that human beings are good," said Tine Jensen, a child psychologist at the Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies. "They will never forget."
Jensen points to the massive vigils, memorials and stories of ordinary heroes risking their lives to save others as positive lessons, strengthening the national unity of young Norwegians, who have responded with solidarity and defiance.
"You can't change the event, but you can try to counteract it in the aftermath," Jensen said. "When we see how Norway has responded, with flowers and people helping each other, it may actually end up enhancing the sense of cohesiveness and humanity."http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-norway-youth-20110728,0,4506045.story
VOID THIS BC MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE
JACQUELINE GAUDET -LEGAL AID FRAUD
29MAY02
A TRANS NATIONAL ESTATE SECURITIES CRIME IN PROGRESS
THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA and her heirs , successors and assigns just keep racking up the forged costs to the " forged Florida Deadmans BONNAVENTURE estate" ATTACHED TO THE LIVING VICTIM 'S ESTATE IN BC.
Orders of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta ("Court")
please send all correspondence to the ex wife OR EX GIRLFRIEND who appears to be signing as JUSTICE HORNER.
Bonaventure ALBERTA IMPERIAL SOVEREIGN INVESTORS Country Club in foreclosure
ex wife's/ex girlfriend financial criminal stalking
Kendax Investments Inc. vs. Donald Carmichael and 658051 Ontario Limited and Kingscroft Investments Limited Alger & Associates Inc. has been appointed Judicial Trustee of the property known as Bonaventure Court (municipally known as 205 Heritage Drive, Calgary, AB and registered as Condo Plan 8811686, Units 1 - 195) in accordance with Orders of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta ("Court") as posted below. As Judicial Trustee, we are a neutral party whose duties are outlined in the Judicial Trustee's First Report (February 20, 2003) as posted below. Recent Events
Briefs
Notices
Affidavits (Selected requested items only)
Financial Statements
Statement of Claim & Defence - Kendax Litigation
Other
Doral Golf Resort lands in bankruptcy court South Florida
Since its inception in 1997, Capital Trust has established itself as a leader in the field of commercial real estate finance. Capital Trust has one of the deepest and most experienced investment management teams in the sector, led by Stephen D. Plavin (CEO), Geoffrey G. Jervis (CFO) and Thomas C. Ruffing (COO).
Kendax Investments Inc. vs. Donald Carmichael and 658051 Ontario Limited and Kingscroft Investments Limited Alger & Associates Inc. has been appointed Judicial Trustee of the property known as Bonaventure Court (municipally known as 205 Heritage Drive, Calgary, AB and registered as Condo Plan 8811686, Units 1 - 195) in accordance with Orders of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta ("Court") as posted below. As Judicial Trustee, we are a neutral party whose duties are outlined in the Judicial Trustee's First Report (February 20, 2003) as posted below. Recent Events
- PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY CORRESPONDENCE TO MADAM JUSTICE HORNER DIRECTLY - At the July 28, 2005 Court Application (continued)
- The matters heard at the May 12, 2011 Court Application as outlined below, were adjourned to July 28, 2011 at 10AM as noted within the letters contained in the Notices section below. The related briefs for this application are posted below.
- On March 24, 2011, the Court granted an Order approving all items outlined in the Judicial Trustee's December 15, 2010 Notice of Application with the exception of the application of set-off to retain approximately $1.7 million against Respondents and the interim distribution, which matters were adjourned sine die. A copy of the Order is posted below. The application on the adjourned matters is to be heard on May 12, 2011 at 10AM. The brief and affidavit filed by Glenmount Management Ltd. and the brief filed by the Judicial Trustee are all posted below.
- The Judicial Trustee has mailed a 2010 income tax reporting letter to Beneficial Owners. A copy of the Income Tax Reporting Letter is posted below under the Other section.
- On July 23, 2010 Kendax Investments Inc. ("Kendax") filed a Statement of Defence to the Judicial Trustee's June 17, 2010 Statement of Claim against them, along with the related Demand for Particulars. On August 16, 2010, the Judicial Trustee filed its Reply to Demand for Particulars. On September 7, 2010 the Court added Bonaventure Small Investors Group ("BSIG") as an Intervener to this action. On September 30, 2010 the Judicial Trustee executed its Affidavit of Records. On May 3, 2011 Kendax executed its Affidavit of Records. On May 9, 2011 Kendax filed an application and affidavit in support of seeking an Order for security for costs against BSIG, with the matter to be heard in conjunction with the May 12, 2011 application referred to above. All of the aforementioned documents are posted below under "Statement of Claim & Defence - Kendax litigation" tab.
- Fourth Special Report to Beneficial Owners - November 1, 2010
Fourth Special Report - November 1, 2010
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Appendix 6
Appendix 7
Appendix 8
Appendix 9
Appendix 10A
Appendix 10B
Appendix 10C
Appendix 10D
Appendix 10E
Appendix 10F
Appendix 10G
Appendix 10H
Appendix 10I
Appendix 10J
Appendix 10K
Appendix 10L
Appendix 10M
Appendix 10N
Appendix 10O
Appendix 10P
Appendix 10Q
Appendix 10R
Appendix 11
Appendix 12
Appendix 13
Appendix 14
Appendix 15
Appendix 16
Appendix 17
Appendix 18
Appendix 19
Appendix 20
Appendix 21
Appendix 22
Appendix 23
Appendix 24
Appendix 25
Appendix 26
Appendix 27
Appendix 28
Appendix 29
Appendix 30
Appendix 31
Appendix 32
Appendix 33
Appendix 34
Appendix 35
- Third Special Report to Beneficial Owners - June 15, 2009
Third Special Report to Beneficial Owners - June 15, 2009
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Appendix 6
Appendix 7
Appendix 8
Appendix 9
Appendix 10
Appendix 11
Appendix 12
Appendix 13
Appendix 14
Appendix 15
Appendix 16
Briefs
Notices
Affidavits (Selected requested items only)
- Supplemental Affidavit of Trevor Joyal - June 14, 2011
- Affidavit of Trevor Joyal - April 14, 2011
- Affidavit of Michael Costello - December 7, 2010
- Affidavit of Donald Carmichael - June 9, 2010
- Affidavit of Michael Costello - March 2, 2010
- Affidavit of Bruce Alger - February 26, 2010
- Joyce Kendall Affidavit - October 30, 2009
- Exhibit A
- Exhibit B
- Exhibit C
- Exhibit D
- Exhibit E
- Exhibit F
- Exhibit G
- Exhibit H
- Exhibit I
- Exhibit J1
- Exhibit J2
- Exhibit J3
- Exhibit J4
- Exhibit J5
- Exhibit J6
- Exhibit J7
- Exhibit J8
- Exhibit J9
- Exhibit K
- Exhibit L1
- Exhibit L2
- Exhibit L3
- Exhibit L4
- Exhibit L5
- Exhibit L6
- Exhibit L7
- Exhibit L8
- Exhibit L9
- Exhibit L10
- Exhibit L11
- Exhibit L12
- Exhibit L13
- Exhibit L14
- Exhibit L15
- Exhibit L16
- Exhibit L17
- Exhibit L18
- Exhibit L19
- Exhibit L20
- Exhibit M
- Exhibit N
- Exhibit O
- Exhibit P
- Exhibit Q
- Exhibit R
- Exhibit S
- Exhibit T
- Exhibit A
- Donald Carmichael Affidavit - October 30, 2009
- Exhibit 1 - Bonaventure Court Identification of Parties
- Exhibit 2 - Appliance Purchase Agreement
- Exhibit 3 - Rental Management and Guarantees Agreement
- Exhibit 4 - Financial Services Agreement
- Exhibit 5 - Co-Owners Agreement
- Exhibit 6 - Letter of Understanding
- Exhibit 7 - Letter of Understanding
- Exhibit 8 - Item #11
- Exhibit 9 - Owner Transactions 205 Heritage Drive SE
- Exhibit 10 - Item 14
- Exhibit 11 - Email with Joyce Kendall
- Exhibit 12 - Mortgage 658051 Ontario Limited
- Exhibit 13 - Item 17
- Exhibit 14 - Final Statement of Adjustments
- Exhibit 15 - Item 18
- Exhibit 16 - Item 19
- Exhibit 17 - Item 20
- Exhibit 18 - Annual Mortgage Account Statement
- Exhibit 19 - Item 25
- Exhibit 20 - Item 27
- Exhibit 21 - Outstanding Legal Accounts Letter
- Exhibit 22 - Item 46
- Exhibit 23
- Exhibit 1 - Bonaventure Court Identification of Parties
- Linda Dixon Affidavit - October 7, 2009
- Bruce Alger Affidavit - August 31, 2009
- Linda Dixon Affidavit - July 15, 2009 (filed August 11, 2009)
- Bruce Alger Affidavit - May 19, 2006
- Linda Dixon Affidavit - May 8, 2006
- Joyce Kendall Affidavit - Aug 12, 2005
- Affidavit of Donald Carmichael - July 22, 2005
Exhibits from Affidavit of Donald Carmichael - July 22, 2005
- Affidavit of Linda Dixon - April 26, 2005
- Affidavit re: Bonaventure Small Investors Group - April 19, 2005
- Affidavit of Joyce Kendall re: Settlement Discussions - June 3, 2004
- Affidavit of Bruce Alger re: matters for December 12 Court Application - December 4, 2003
- Michael Costello Affidavit - June 24, 2003
- Affidavit of Joyce Kendall - August 7, 2002 (Body only)
Financial Statements
Statement of Claim & Defence - Kendax Litigation
Other
Doral Golf Resort lands in bankruptcy court South Florida
Since its inception in 1997, Capital Trust has established itself as a leader in the field of commercial real estate finance. Capital Trust has one of the deepest and most experienced investment management teams in the sector, led by Stephen D. Plavin (CEO), Geoffrey G. Jervis (CFO) and Thomas C. Ruffing (COO).
Related News Commercial mortgage-backed securities lenders on the Doral Golf Resort & SpaDoral Golf Resort & Spa Latest from The Business Journals Doral Golf Resort in bankruptcy saleGolf plans Doral championshipsCNL Hotels reports revenue increase for 2Q Follow this company can expect some bankruptcy court negotiations after the home of the famed Blue Monster course filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy court protection.
The senior debt on the Doral Golf Resort is a $967.2 million commercial CMBS loan that includes four other KSL Hotel properties. The portion of the mortgage that applies specifically to the Doral property is $98.5 million.
ESTATE EASY TARGETS
Pretty easy to become a estate target when your GOVERMENT sovereign insiders declares VICTIM DEBTOR paper dead with an estate commercial mortgage debt of $ 98.5 million.
OVER INSURED IDENTITY THEFT ESTATE VICTIM- CROWN MASTERMINDED ESTATE SOVEREIGN PONZIE VICTIMS
GOVERNMENT LIFE- INSURED CORPORATE CASH FLOW ENTITY/CORPORATION/DECEASED DEBT OBLIGATIONS HELD IN TRUST IN FLORIDA
Capital Trust, Inc. is a finance and investment management company focused on the commercial real estate industry. Capital Trust's professionals combine extensive real estate experience and capital markets expertise with a broad network of relationships to originate, underwrite, structure, close and manage real estate-related debt and other investments.
Capital Trust is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "CT" and is headquartered in New York City. The company is organized as a real estate investment trust (REIT)
Its headquarters is based, Doral, Florida.The new ownership group called CNL-AB LLC—a joint venture of Paulson & Co., Winthrop Realty Trust and Capital Trust Inc.—officially acquired the resorts and three others last week through a foreclosure proceeding, GlobeSt.com reports. The joint venture says the bankruptcy filings are an attempt “to further restructure the company's debt at the property level and to improve operations during a time of recovering fundamentals in the hospitality industry.” The filings effectively eliminate about US$800 million of debt and preferred equity.
MYSTERY Privately Held company in the Manufacturing industry.
NORWEGIAN ?
CANADIAN ?
AMERICAN?
ENGLAND ?
Doral Golf Resort lands in bankruptcy court South Florida Business Journal - by Kevin Gale Date: Wednesday, February 2, 2011, 8:51am EST - Last Modified: Wednesday, February 2, 2011, 9:11am EST Related:Commercial Real Estate, Bankruptcies Enlarge Image
Our task is to understand and deliver a more effective response to the new reality of far right politics. Dr Matthew Goodwin of Nottingham University is an expert in extremism and author of New British Fascism.
SOVEREIGN FLORIDA/SW CALGARY TRUST OWNER
JOYCE A KENDALL-PURCHASER OF A PONZIE ENTERPRISE
New British Fascism. -THE UK QUEENS CANADIAN CROWN AND OFFICERS OF HER COURT
REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE FEDERAL ALBERTA BC ONTARIO MONTREAL GOVERNMENT/CRA IN-HOUSE FRAUD
FORGED FLORIDA DEADMAN 'S ESTATE ATTACHED TO A FORGED BC MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE TRANSFERRED TO A NORWEGIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANY
TRUSTEE
Contact: Bruce Alger, David Lewis
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, MINISTRY OF REVENUE LEGAL SERVICES BRANCH
WEST COAST CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
MAXIMUS/MERS/CROWN TARGETED ESTATES
CROWN SOVERIEGN LEGAL ABUSE/EXTORATION
~
$ 44 MILLION TRANSACTION SEIZED BY/US GOVERNMENT RETURNED TO SOVEREIGN BY WAY OF EXTORATION /CONTEMPT/ PERJURY
"Only the Canadian government can re-establish the necessary and appropriate level of judicial and support resources."
The 50 state attorneys general are conducting a foreclosure industry probe. So are state and federal regulators. Class-action lawsuits are gathering force, and, with increasing frequency, state judges are tossing out foreclosure suits in favor of homeowners. The developments are prolonging the housing market depression, casting doubt on mortgage ownership and calling into question whether mortgage-backed securities are, in fact, backed by nothing at all.http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=12852757
"The court constantly strives to serve the public interest in the administration of justice in the face of dwindling resources and a burgeoning case load," Brecknell wrote. "Only government can re-establish the necessary and appropriate level of judicial and support resources."
sovereign island mentality
Wellard was charged with shooting a boy's puppy on Quadra Island, B.C., in September 2008. A series of court delays resulted in the charges being dropped in February this year.
Attorney General Barry Penner didn't return a request for an interview.http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/07/25/bc-court-crisis.html
PBCT PEOPLE- US/CANADIANVG SOVEREIGN PAPER TERRORISTS
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
TESTIMONY OF BOND PONZIE QUEEN-UNREFORMABLE AND DANGEROUS THREAT TO SOCIETY
KEEP HER BEHIND BARS FOR LIFE
property unlawfully taken as a PRIZE
IN 1993-1994 WHILE UNDER ASSIGNMENT TO CAMPBELL RIVER MINISTRY OF SOCIAL SERVICES
RICHARD DEWHURST
FAMILY MAINTENCE WORKER
EMPLOYEE OF THE BC ATTORNEY GENERAL'S MINISTRY-MAXIMUS US INC
HOW DID THIS JAILED US PONZIE SOVEREIGN QUEEN GET THIS CONTRACT REOPENED 14 YEARS LATER WHILE SERVING TIME FOR ATTEMPTING TO HAVE THE JUDGE KILLED FOR TAKING DOWN THE PONZIE IN 1993-94 ?
Ex-Foreclosure Giant David J. Stern Faces Bar Trouble Ex-Foreclosure Giant David J. Stern Faces Bar Trouble June 20, 2011 ... Court of Appeal order in a foreclosure case where his firm represented Sun Trust Bank.www.houselogic.com/news/articles/ex-foreclosure-giant-david-j-stern-faces-bar-trouble
DAVID STERN
BC CANADA MERS
DIVORCE FRAUD
CIBC- SOVEREIGN TRUST MASTERMIND
CHARLES RUFF
ARE THEY REAL DOCTORS OR FAKE ?
JOYCE KENDAL-FAKE
TRANSFERRED PROPERTY TO HER FAKE COMPANY
SOLD UNITS TO THE DOCTORS
DR KALINA
DR HEALY
DR DUKE
WHO IS CIBC’S Mr. Bruce Grant Bonaventure?
Canadian JUNK BOND/CROWN PONZIE dealer –MILKEN/LEHMANN HIDDEN PONZIE
COVER-UP
DESPERATE GOVERMENTS DO DESPERATE THINGS TO COVER UP
WHO IS THE REAL JOYCE KENDALL?
JOYCE KENDALL IS THE QUEEN OF THE 2O YEAR RUN WELFARE /HMS PONZIE
196 ALBERTA CONDO UNITS PURCHASED BY MORTGAGE FRAUD
TITLE ON UNITS /LAND CAN'T PASS BY FRAUD
Faked foreclosure filings by plaintiffs-CROWN AKA THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA
heirs successors and assigns
are all too common
North america landownership due to MERS CRISIS is under attach by sovereign imperial/norwegian oil and gas companies IN COLLUSION WITH INDUSTRY CANADA
discovered that foreclosure plaintiffs-CROWN file false documents all the time.
MERS/MAXIMUS foreclosure/INSURANCE industry/GROUP INVESTORS probe
THIS SOVEREIGN CITIZEN CLERK OF THE COURT MOVEMENT HAS TAKEN OVER NORTH AMERICA COURT REGESTRIES
LAND TITLES OFFICES MERS CORRUPTED =BROKEN CHAIN OF TITLES
heirs successors and assigns
are all too common
North america landownership due to MERS CRISIS is under attach by sovereign imperial/norwegian oil and gas companies IN COLLUSION WITH INDUSTRY CANADA
discovered that foreclosure plaintiffs-CROWN file false documents all the time.
MERS/MAXIMUS foreclosure/INSURANCE industry/GROUP INVESTORS probe
THIS SOVEREIGN CITIZEN CLERK OF THE COURT MOVEMENT HAS TAKEN OVER NORTH AMERICA COURT REGESTRIES
LAND TITLES OFFICES MERS CORRUPTED =BROKEN CHAIN OF TITLES
Matt Weidner points out, these cases underscore a very important lesson for both defendants and their attorneys alike:
- Believe nothing.
- Challenge everything.
- And don’t give up hope.
Congrats to attorney Fisher for a job well done.
Just last week, I was in a hearing before another judge, who told me a bout a case he had just discovered where two different banks tried to foreclose on the same note against the same defendant.
Each plaintiff submitted a sworn affidavit claiming that it owned the note.
Who signed the affidavits for those two banks? The same person – an employee of the plaintiff’s law firm, the Law Office of David J. Stern, P.A.
Obviously, this judge was none too pleased, either. Surely, he’s wondering how many forged documents have slid through in cases that he wasn’t able to spot.
police should make restitution to her in gold.?
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- A Florida woman whose husband and stepson died in a shootout with Arkansas law enforcement officers last year has filed a lawsuit arguing that her loved ones suffered "torture killings" and that West Memphis police should make restitution to her in gold.
Forty-five-year-old Jerry Kane and his 16-year-old son, Joseph, died in West Memphis last May after the teen shot two police officers to death near a highway exit ramp.
The elder Kane considered himself a sovereign citizen, part of a group of U.S. residents who declare themselves above federal and state laws and sometimes don't recognize the court system.
His widow, Donna Lee Wray-Kane, filed her lawsuit in Florida on Tuesday. A federal judge has threatened to throw it out if she doesn't say why she's entitled to damages.
(Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
UNIT PURCHASE AGREEMENTS ARE LOAD WITH INSURANCE FRAUD ATTACHED TO THE VICTIM OF IDENITY OWNERSHIP FRAUD
The attraction of the world's most popular precious metal ,OIL.AND GAS STOCK- along with the possibility of fantastic financial returns and possible tax advantages - "was used to entice investors into placing their money by investing in offshore shell companies CREATED THROUGH FORGED FEDERAL PERSONAL PROPERTY ATTACHMENTS,"
ILLEGAL GOVERMENT PROCURED OWNER OF CHARGE
CANADA PERMANENT TRUST COMPANY -MORTGAGE FRAUD
THE REAL OWNER IN 1974 DENIES THAT THE GOVERMENT HAD A CHARGE AGAINST THE LAND BECAUSE THE PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED WITH CASH IN 1969 BY HIS GRANDFATHER
The attraction of the world's most popular precious metal ,OIL.AND GAS STOCK- along with the possibility of fantastic financial returns and possible tax advantages - "was used to entice investors into placing their money by investing in offshore shell companies CREATED THROUGH FORGED FEDERAL PERSONAL PROPERTY ATTACHMENTS,"
ILLEGAL GOVERMENT PROCURED OWNER OF CHARGE
CANADA PERMANENT TRUST COMPANY -MORTGAGE FRAUD
THE REAL OWNER IN 1974 DENIES THAT THE GOVERMENT HAD A CHARGE AGAINST THE LAND BECAUSE THE PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED WITH CASH IN 1969 BY HIS GRANDFATHER
DIFFERENT AUTHORS=MERS SOVEREIGN JUDGE AKA FLORIDA'S MERS ROBO SIGNER LINDA GREEN
This entry was posted in MERS Assignment Of Mortgage FRAUD and tagged CHERYL SAMONS, LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. STERN, MERS Assignment Of Mortgage FRAUD
http://mariokenny.wordpress.com/2010/04/03/law-offices-of-david-j-stern-cheryl-samons-mers-assignment-of-mortgage-fraud/
http://mariokenny.wordpress.com/2010/04/03/law-offices-of-david-j-stern-cheryl-samons-mers-assignment-of-mortgage-fraud/
MATTHEW DEVLIN ?
LEHMANN BROTHERS HOLDING?
RALPH FISCHER
413-049-2749
SECURITY COURT ORDERED
BEFORE JUSTICE MEIKLEM OF THE BC SUPREME COURT
JUNE 19 1995
CAMPBELL RIVER BC
SPECIFIC COMBINED FINAL BANK OF MONTREAL 1ST MATRIMONIAL MORTGAGE DEBT
MAXIMUS DEBTORS MONIES TO BE APPLIED TO THE 1ST MORTGAGE MATRIMONIAL DEBT OBLIGATION PURSUANT TO A DEED OF TRUST MADE BY CONSENT AND W/COUNSEL.
DEED OF TRUST/1992 SEPERATION AGREEMENT REGISTERED IN SUPREME COURT AND BC FAMILY COURT
CROWN/BIG CORP/BIG OIL /BIG GOVERNMENT PONZIE
CASH FLOW REFINANCING MORTGAGE FRAUD
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
IT APPEARS THE BM0 1988 MATRIMONIAL MORTGAGE AND PROPERTY ISSUE BROUGHT BEFORE JUSTICE MEIKLEM ON JUNE 19 1995 HAD BEEN UP FOR A TAX SALE ON SEPT 25 1994 DUE TO MUNICAPLITY TAX ARREARS /LEVEIS
STATEMENT OF UNPAID TAXES FOR THE PREVIOUS YEARS
THE BC SUPREME COURT S FINAL ORDER IS VOID /ILLEGAL DUE TO THE FACT THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN DISCHARGED DUE TO A DEFAULT BASED ON SECURITIES FRAUD.
JUSTICE MEIKLEMS
FINAL ORDER
TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS
JUNE 19 1995
PERJURY
TAX FORECLOSURE
SEPT 25 1994
2. 1st Mortgage - Sun Life Assurance Company (“Sun Life”)
The blanket first mortgage on the Properties of approximately $6.2 million matures April 15, 2003. We have met with officials of Sun Life and confirm that the mortgage is in good standing and that they have expressed a willingness to work with the Judicial Trustee.
The blanket first mortgage on the Properties of approximately $6.2 million matures April 15, 2003. We have met with officials of Sun Life and confirm that the mortgage is in good standing and that they have expressed a willingness to work with the Judicial Trustee.
MERS/STERN
June 27, 2011 Florida Bar Gets Stern With Stern The FUBAR caused by the sudden discharge of the law firm of David J. Stern by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other lenders has morphed into a myriad of headaches for courts, lenders, borrowers and other affected parties in Florida over the past six months (including, incredibly, causing an apparent shortage of lawyers). Stern's also been locked in a Celebrity Deathmatch-like struggle with former clients over unpaid legal fees. To put a cherry on top of Stern's Snafu Sundae, on June 17th, the Florida Bar (the association that governs lawyers, not to be confused with The Florida Beach Bar and Terrace in the land down under) announced that it had filed a complaint against Stern "for allegedly violating the bar's rules by failing to produce documents as ordered by the court in February."
Stern's lawyer posited a couple of plausible defenses.
Stern's attorney Jeff Tew told The Palm Beach Post his client was fired from SunTrust in mid-December 2010, before the Feb. 16 order was issued. Tew also said it was possible Stern missed the notice among 10,000 pieces of incoming mail everyday.
Or maybe his dog ate the order.
I don't care how much money Stern made in his stint as "The Florida Foreclosure King." No amount of money could compensate him for the shock-and-awe of the offal storm that has been raining down on his head since "robo-signing" became a national catch phrase.
This entire episode ought to be a case study in the inherent risks of running a foreclosure mill.http://www.banklawyersblog.com/3_bank_lawyers/2011/06/florida-bar-gets-stern-with-stern.html
BC DEBTOR/FAMILY COURT FLORIDA MERS "LINDA GREEN " CANADIAN ESTATE VICTIMS
an innocent man AND FAMILY financially railroaded by unscrupulous insurance companies brokers big banks,NORWEGIAN corporations , social workers,legal aid ,ombudsman,ministers of the CROWN and and their own Federal government using the QUEENS NAME ASSIGNED TO A US CONTRACTOR MAXIMUS INC HEADQUARTERED IN VIRGINIA USING MERS to pull off the GOLD / ALBERTA REAL ESTATE TAX SHELTER ,HELD IN A GROUP INVESTOR PLAN THROUGH SUNLIFE /CIBC PONZIE SCHEME.
SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT IN COLLUSION WITH CROWN /MINISTER OF FINANCE MASTERMINDED ESTATE/CRA PONZIE PENSION IDENTITY TAKEOVER
THE IN HOUSE CRA SOVEREIGN LEGAL LICE "HOUSE"MISSION -GOLD OIL LAND TAKEOVER.
pledged the VICTIM /ESTATE/PENSIONS /MUTUAL FUNDS /PERSONAL PROPERTY/LABOR/ESTATE ASSETS/as collateral
Stern's lawyer posited a couple of plausible defenses.
Stern's attorney Jeff Tew told The Palm Beach Post his client was fired from SunTrust in mid-December 2010, before the Feb. 16 order was issued. Tew also said it was possible Stern missed the notice among 10,000 pieces of incoming mail everyday.
Or maybe his dog ate the order.
I don't care how much money Stern made in his stint as "The Florida Foreclosure King." No amount of money could compensate him for the shock-and-awe of the offal storm that has been raining down on his head since "robo-signing" became a national catch phrase.
This entire episode ought to be a case study in the inherent risks of running a foreclosure mill.http://www.banklawyersblog.com/3_bank_lawyers/2011/06/florida-bar-gets-stern-with-stern.html
BC DEBTOR/FAMILY COURT FLORIDA MERS "LINDA GREEN " CANADIAN ESTATE VICTIMS
an innocent man AND FAMILY financially railroaded by unscrupulous insurance companies brokers big banks,NORWEGIAN corporations , social workers,legal aid ,ombudsman,ministers of the CROWN and and their own Federal government using the QUEENS NAME ASSIGNED TO A US CONTRACTOR MAXIMUS INC HEADQUARTERED IN VIRGINIA USING MERS to pull off the GOLD / ALBERTA REAL ESTATE TAX SHELTER ,HELD IN A GROUP INVESTOR PLAN THROUGH SUNLIFE /CIBC PONZIE SCHEME.
SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT IN COLLUSION WITH CROWN /MINISTER OF FINANCE MASTERMINDED ESTATE/CRA PONZIE PENSION IDENTITY TAKEOVER
THE IN HOUSE CRA SOVEREIGN LEGAL LICE "HOUSE"MISSION -GOLD OIL LAND TAKEOVER.
pledged the VICTIM /ESTATE/PENSIONS /MUTUAL FUNDS /PERSONAL PROPERTY/LABOR/ESTATE ASSETS/as collateral
Foreclosure plaintiff submits faked assignment documents in Pasco case Imagine you’ve been sued for foreclosure. Now, imagine the plaintiff submits, as evidence, a bunch of falsified documents to establish its right to foreclose.
That could never happen, right?
Wrong. It did, and Pasco Judge Lynn Tepper found out and would not stand for it, in U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Harpster (51-2007-CA-6684ES) [PDF]
In the Harpster case, the plaintiff, represented by the Law Office of David J. Stern, submitted to the court an “assignment of mortgage” which supposedly gave the plaintiff, U.S. Bank, the right to proceed with the foreclosure. Cheryl Samons (actually an employee of David Stern) signed the affidavit as the “Assistant Secretary” of MERS, and Terry Rice, a Florida Notary Public, notarized it.
All this supposedly happened on December 5, 2007. Only one problem – the notary’s stamp said Terry Rice’s commission expired on May 19, 2012. That stamp could not have been lawfully issued any time before May 19, 2008. So that assignment document wasn’t really signed on December 5 of 2007 – unless our notary has discovered a way to travel in time.
Judge Tepper was none too pleased about the fraud. When informed by Tampa attorney Ralph Fisher, she not only threw out the fraudulent assignment documents, she dismissed the case “with prejudice” – meaning that U.S. Bank can never again file a foreclosure action against this defendant. It seems pretty likely, now, that the Harpsters are going to get to keep their house as long as they like.
That could never happen, right?
Wrong. It did, and Pasco Judge Lynn Tepper found out and would not stand for it, in U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Harpster (51-2007-CA-6684ES) [PDF]
In the Harpster case, the plaintiff, represented by the Law Office of David J. Stern, submitted to the court an “assignment of mortgage” which supposedly gave the plaintiff, U.S. Bank, the right to proceed with the foreclosure. Cheryl Samons (actually an employee of David Stern) signed the affidavit as the “Assistant Secretary” of MERS, and Terry Rice, a Florida Notary Public, notarized it.
All this supposedly happened on December 5, 2007. Only one problem – the notary’s stamp said Terry Rice’s commission expired on May 19, 2012. That stamp could not have been lawfully issued any time before May 19, 2008. So that assignment document wasn’t really signed on December 5 of 2007 – unless our notary has discovered a way to travel in time.
Judge Tepper was none too pleased about the fraud. When informed by Tampa attorney Ralph Fisher, she not only threw out the fraudulent assignment documents, she dismissed the case “with prejudice” – meaning that U.S. Bank can never again file a foreclosure action against this defendant. It seems pretty likely, now, that the Harpsters are going to get to keep their house as long as they like.
MINISTRY OF Attorney GENERAL /MINISTRY OF FINANCE
LEGAL SERVICES BRANCH PONZIE CORRUPTION DATING BACK TO THE MICHEAL MILKEN JUNK BOND CASE IN THE LATE 1980'S.
2007-Data "catastrophe" in UK warning for BC Government
MR. CAMPBELL ,BC LIBERALS PREMIER AND WAS WARNED.......BUT HE DID NOTHING AND BECAUSE HE DID NOTHING I'M SHORT 2 FAMILY MEMBERS/WHISTLEBLOWER ESTATE WITNESSES..........
MYSTERIOUS DEATHS NEEDED TO BE INVESTIGATED
THERE ARE ALSO 2 OTHER DEATHS RELATED TO INSURANCE FRAUD THAT NEED INVESTIGATING.
GOVERNMENT CRA INSIDERS TAMPERED WITH BC DEBTOR IDENITY DOCUMENTS 2 DIFFERENT MARRIAGE CERTIFICATES ATTACHED TO ONE SIN #ATTACHED TO A FLORIDA SUN LIFE TRUST DEADMANS ESTATE ATTACHED TO BC DEBTOR SIN #
STOLEN BC SUPREME COURT ORAL/INKED consent under assignment to the Queen in the Right of BC -MINISTRY OF SOCIAL SERVICES-MAXIMUS /WELFARE DIVORCE CLIENT/WELFARE CLAIMENT
LEGAL AID NORTH ISLAND DIRECTOR-EX WIFE LAWYER-
CR LAWYERS -PRIVATE FIRM MASTERMINDED ILLEGAL TRANSFER OF A JOINT COMPANY ESTATE .
DEBTOR DEFENDANT UN -REPRESENTED
JUNE 19 1995
CANADIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT LEGAL AID/CRA /MAXIMUS US INC ESTATE FRAUD SECRETLY PROTECTED/SEALED IN A US FLORIDA GROUP TRUST ACCOUNT
SOVEREIGN GROUP INVESTORS ARE COMMITING CRIMINAL FINANCIAL PAPER TERRORISM-CRIMINAL STALKING
SOVEREIGN CITIZEN-FLORIDA
EX GIRLFREND AUTHORSHIP?
SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT EX WIFE AUTHORSHIP?
LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES ARE CASH ASSETS FOR COPORATIONS AND LTD COMPANIES
http://bonaventurecourt.com/x_contempt.htm
Action No. 0201 – 13248
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY
KENDAX INVESTMENTS INC.
Applicant AND
DONALD CARMICHAEL AND 658051 ONTARIO LIMITED
Respondents
JUDICIAL TRUSTEE’S FIRST REPORT TO THE OWNERS OF CONDOMINIUM PLAN 8811686, UNITS 1 – 195, 205 HERITAGE DRIVE SE, CALGARY, AB (BONAVENTURE COURT) (the “Properties”)
Alger & Associates Inc. (“Alger”), has been appointed Judicial Trustee in accordance with various Orders made by the Honorable Justice R.M. Cairns of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta made during December 2002 through February 2003. The purpose of this report is to inform the owners of the Properties of our appointment, those actions undertaken by us to date and of other relevant information.
As Judicial Trustee, we are a neutral party whose duties include:
· Taking possession of and managing and operating the Properties, via a property management agreement with Fireside Management Ltd. (“Fireside”), the current property manager.
· Holding the legal title to each of the 195 condominium units in trust for the beneficial owners, in the event that 658051 Ontario Limited’s corporate status is not revived by February 28, 2003.
· Attending to the affairs of the Properties in general and particularly to renew the 1st Mortgage in favour of Sun Life Assurance Company due April 1, 2003. To investigate the validity of the second mortgage in favour of Kingscroft Investments Limited and review the appropriateness of any other encumbrances to the titles on the units.
· Monitoring the past and current affairs of the Properties, including reviewing the propriety of prior transactions and the current management of the Properties.
Most of our duties and powers are set out in the Order of the Honorable Justice R.M. Cairns of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, dated January 22, 2003, a copy of which is attached for your reference. Copies of all other Orders made with respect to this matter are available on our website at www.corporaterecovery.ca under ‘Engagement Bulletin Board’. If you do not have access to the Internet, please contact our office to obtain copies of the additional Orders if you wish.
1. Change of Title to Your Unit
658051 Ontario Limited, which holds a title to the Properties in trust, is currently not a legally subsisting corporation, having been struck from the Ontario Registry of Corporations in 1995. If 658051 Ontario Limited does not regain its legal status by February 28, 2003, then title to units will automatically be transferred to a nominee corporation wholly controlled by the Judicial Trustee.
2. 1st Mortgage - Sun Life Assurance Company (“Sun Life”)
The blanket first mortgage on the Properties of approximately $6.2 million matures April 15, 2003. We have met with officials of Sun Life and confirm that the mortgage is in good standing and that they have expressed a willingness to work with the Judicial Trustee.
If 658051 Ontario Limited regains its legal status before February 28, 2003, it is obligated by Order of the Alberta Court to renew the mortgage otherwise, we will attend to this renewal. Please be advised that we intend to renew the mortgage on a short-term basis of between six months and a year, so that we may explore further the option of fracturing the mortgage or obtaining a new blanket mortgage capable of being paid down on a unit-by-unit basis. Any such mortgage other than a blanket mortgage would have to be obtained elsewhere as Sun Life has indicated they do not provide this type of financing.
We have had preliminary discussions with five lenders and are also waiting to hear from Mr. Carmichael regarding steps that may have already been taken to obtain alternate mortgage financing. Our own investigations indicate that at least one lender has some level of interest in providing a blanket mortgage capable of being paid down on a unit-by-unit basis. However, no lender we spoke to was interested in providing a fractured mortgage.
It is our intention to provide a report to the owners regarding the various options available for mortgage financing once we have completed our investigations.
3. Day to Day Operations
As you will note from the Court Order appointing Alger, we are to continue using the existing management company, Fireside unless we determine that, in the interests of the owners, new managers should be retained. We have met with officials of Fireside, reviewed the Properties and made various inquiries regarding Fireside, which have led us to conclude that it is appropriate for Fireside to continue to manage the day-to-day operations of the property.
4. Cash Flow
All day-to-day operating payments and 1st Mortgage payments will, with our supervision, continue to be made by Fireside. Net cash, after operations and 1st Mortgage payments, is to be paid to the Judicial Trustee. These funds will be held on deposit in an interest bearing account which currently earns prime minus 2%. Disbursements from this account will include the Judicial Trustee’s costs and other payments as ordered by the Court.
The Court has also ordered that “No further monies shall be paid out by Fireside to Kingscroft Investments Ltd. or any other Donald Carmichael company in respect of the second mortgage that is registered against title to the Properties” … “pending a review and audit by” the Judicial Trustee and a report to the Court. We have commenced our review in this regard.
5. Monitoring Past Financial Affairs of the Properties
An in trust financial statement as at December 2001 indicated that 658051 Ontario Limited held the following assets in trust for the owners of the Property:
Assets
Cash
$247,476
Reserve Fund
85,000
Land
904,125
Building
8,782,380
Chattels
258,000
Due from Related Party
1,102,001
11,378,982
We have commenced preliminary inquiries to determine the disposition of cash, reserve funds and the amount due from Related Party. A report of our findings will be provided to the owners as further information becomes available.
6. Income Tax Information
We have recently requested that Mr. Carmichael provide us with a cost estimate to prepare the annual income tax information required by each owner. Assuming this cost is reasonable, we anticipate having this information prepared by Mr. Carmichael and his accountants for distribution to all owners.
7. Contacting the Judicial Trustee
If you would like to contact us to provide your views regarding a fracturable mortgage or to discuss anything in this letter, please contact undersignedat 1-800-661-8284.
Information, as it becomes available, may also be obtained from our assignment bulletin board located at www.corporaterecovery.ca.
Yours truly,
ALGER & ASSOCIATES INC.
Bruce E. Alger, CA·CIRP, President Dated: February 20, 2003
Enclosures
cc. Maureen Dawson
Bishop & McKenzie LLP
Terry Czechowskyj
Miles Davison McCarthy McNiven LLP
Carla Murray
Burnet Duckworth & Palmer LLP
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY
KENDAX INVESTMENTS INC.
Applicant AND
DONALD CARMICHAEL AND 658051 ONTARIO LIMITED
Respondents
JUDICIAL TRUSTEE’S FIRST REPORT TO THE OWNERS OF CONDOMINIUM PLAN 8811686, UNITS 1 – 195, 205 HERITAGE DRIVE SE, CALGARY, AB (BONAVENTURE COURT) (the “Properties”)
Alger & Associates Inc. (“Alger”), has been appointed Judicial Trustee in accordance with various Orders made by the Honorable Justice R.M. Cairns of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta made during December 2002 through February 2003. The purpose of this report is to inform the owners of the Properties of our appointment, those actions undertaken by us to date and of other relevant information.
As Judicial Trustee, we are a neutral party whose duties include:
· Taking possession of and managing and operating the Properties, via a property management agreement with Fireside Management Ltd. (“Fireside”), the current property manager.
· Holding the legal title to each of the 195 condominium units in trust for the beneficial owners, in the event that 658051 Ontario Limited’s corporate status is not revived by February 28, 2003.
· Attending to the affairs of the Properties in general and particularly to renew the 1st Mortgage in favour of Sun Life Assurance Company due April 1, 2003. To investigate the validity of the second mortgage in favour of Kingscroft Investments Limited and review the appropriateness of any other encumbrances to the titles on the units.
· Monitoring the past and current affairs of the Properties, including reviewing the propriety of prior transactions and the current management of the Properties.
Most of our duties and powers are set out in the Order of the Honorable Justice R.M. Cairns of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, dated January 22, 2003, a copy of which is attached for your reference. Copies of all other Orders made with respect to this matter are available on our website at www.corporaterecovery.ca under ‘Engagement Bulletin Board’. If you do not have access to the Internet, please contact our office to obtain copies of the additional Orders if you wish.
1. Change of Title to Your Unit
658051 Ontario Limited, which holds a title to the Properties in trust, is currently not a legally subsisting corporation, having been struck from the Ontario Registry of Corporations in 1995. If 658051 Ontario Limited does not regain its legal status by February 28, 2003, then title to units will automatically be transferred to a nominee corporation wholly controlled by the Judicial Trustee.
2. 1st Mortgage - Sun Life Assurance Company (“Sun Life”)
The blanket first mortgage on the Properties of approximately $6.2 million matures April 15, 2003. We have met with officials of Sun Life and confirm that the mortgage is in good standing and that they have expressed a willingness to work with the Judicial Trustee.
If 658051 Ontario Limited regains its legal status before February 28, 2003, it is obligated by Order of the Alberta Court to renew the mortgage otherwise, we will attend to this renewal. Please be advised that we intend to renew the mortgage on a short-term basis of between six months and a year, so that we may explore further the option of fracturing the mortgage or obtaining a new blanket mortgage capable of being paid down on a unit-by-unit basis. Any such mortgage other than a blanket mortgage would have to be obtained elsewhere as Sun Life has indicated they do not provide this type of financing.
We have had preliminary discussions with five lenders and are also waiting to hear from Mr. Carmichael regarding steps that may have already been taken to obtain alternate mortgage financing. Our own investigations indicate that at least one lender has some level of interest in providing a blanket mortgage capable of being paid down on a unit-by-unit basis. However, no lender we spoke to was interested in providing a fractured mortgage.
It is our intention to provide a report to the owners regarding the various options available for mortgage financing once we have completed our investigations.
3. Day to Day Operations
As you will note from the Court Order appointing Alger, we are to continue using the existing management company, Fireside unless we determine that, in the interests of the owners, new managers should be retained. We have met with officials of Fireside, reviewed the Properties and made various inquiries regarding Fireside, which have led us to conclude that it is appropriate for Fireside to continue to manage the day-to-day operations of the property.
4. Cash Flow
All day-to-day operating payments and 1st Mortgage payments will, with our supervision, continue to be made by Fireside. Net cash, after operations and 1st Mortgage payments, is to be paid to the Judicial Trustee. These funds will be held on deposit in an interest bearing account which currently earns prime minus 2%. Disbursements from this account will include the Judicial Trustee’s costs and other payments as ordered by the Court.
The Court has also ordered that “No further monies shall be paid out by Fireside to Kingscroft Investments Ltd. or any other Donald Carmichael company in respect of the second mortgage that is registered against title to the Properties” … “pending a review and audit by” the Judicial Trustee and a report to the Court. We have commenced our review in this regard.
5. Monitoring Past Financial Affairs of the Properties
An in trust financial statement as at December 2001 indicated that 658051 Ontario Limited held the following assets in trust for the owners of the Property:
Assets
Cash
$247,476
Reserve Fund
85,000
Land
904,125
Building
8,782,380
Chattels
258,000
Due from Related Party
1,102,001
11,378,982
We have commenced preliminary inquiries to determine the disposition of cash, reserve funds and the amount due from Related Party. A report of our findings will be provided to the owners as further information becomes available.
6. Income Tax Information
We have recently requested that Mr. Carmichael provide us with a cost estimate to prepare the annual income tax information required by each owner. Assuming this cost is reasonable, we anticipate having this information prepared by Mr. Carmichael and his accountants for distribution to all owners.
7. Contacting the Judicial Trustee
If you would like to contact us to provide your views regarding a fracturable mortgage or to discuss anything in this letter, please contact undersignedat 1-800-661-8284.
Information, as it becomes available, may also be obtained from our assignment bulletin board located at www.corporaterecovery.ca.
Yours truly,
ALGER & ASSOCIATES INC.
Bruce E. Alger, CA·CIRP, President Dated: February 20, 2003
Enclosures
cc. Maureen Dawson
Bishop & McKenzie LLP
Terry Czechowskyj
Miles Davison McCarthy McNiven LLP
Carla Murray
Burnet Duckworth & Palmer LLP
- Consent Order Subordinating Judicial Trustee's Charge on the Lands to the First Mortgagee & Successors - May 16, 2003
- Adjournment of the Motion to Have the Order Granting Powers to the Judicial Trustee Set Aside - March 31, 2003
- Adjournment of Contempt Motion - April 10, 2003
- Appeal of Contempt Order - May 30, 2003
- Appeal of Order Dismissing Respondents' Discharge Application - May 30, 2003
- Dismissal of Motion to Have Judicial Trustee Discharged - March 31, 2003
- Dismissal of Motion for an Order of Return of Monies - April 10, 2003
- Applicant's Motion for an Order of Return of Monies - January 30, 2003
- June 9, 2003 Court Order empowering and authorizing the Judicial Trustee to renew or replace the Sun Life Mortgage
- June 9, 2003 Court Order approving the Judicial Trustee's accounts to April 30, 2003
- The Judicial Trustee's Third Report - June 3, 2003
- Income Statement for Bonaventure Court - May 2003
- April 10, 2003 Court Order (Entered May 26, 2003) Stating That 658051 Ontario Ltd. And Donald Carmichael Are In Contempt
- Judicial Trustee's Second Report - April 4, 2003
- Consent Order of March 21, 2003 Regarding Revival of 658051 Ontario Limited
- Notice of Appeal Regarding Provisions of December 4, 2002 Order and the Whole of Orders of January 22, 2003 and February 4, 2003
- February 20, 2003 - Judicial Trustee's First Report
- February 4, 2003 Court Order Directing that the Title to the Lands Vest in the Name of the Judicial Trustee if 658051 Ontario Inc. is not Revived by February 28, 2003
- February 4, 2003 Court Order Directing No Monies to Any Carmichael Company Subject to Further Order of the Court
- January 22, 2003 Court Order Setting Out the Duties and Powers of the Judicial Trustee
- January 14, 2003 Court Order Amending the December 4, 2002 Order to Identify the Trust Agreement as the Trust Instrument
- December 20, 2002 Court Order Appointing the Judicial Trustee
- December 4, 2002 Court Order Appointing a Judicial Trustee to be
Chosen by the Parties
Chosen by the Parties
Middle District Orlando
CANADIAN Junk BOND RECOVERY US Queen for Mr Bonaventure ?
(QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA ESTATE VICTIM
TARGETED ESTATE VICTIM AND HEIRS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OF UNDISCHARABLE sovereign created FEDERAL OWED mortgage DEBT PROCURED BY IDENITY THEFT USING #SIN AND DOB/ forged reissue #marriage certificate - IDENITY IMPERSONATION /NOTARY FRAUD/ACCOUNTING FRAUD /EMBEZZLEMENT/FORGERY UNDER LEGAL ASSIGNMENT TO THE BC GOVERNMENT’S US CONTRACTOR
US MAXIMUS INC IN COLLUSION WITH MERS
HEDGEFUND created the ministry of social services
WELFARE FRAUD /REAL ESTATE TAX SHELTER PONZIE
USING MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET/
FLORIDA ESTATE FRAUD/TRAFFICKING FORGED CANADIAN GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS INCLUDIND ILLEGAL FINAL BC SUPREME COURT ORDER/DEED OF TRUST
SCHEILA A CLARK
SUSAN S BUCKLEW
KAREN S JENNEMANN
JACK SPRINGSTEAD
RICHARD A LAZARRA
TERRY E HEATH
ERNEST S PELUSO
GREGORY LITTLE
CHARLES STUTTS
BRADELY E KING
JOHN MICHEAL BROWN
FRANK DEROSA
PAUL COPENHAVER
HENRY M PAULSON JR
MARTIN J JENKINS
ANGELA LAMIE
D ,LOWELL JENSEN
VALERIE LYNN STEWARD
SUSAN S BUCKLEW
KAREN S JENNEMANN
JACK SPRINGSTEAD
RICHARD A LAZARRA
TERRY E HEATH
ERNEST S PELUSO
GREGORY LITTLE
CHARLES STUTTS
BRADELY E KING
JOHN MICHEAL BROWN
FRANK DEROSA
PAUL COPENHAVER
HENRY M PAULSON JR
MARTIN J JENKINS
ANGELA LAMIE
D ,LOWELL JENSEN
VALERIE LYNN STEWARD
ILLEGAL NOTICE OF ATTACHMENT
WALL STREET INVESTORS GREED/FORGERY
LIE :THESE PAYMENTS ARE IN THE AMOUNT OF $412 EACH
CAMPBELLS CATASROPHE
Data "catastrophe" in UK warning for BC Government 28 Nov '07 Cost and risks mount in billion dollar IT privatization gamble The BCGEU is calling on the Campbell government to review Information Technology (IT) privatization and halt any further expansion following the spectacular failures, privacy breaches, massive cost overruns and allegations of fraud and bribery against subsidiaries of the Texas based Electronic Data Systems (EDS) and Virginia based Maximus.
The BC government has already privatized the administration of Provincial Revenue collection with EDS. MSP and Pharmacare are privately administered by Maximus.
"The Campbell government has committed nearly a billion dollars to foreign based multinationals that fail to deliver time and time again" said BCGEU president George Heyman.
The BC government has an outstanding Request For Proposal looking for a private company to provide mainframe hosting for the BC government. The contract could run for 20 years. EDS and Maximus are both considered prime contenders for these contracts. This privatization would put a vast array of confidential government information in the hands of these troubled companies.
Serious problems continue to plague both EDS and Maximus in jurisdictions around the world (for a detailed list see attached backgrounder):
BACKGROUNDER
MAXIMUS AND EDS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA:
2007:
The BC government has already privatized the administration of Provincial Revenue collection with EDS. MSP and Pharmacare are privately administered by Maximus.
"The Campbell government has committed nearly a billion dollars to foreign based multinationals that fail to deliver time and time again" said BCGEU president George Heyman.
The BC government has an outstanding Request For Proposal looking for a private company to provide mainframe hosting for the BC government. The contract could run for 20 years. EDS and Maximus are both considered prime contenders for these contracts. This privatization would put a vast array of confidential government information in the hands of these troubled companies.
Serious problems continue to plague both EDS and Maximus in jurisdictions around the world (for a detailed list see attached backgrounder):
- EDS is at the centre of a data leak in Britain described as "catastrophic" by The Times newspaper (November 22, 2007). To avoid an exorbitant EDS surcharge to remove personal data, the government shipped insecure files. Data on 25 million British citizens has been misplaced leaving them vulnerable to identity theft.
- In September EDS agreed to pay almost $500,000(US) to halt a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into allegations of accounting irregularities and bribery allegations in an Indian contract.
- In July Maximus paid a $30 million (US) settlement after the company was accused of helping to defraud the federal Medicaid program.
BACKGROUNDER
MAXIMUS AND EDS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA:
- November 2004 - EDS awarded a 10-year contract worth $572 million by the Ministry of Provincial Revenue to manage revenue and debt collection. Cost to taxpayers has climbed 21% in the first three years of the contract.
- November 2004 - Maximus awarded a 10-year, $325-million contract by the BC government to manage provincial health records (Pharmacare & MSP).
- 2005 - Maximus fined for violating contract with BC government. Failed in seven consecutive months to provide adequate service and waitlists were longer than contractually agreed.
2007:
- November - EDS is at the centre of a "catastrophic" data leak in which personal information on 25 million British citizens was lost. Attempting to avoid an EDS surcharge to remove confidential information from data files, the UK government transported insecure files which were lost in transit.
- November - State of Connecticut sues Maximus over a botched $6 million upgrade of a major law enforcement database.
- October - The UK government considers court action against EDS. Problems plaguing an EDS computer system to implement tax credits led to millions of pounds of overpayments.
- September - EDS agrees to pay $490,902 (US) to settle a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into accounting irregularities. The company still faces shareholder and employee lawsuits connected to the case. In a related decision, a former employee pays a settlement in relation to allegations of bribing a government official in India.
- August - the UK National Offender Management System freezes spending on an EDS contract to deliver a computer system for the prison & probation agencies after EDS cost estimate increases from £234 million to £950 million. The entire program may be scrapped.
- July - Maximus agrees to a $30 million (US) settlement amidst allegations from the US government that Maximus helped defraud the federal Medicaid program. Chief Executive Richard Montoni tells the Washington Post that Maximus "has accepted full responsibility for the conduct of its employees."
- March - Texas government cancels $899 million (US) contract with private consortium, including Maximus, hired to privatize the state's social services eligibility system after a year of problems including delays, missing data, missed payments and declining enrollment.
- Ontario government terminates a 4 year contract with Maximus for failing to deliver services as contractually agreed. Ontario government sues Maximus and wins a $2.5 million law suit.
STANDARD SIGNATURE OF ALBERTA QUEENS BENCH
JUDGE KAREN HORNER
NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA
DUBLIN CALIFORNIA
IRS FORFIETED OR WAS SWINDLED OUT OF $19 MILLION IN CANADIAN BONDS TO BE RELEASED TO A CONVICTED FELON FOR DISTRIBUTION OF ASSEST OF COMPANIES UNDER HER CAPITAL TRUST'S CONTROL
JANICE WEEKS KATONA IS DOING TIME FOR TRYING TO HIRE A HIT MAN IN RETALATION AGAINST THE JUDGE FOR TAKING HER BONDS AWAY IN THE FIRST PLACE
CONVICTED FELON/SOVEREIGN LEGAL GANG REOPENED A FORGED 14 YEAR OLD FLORIDA FORECLOSURE ATTACHED TO ILLEGAL ALBERTA PERSONAL PROPERTY LIENS ,BC SUPREME COURT ORDERS, DEED OF TRUSTS, BC WRITS ATTACHED TO FORGED ONTARIO JOINT COMPANES HELD IN LIFE ESTATES REGISTERED IN FLORIDA
FORGED COMPAINIES/ ESTATES IN CHRONIC DEFAULT/FORECLOSURE/BANKRUPTIES/RESTRUCTURING/MERGERS
The fraud may have been uncovered because of the unrelated arrest on Dec. 11 2008 of fund manager Bernard Madoff
COUNTY OF BROWARD FLORIDA
WITNESS
HARRY INNOCENT
NOTARY
TERRY RICE
Matthew Devlin, Lehman Broker
wife Nina -partner in Brunswick Group LLC, an international public relations firm.
who's RALPH?
PHONE 413 949 2749?
Matthew Devlin, Lehman Broker, Charged With Insider Trading On Wife's Info
NEW YORK — A former Lehman Brothers broker who gleaned tips about pending mergers from his wife, a partner at a high-powered public relations firm, was charged Thursday in a wide-ranging insider trading scheme that earned $4.8 million in profits for several people including a former Playboy model and two lawyers, authorities said.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan and the Securities and Exchange Commission brought the case Thursday against Matthew C. Devlin, who authorities said enabled clients and friends to make millions of dollars while he was rewarded with gifts including cash, a Cartier watch, a widescreen television and tuition at a Porsche driving school.
The SEC said Devlin took secrets from March 2004 through last July about more than a dozen pending mergers and acquisitions from his wife, Nina, a partner at Brunswick Group LLC, an international public relations firm.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/18/matthew-devlin-lehman-bro_n_152262.html
NEW YORK — A former Lehman Brothers broker who gleaned tips about pending mergers from his wife, a partner at a high-powered public relations firm, was charged Thursday in a wide-ranging insider trading scheme that earned $4.8 million in profits for several people including a former Playboy model and two lawyers, authorities said.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan and the Securities and Exchange Commission brought the case Thursday against Matthew C. Devlin, who authorities said enabled clients and friends to make millions of dollars while he was rewarded with gifts including cash, a Cartier watch, a widescreen television and tuition at a Porsche driving school.
The SEC said Devlin took secrets from March 2004 through last July about more than a dozen pending mergers and acquisitions from his wife, Nina, a partner at Brunswick Group LLC, an international public relations firm.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/18/matthew-devlin-lehman-bro_n_152262.html
Corporate Redemption / CROWN PONZIE PENSION SHAREHOLDER PAPER TERRORISM
sovereign citizens investor group
financial gang stalking
FBI) regards the instructors and promoters of Redemption schemes as fraudsters
sovereign citizens investor group
financial gang stalking
FBI) regards the instructors and promoters of Redemption schemes as fraudsters
45 UNITS
Redemption movement From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The redemption movement consists of supporters of an American conspiracy theory.[1] Redemption theory involves claims that when the U.S. government abandoned the gold standard in 1933, it pledged its citizens as collateral so it could borrow money. The movement also asserts that common citizens can gain access to funds in secret accounts using obscure procedures and regulations.According to the theory, the government created a fictitious person (or "straw man") corresponding to each newborn citizen with bank accounts initially holding $630,000. The theory further holds that through obscure procedures under the Uniform Commercial Code, a citizen can "reclaim" the straw man and write checks against its accounts.[2] Its adherents sometimes call themselves "sovereign citizens".
There have been many well-publicized convictions of citizens attempting to take advantage of this theory and the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) regards the instructors and promoters of Redemption schemes as fraudsters [3] while the U.S. Internal Revenue Service has included the "straw man" claim in its list of frivolous positions that may result in the imposition of a $5,000 penalty[4] when used as the basis for an inaccurate tax return.[5]
There have been many well-publicized convictions of citizens attempting to take advantage of this theory and the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) regards the instructors and promoters of Redemption schemes as fraudsters [3] while the U.S. Internal Revenue Service has included the "straw man" claim in its list of frivolous positions that may result in the imposition of a $5,000 penalty[4] when used as the basis for an inaccurate tax return.[5]
--
The issue now in 2011 is once again forged life insurance taken out behind the victims back .ISSUE NOW IS FORGED LIFE INSURANCE/DISABILTY INSURANCE TAKEN OUT BY THE TD AND OTHER BANKS TO PAY FOR THEIR BONAVENTURE COURT PONZIE COMPANIES DEFAULTS/foreclosures and corporate bankruptcies.
Since it appears that the Mers ROBO signers aka LINDA GREENS assigned THE MORTGAGE FRAUD TO THE LEHMAN BROTHERS lives are once again targeted to further INVESTORS FINANCIAL GREED.
With Dna from IRISH AMERICAN US DOLAN'S with ties to 3 generations of " DEAD PEASANTS"Insurance frauds ie : over insured company principle interest is a very serious concern.
THE sovereign HOUSE usually wins
IT'S LINCON COUNTY MURPHY DOLAN GANG BACK AT IT.
Generations of this DOLAN FAMILY were connected to IMPERIAL OIL just like Mr. Harpers family.
I know very well how the IMPERIAL HOUSE works
SOVERIEGN MONOPOLY.
Let me make myself very clear .
I'm not implyng that every FREEMASON is a criminal. What I am implying is that like any society when directing minds ignore the laws of society, and the constitutions, then it is warranted to call the chapter/LODGE ILLEGAL and nothing more than criminal network of .
It's all about SOVEREIGN legal BROTHERHOOD ,corruption stock ,power ,elite societies. I'm not making this up ,in fact I've lived it. When you come from the "house " even your own DNA may be tempted to cash in on the event of your"ACCIDENTAL " death.
Since it appears that the Mers ROBO signers aka LINDA GREENS assigned THE MORTGAGE FRAUD TO THE LEHMAN BROTHERS lives are once again targeted to further INVESTORS FINANCIAL GREED.
With Dna from IRISH AMERICAN US DOLAN'S with ties to 3 generations of " DEAD PEASANTS"Insurance frauds ie : over insured company principle interest is a very serious concern.
THE sovereign HOUSE usually wins
IT'S LINCON COUNTY MURPHY DOLAN GANG BACK AT IT.
Generations of this DOLAN FAMILY were connected to IMPERIAL OIL just like Mr. Harpers family.
I know very well how the IMPERIAL HOUSE works
SOVERIEGN MONOPOLY.
Let me make myself very clear .
I'm not implyng that every FREEMASON is a criminal. What I am implying is that like any society when directing minds ignore the laws of society, and the constitutions, then it is warranted to call the chapter/LODGE ILLEGAL and nothing more than criminal network of .
It's all about SOVEREIGN legal BROTHERHOOD ,corruption stock ,power ,elite societies. I'm not making this up ,in fact I've lived it. When you come from the "house " even your own DNA may be tempted to cash in on the event of your"ACCIDENTAL " death.
